anHOURover
Well-Known Member
disagreePoor guy knows nothing about contract proposals. At least you speak good English. I guess we will never hear your air driver proposal though.
fact
disagreePoor guy knows nothing about contract proposals. At least you speak good English. I guess we will never hear your air driver proposal though.
as you know it will be a tough sell in 623Nahhh, we will make sure you are forced into something worse.
Apparently 623 has nothing to add for proposals. Just a complaint department over there on Hog Island. All these posts and still avoiding the question. I thought 623 was strong?as you know it will be a tough sell in 623
we fight we don't lay down and take the rooster
fact
Your supervisor isn't coding it correctlyI want to see some more flexibility with sick days. I have over 150 hours but If I can't use more than 48 hours of it in a 9 month period without getting disciplined. So It's just going to build up to 75 days and start getting cashed out.
Instead I would like to see that if you have a certain amount of sick time you should be able to cash it out as needed instead of just banking 75 days which is impossible to use.
For example, as a lower seniority driver, I am laid off most Mondays and sometimes on Tuesdays. Instead of being coded as being laid off, I would like the option to use my sick time so I can have a decent paycheck and pay my bills. Since the company is going to pay me that sick time either way, I don't see why this shouldn't be a viable option.
I haven't gone through all of these pages, so I don't know if anyone has brought this up, but as a feeder driver, subcontracting is a huge issue. The International has done a very poor job dealing with it.
It may not seem important to part-timers and package car drivers, but along with health care, subcontracting is a big wedge issue that has a real potential to break us. If we, as a union, can't get a grip on it, it could really get away from us. If it does, you can bet it will trickle down to package car too. And know one wants to find out where that leads us.
By the letter of the contract, management is allowed to use subcontractors for a defined time during peak. In practice though, they use them year round. Currently, drivers are laid off while gypsies run our loads. Why Hoffa doesn't take a stand on this I'll never know.
Since we are the highest paid drivers on the road, perhaps it is time we put our efforts into strengthening our contract language instead of more money. As it is now, we are on an unsustainable path to our future.
Up above I stated that the grey areas in article 40 have to be fixed.
There are article 22 brothers and sisters who are being paid a split rate .
I haven't gone through all of these pages, so I don't know if anyone has brought this up, but as a feeder driver, subcontracting is a huge issue. The International has done a very poor job dealing with it.
By the letter of the contract, management is allowed to use subcontractors for a defined time during peak. In practice though, they use them year round. Currently, drivers are laid off while gypsies run our loads.
For a job that requires you to pretty live there Monday through Friday and sometimes Saturday.For a job that requires only a valid license and HS diploma?
Since we are the highest paid drivers on the road, perhaps it is time we put our efforts into strengthening our contract language instead of more money. As it is now, we are on an unsustainable path to our future.
Are you saying that there isn't a way, contractually, to force UPS to make this practice transparent?....That sounds like a Local problem. Member involvement, is the key.
Should your dues money, pay for someone to sit outside UPS.... and monitor traffic ??
You're probably right, it should be the membership's responsibility to monitor the yard, 24/7/365.
NMA 26 Sec 3 amended to give jurisdiction to grieve for subcontracted movements to origin AND DESTINATION locals.
There is no doubt, it takes vigilant enforcement.
In my Local (if) a contractor pulled in the yard, SHTF.... rather quickly.
That sounds like a Local problem. Member involvement, is the key.
Should your dues money, pay for someone to sit outside UPS.... and monitor traffic ??
-Bug-
You should absolutely be able to use a sick day for a layoff. We do it here all the time. If I come in and decide to take the day because lots of drivers are on the over I tell them to code me sick day.I want to see some more flexibility with sick days. I have over 150 hours but If I can't use more than 48 hours of it in a 9 month period without getting disciplined. So It's just going to build up to 75 days and start getting cashed out.
Instead I would like to see that if you have a certain amount of sick time you should be able to cash it out as needed instead of just banking 75 days which is impossible to use.
For example, as a lower seniority driver, I am laid off most Mondays and sometimes on Tuesdays. Instead of being coded as being laid off, I would like the option to use my sick time so I can have a decent paycheck and pay my bills. Since the company is going to pay me that sick time either way, I don't see why this shouldn't be a viable option.
You should absolutely be able to use a sick day for a layoff. We do it here all the time. If I come in and decide to take the day because lots of drivers are on the over I tell them to code me sick day.