.... Just jump on broad......!!
What does she look like?
.... Just jump on broad......!!
Maybe we understand a little more than others. As stewards Stink, 407 and I along with many others spend much of our time defending members and learning how to use the language to benefit all. We see the improvements others don't. I'm also older than most and don't believe for a second UPS will never lose. Go down a highway some night and count the number of FedEx trucks driving by. Those all used to be UPS Feeders.I have to say you and 407 are passionate about this. I like it. But you, 407 and stink are not passionate about a no vote. All the people you are sticking up for ( injured,military and 22.3s ) all would vote no on this. Just jump on broad. We need your vote and passion to sway other members. We deserve better as members. We work to hard for a company that never has or never will lose money. Vote No!!
You may be right Piedmont and when I get you elected as GP you can make that call. The IBT is frustrated with chickenpoop leaders who sit on their hands when they should be speaking up. To go back to the safety of their locals (89) and talk tough isn't my kind of leadership. Rejecting this TA for legit reasons is one thing but did you know L89 wants their members to be paid from the time they park their cars. I know they have a huge building and need to park a good distance but my grandmother took a friggin bus to work, maybe she should have had the mighty Zuckerman fighting for her. Rejecting this TA will cost a boatload more than accepting it. If we reject and go back, pt's will lose big.
Big shippers will bail as FedEx will exploit the rejection and seed the strike rumor.I disagree. How do you figure the PT's will loose if we reject the proposal and send it back to the bargaining table?
ITG, you are dead on the money!! This seems to be the biggest factor in the contract. As stewards we see much more than just words on paper. This is what we deal with everyday. I'm actually excited to get started on 8/1. Some people just don't get it and that's fine. We still have a job to do beyond their ignorance.As stewards Stink, 407 and I along with many others spend much of our time defending members and learning how to use the language to benefit all. We see the improvements others don't.
That's on their supplement talk. The master is for everyone. It could have been negotiated better. Saying that we make great money and be glad for what get. That's the type of talk that would have us making less then what we make now. Or just say be happy you have a job or be happy your not getting whipped. That's the type of talk that keeps the negativity going.You may be right Piedmont and when I get you elected as GP you can make that call. The IBT is frustrated with chickenpoop leaders who sit on their hands when they should be speaking up. To go back to the safety of their locals (89) and talk tough isn't my kind of leadership. Rejecting this TA for legit reasons is one thing but did you know L89 wants their members to be paid from the time they park their cars. I know they have a huge building and need to park a good distance but my grandmother took a friggin bus to work, maybe she should have had the mighty Zuckerman fighting for her. Rejecting this TA will cost a boatload more than accepting it. If we reject and go back, pt's will lose big.
You may be right Piedmont and when I get you elected as GP you can make that call. The IBT is frustrated with chickenpoop leaders who sit on their hands when they should be speaking up. To go back to the safety of their locals (89) and talk tough isn't my kind of leadership. Rejecting this TA for legit reasons is one thing but did you know L89 wants their members to be paid from the time they park their cars. I know they have a huge building and need to park a good distance but my grandmother took a friggin bus to work, maybe she should have had the mighty Zuckerman fighting for her. Rejecting this TA will cost a boatload more than accepting it. If we reject and go back, pt's will lose big.
You are smoking rock to think that FedEx is going to surpass Ups. Ups is a machine and FedEx is based on one man that has lost his edge. FedEx is a company that hopes that we go on strike to get a leg up in the world. Look at it this way when Ups went on strike the government begged ups to settle. If FedEx had some nonunion strike The government would just call Ups. Don't get me wrong Ups treats there customers like sheet. FedEx is not that far off. And show me any big moves FedEx has done besides witching to the us and Europe for ups try to grow. Like I said he has lost is edge.Maybe we understand a little more than others. As stewards Stink, 407 and I along with many others spend much of our time defending members and learning how to use the language to benefit all. We see the improvements others don't. I'm also older than most and don't believe for a second UPS will never lose. Go down a highway some night and count the number of FedEx trucks driving by. Those all used to be UPS Feeders.
What about cell phones??You may be right Piedmont and when I get you elected as GP you can make that call. The IBT is frustrated with chickenpoop leaders who sit on their hands when they should be speaking up. To go back to the safety of their locals (89) and talk tough isn't my kind of leadership. Rejecting this TA for legit reasons is one thing but did you know L89 wants their members to be paid from the time they park their cars. I know they have a huge building and need to park a good distance but my grandmother took a friggin bus to work, maybe she should have had the mighty Zuckerman fighting for her. Rejecting this TA will cost a boatload more than accepting it. If we reject and go back, pt's will lose big.
I get it now, you have to be a steward to see all the positives in this TA. BS.ITG, you are dead on the money!! This seems to be the biggest factor in the contract. As stewards we see much more than just words on paper. This is what we deal with everyday. I'm actually excited to get started on 8/1. Some people just don't get it and that's fine. We still have a job to do beyond their ignorance.
I received 2 letters today,One on the contract and one From the Int'l and hall detailing the Union Dues here in Local 89.
You bring up very valid points regarding Local 89's revolt.. in this instance, it was likely politically motivated and seemed very top-down from what I've read of it. Zuckerman's motives should absolutely be questioned. However, the rank-and-file action against the TA out West and in Ohio and Pennsylvania is very much organic from what I've heard and seen.
If the membership rejects the TA, we absolutely have to discuss the possibility of losing big accounts and that work going elsewhere. UPS has less "rebound capacity" than they did in 1997, with the presence of FedEx Ground and the cutthroat regional carriers that can get the job done for a fraction of the pay while using the 1099 independent contractor scam.
But most of the folks I directly represent on my sort are a lot of the more senior and seasoned part-timers that have families and have been hanging on for the chance to go FT for the last decade. Many of them have more than ten or twelve years of service and aren't even half-way there to getting into a package car to take advantage of the additional $10,000 in wages "based on a 46-hour workweek at the end of the new agreement." And when they do get their shot, they're going to miss out on $15,000 more in wages from being in progression yet another year; our supplement did not address this.
Our 22.3 jobs are not being bidded out once vacated - they're being sent to other states where it's more convenient for the company to fill them at an air hub. The language keeping these jobs within the local they were created in was in the IBT's opening proposals, but ended up on the scrap heap.
I can't look these people in the eye and tell them they're getting a good deal with this contract.
No actually you don't. You also have a choice to not be a close minded negative TDU old guard cheerleader creating fear for no reason. You should see things how they exactly are, not worse. Then see it can be better than it is. Then make it better than you see it. That's the recipe of success.I get it now, you have to be a steward to see all the positives in this TA. BS.ITG, you are dead on the money!! This seems to be the biggest factor in the contract. As stewards we see much more than just words on paper. This is what we deal with everyday. I'm actually excited to get started on 8/1. Some people just don't get it and that's fine. We still have a job to do beyond their ignorance.
Who are you calling "CLOSED MINDED"? I was for this TA when the first few details came out like pay increases and pension and health contribution raises.No actually you don't. You also have a choice to not be a close minded negative TDU old guard cheerleader creating fear for no reason. You should see things how they exactly are, not worse. Then see it can be better than it is. Then make it better than you see it. That's the recipe of success.
But you and the TDU old guard need to create this fear for your next election. Your negativity has zero to do the with actual contract as it is to create a diversion to divide.
Take article 6 section 6:
No employee shall be discharged if such discharge is based solely upon information received from GPS or any successor system unless he/she engages in dishonesty (defined for the purposes of this paragraph as any intentional act or omission by an employee where he/she intends to defraud the Company). The Company must confirm by direct observation or other corroborating evidence any other violations warranting discharge.
If you can't see how we as Teamsters can use this to deter discipline, then you need more help than I thought. Or it just proves to me that you are a paid TDU troll as 407 first said. So let the big boys handle the important stuff. You can stick to painting that yellow stripe down your back everyday.
Btw,
Ken P TDU president 1976
James Hoffa IBT President 1999
Who is the old guard?