Dana White posts video of FedEx worker throwing packages into truck in NYC

[Just A UPS Guy]

Let me tell you something Mr. Wise Buttocks ( can't use the A word here) about not rushing to judgement.
A few years back my family sued the township road district. In order to satisfy the demands of the property owner on the other side of the road they made major changes to the road despite the warnings given by my family regarding it's territorial right of way.

And like you and the other know it all laymen on this page in this case the surrounding know it all laymen laughed and ridiculed at our decision to sue. Of course they knew more than we did despite our having made it clear to them the existence of a key piece of evidence. They on the other hand had all the answers.

That key piece of evidence was a 1911 Kirk survey map. The result of a thorough analysis of the map both by hand and by computer the Kirk survey map was proven to be accurate within 1 foot for every 1992 feet...less than feet per mile and proved conclusively that the township had moved the road more than 18 feet outside of it's lawful right of way.

Now what was the response from the critics and pundits.. you know people like yourselves? Absolute silence. It completely shut them up.

Like the line from the Stan Ridgeway song "Camouflage"....."Things are never quite the way they seem".

And the same might hold true when it comes to the White video. So when it comes to matters of law and litigation? Don't be so quick in your rush to judgement.

Yeah, the two are completely comparable, I see your stance now.

Foh

 

[Thebrownblob]

You asked which one of us were lawyers and I provided a lawyer's perspective and now you're saying a judge can you not keep your damn story straight. You keep moving the goal posts because you keep getting called out for being an idiot. Just because you're changing the narrative of this thread does not change that fact. And it would never get to a judge according to lawyers who know what the hell they're talking about. There's nothing about my mind's eye about this at all quit being stupid and realize you're completely wrong on this matter.

He’s having a @bacha29 mental episode.

 

[Brown Down]

None of you guys are lawyers and neither am I BUT here you have a very wealthy man who had zero interest economic or otherwise in what that worker was doing. It was a matter strictly between the worker, the worker's job performance and the employer. Mr. White was a nonaffiliated third party with no vested interest in any form regarding the matter.

No shortage of civil rights attorneys out there who might want to have a go at it considering Mr. White's personal wealth. Unfortunately, being that FDX is a nonunion zero employee workplace rights company what it did to this worker should serve as a reminder that working for FDX is not employment but rather it's servitude whereby migrant farm workers have better rights under the law than today's FDX blue collar worker.

I'm laughing at you. A common layman with no juris degree and a control freak trying to predict the outcome of this matter. The odds do favor the worker not pursuing the matter. However given the high level of public exposure given the matter it might just capture the attention of the ACLU or SPLC or other civil rights organizations who see a case here worth pursing and contacts the worker.

Are you a licensed, practicing attorney with a juris degree who has taken the bar exam in one or more states? Yes or no? If the answer is no then I suggest that you quit embarrassing yourself with your strictly layman's knowledge.

Are you a licensed practicing attorney with a juris degree and have taken the bar exam in one of more states? If not then the laugh's on you. There are several highly qualified civil rights organizations such as the ACLU and the SPLC who may of may not discover a civil rights case here and take up the mantle.

So again. I brought in peoples opinions that are everything you asked here and yet you still argue and say they are wrong and you know bwttwe than them. and now try and change the narrative again to need to be a judge. Will next be a supreme Court judge?

 

[bacha29]

You asked which one of us were lawyers and I provided a lawyer's perspective and now you're saying a judge can you not keep your damn story straight. You keep moving the goal posts because you keep getting called out for being an idiot. Just because you're changing the narrative of this thread does not change that fact. And it would never get to a judge according to lawyers who know what the hell they're talking about. There's nothing about my mind's eye about this at all quit being stupid and realize you're completely wrong on this matter.

Until it is determined that the worker who was filmed and lost his job was not denied an opportunity to seek redress and justice then it is still an open matter. Furthermore you're basing you're argument on an observation of a third party lawyer not directly involved in the matter nor at least based on what you've said submitted that observation as a matter of record.

 

[Brown Down]

Until it is determined that the worker who was filmed and lost his job was not denied an opportunity to seek redress and justice then it is still an open matter. Furthermore you're basing you're argument on an observation of a third party lawyer not directly involved in the matter nor at least based on what you've said submitted that observation as a matter of record.

You are a complete idiot and I highly doubt you've ever filed a lawsuit or been involved in one with that comment. I presented that video and what you said to these lawyers they looked at the exact same thing that any lawyer that would try to take this case would look at sort of talking to the employee themselves. And they said there is absolutely no case for what you are saying.
But then again it doesn't fit your damn narrative so it must be wrong. Completely moronic is what you are

 

[Thebrownblob]

Until it is determined that the worker who was filmed and lost his job was not denied an opportunity to seek redress and justice then it is still an open matter. Furthermore you're basing you're argument on an observation of a third party lawyer not directly involved in the matter nor at least based on what you've said submitted that observation as a matter of record.

Hur Duhr redress reeeee reeeeee

 

[bacha29]

So again. I brought in peoples opinions that are everything you asked here and yet you still argue and say they are wrong and you know bwttwe than them. and now try and change the narrative again to need to be a judge. Will next be a supreme Court judge?

Exactly, just the opinions of ordinary citizens. People with no proven expertise or recognition by the courts.

 

[Thebrownblob]

Until it is determined that the worker who was filmed and lost his job was not denied an opportunity to seek redress and justice then it is still an open matter. Furthermore you're basing you're argument on an observation of a third party lawyer not directly involved in the matter nor at least based on what you've said submitted that observation as a matter of record.

And if anyone needs to redress, wouldn’t it be FedEx? They didn’t have to fire him.

 

[Brown Down]

Exactly, just the opinions of ordinary citizens. People with no proven expertise or recognition by the courts.

They're freaking lawyers you maroon. When's the defense attorney and the other one actually is a lawyer for a corporation to deal with lawsuits against them. This is their damn job in a nutshell. They are not ordinary citizens with no proven expertise and are absolutely recognized by the courts. At this point I don't think you can be any dumber with this stuff

 

[bacha29]

You are a complete idiot and I highly doubt you've ever filed a lawsuit or been involved in one with that comment. I presented that video and what you said to these lawyers they looked at the exact same thing that any lawyer that would try to take this case would look at sort of talking to the employee themselves. And they said there is absolutely no case for what you are saying.
But then again it doesn't fit your damn narrative so it must be wrong. Completely moronic is what you are

So a lawyer talked to the affected individual? So just who might that lawyer be?

 

[Just A UPS Guy]

At this point I don't think you can be any dumber with this stuff

I wouldn't sell him short...

 

[Brown Down]

So a lawyer talked to the affected individual? So just who might that lawyer be?

They don't have to talk to the damn person if there's a video showing what the employee did it says the story right there there is absolutely no reason to do what that employee did so there would be no evidence that the employee could give that would change the video. And I believe the lawyers would say what else could have caused that if they would have seen anything. Again these people do this for a living this is their jobs and you were trying to say that they are completely wrong at their jobs. So you know a lawyer's job better than a lawyer I thought we were all just layman. Didn't realize you managed to get a degree within 3 days and passedthe bar. That has to be some kind of record

 

[Thebrownblob]

I wouldn't sell him short...

@bacha29 says…..

 

[Thebrownblob]

They're freaking lawyers you maroon. When's the defense attorney and the other one actually is a lawyer for a corporation to deal with lawsuits against them. This is their damn job in a nutshell. They are not ordinary citizens with no proven expertise and are absolutely recognized by the courts. At this point I don't think you can be any dumber with this stuff

Apparently other lawyers feel the same because I haven’t seen any lawsuit no redress yet

 

[Brown Down]

Apparently other lawyers feel the same because I haven’t seen any lawsuit no redress yet

I could probably ask every lawyer that actually deals with any lawsuits on my route and I would get the exact same answer. Hell I could even talk to some of my land contract lawyer clients and they would even look at it and laugh.

 

[bacha29]

They're freaking lawyers you maroon. When's the defense attorney and the other one actually is a lawyer for a corporation to deal with lawsuits against them. This is their damn job in a nutshell. They are not ordinary citizens with no proven expertise and are absolutely recognized by the courts. At this point I don't think you can be any dumber with this stuff

But are they licensed to practice law in the state where this incident occurred ? You guys keep bringing up generalized responses but lack specifics. You base everything on White's video alone. The affected worker has his side of the story but you people keep failing to hear his side. Passing your judgement despite being unqualified solely on one piece of evidence presented by just one bystander who happened to be driving by.

 

[Brown Down]

But are they licensed to practice law in the state where this incident occurred ? You guys keep bringing up generalized responses but lack specifics. You base everything on White's video alone. The affected worker has his side of the story but you people keep failing to hear his side. Passing your judgement despite being unqualified solely on one piece of evidence presented by just one bystander who happened to be driving by.

And again the goal poster supposed to stay where they start at not be moved every time you lose an argument. You do understand this right this is why this is pointless with you. You have proven my point so many times in this threat it's not even funny

 

[Just A UPS Guy]

But are they licensed to practice law in the state where this incident occurred ? You guys keep bringing up generalized responses but lack specifics. You base everything on White's video alone. The affected worker has his side of the story but you people keep failing to hear his side. Passing your judgement despite being unqualified solely on one piece of evidence presented by just one bystander who happened to be driving by.

You're dumb af.

 

[bacha29]

I could probably ask every lawyer that actually deals with any lawsuits on my route and I would get the exact same answer. Hell I could even talk to some of my land contract lawyer clients and they would even look at it and laugh.

If they are uncompensated lawyers not retained to represent either side then what they have to offer means nothing.

 

[Just A UPS Guy]

At this point I don't think you can be any dumber with this stuff

I wouldn't sell him short...

But are they licensed to practice law in the state where this incident occurred ? You guys keep bringing up generalized responses but lack specifics. You base everything on White's video alone. The affected worker has his side of the story but you people keep failing to hear his side. Passing your judgement despite being unqualified solely on one piece of evidence presented by just one bystander who happened to be driving by.

Told you.