Disgusted Union Members = Trump Vs. Hillary

[IVE GOTTA PACKAGE 4U]

And Whats considered disabled is pretty liberal if you ask me.

Maybe the government could make a deal with some of the companies . They could have them do customer call centers from their own home. No excuses that I don't have transportation or my back hurts.

Get them used to working and gradually cut back there benefits.

 

[IVE GOTTA PACKAGE 4U]

But where is this phantom job? Am I going to split my job and take half a wage so that everyone can work?

No. We need to get the jobs back to our country. That's where the jobs are going to come from.

 

[Brownslave688]

But where is this phantom job? Am I going to split my job and take half a wage so that everyone can work?

You're paying for them in taxes anyway....

 

[Brownslave688]

But where is this phantom job? Am I going to split my job and take half a wage so that everyone can work?

I honestly can't say I know anyone that wants a job that doesn't have one.


I've never in my life looked more than 2 weeks for a job. Sometimes it ain't pretty but it's a job.

 

[Ms.PacMan]

Maybe the government could make a deal with some of the companies . They could have them do customer call centers from their own home. No excuses that I don't have transportation or my back hurts.

Get them used to working and gradually cut back there benefits.

Corporations are already asking for govt hand outs to train employees in a trade instead of training employees themselves.

They do this now. It's called welfare to work and was a bill introduced by GW and finally passed by congress when Clinton was president.

 

[IVE GOTTA PACKAGE 4U]

Corporations are already asking for govt hand outs to train employees in a trade instead of training employees themselves.

They do this now. It's called welfare to work and was a bill introduced by GW and finally passed by congress when Clinton was president.

What are our other options?

 

[UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)]

Corporations are already asking for govt hand outs to train employees in a trade instead of training employees themselves.

They do this now. It's called welfare to work and was a bill introduced by GW and finally passed by congress when Clinton was president.

It is cheaper in the long run for all involved, including the taxpayers.

 

[realbrown1]

Next generation born year after year. After 2 years they can re-apply. Never ending cycle. Why work when the government give them all they need. Which is why the democrats appeal to those demographics. Here depend on the government
Its free. Which is why the middle class is disappearing

It's also part of the reason our infrastructure is falling apart.

We only have a certain amount of money available for roads, bridges, parks and airports unless we print more money because we are gIving our money to the career welfare bums.

 

[Ms.PacMan]

What are our other options?

The options are to create jobs which would ultimately lower wages (because we all know that corporations and shareholders are not giving up their wages/dividends).

Or as Brownslave pointed out - breaking the cycle with welfare children which requires intervention from the rest of society and govt spending on social programs.

The amount spent on welfare is insignificant compared to the rest of the budget.

 

[10 point]

Corporations are already asking for govt hand outs to train employees in a trade instead of training employees themselves.

They do this now. It's called welfare to work and was a bill introduced by GW and finally passed by congress when Clinton was president.

In the 1990s we were told that UPS was the largest employer of welfare-to-work employees in the US. I'm not quite sure how well that worked out... at $8 an hour.

 

[UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)]

In the 1990s we were told that UPS was the largest employer of welfare-to-work employees in the US. I'm not quite sure how well that worked out... at $8 an hour.

We have turned our attention to hiring veterans.

 

[IVE GOTTA PACKAGE 4U]

The options are to create jobs which would ultimately lower wages (because we all know that corporations and shareholders are not giving up their wages/dividends).

Or as Brownslave pointed out - breaking the cycle with welfare children which requires intervention from the rest of society and govt spending on social programs.

The amount spent on welfare is insignificant compared to the rest of the budget.

Number one...I don't care how small the amount of money is. It is not fair to the est of us.

Number two...if you don't participate in society, you don't deserve to get anything.


Number three we can't keep sweeping the problems under the rug.


More to follow later. I can only be so serious on a Sunday .

 

[10 point]

We have turned our attention to hiring veterans.

That is a great thing and I applaud that!

 

[UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)]

That is a great thing and I applaud that!

...as do I but the sad part is that the welfare issue still needs to be addressed...

 

[gman042]

What the hell are you smoking , Republicrats make up the majority of the house and the Senate. Have a great weekend my Union family .

My mistake.
I think you use the term "Republicrats" wisely. The Democrats hate Trump. The Republicans do not like Trump. The effects would be the same as having a Democratic Congress. Trump will be able to accomplish nothing. Checks and balances will work against him.

 

[10 point]

...as do I but the sad part is that the welfare issue still needs to be addressed...

And when it is we will probably all need concealed carry.

 

[realbrown1]

My mistake.
I think you use the term "Republicrats" wisely. The Democrats hate Trump. The Republicans do not like Trump. The effects would be the same as having a Democratic Congress. Trump will be able to accomplish nothing. Checks and balances will work against him.

You mean the author of THE ART OF THE DEAL won't be able to make deals with congress?

Do tell.

 

[gman042]

You mean the author of THE ART OF THE DEAL won't be able to make deals with congress?

Do tell.

Spite kills all deals.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

You mean the author of THE ART OF THE DEAL won't be able to make deals with congress?

Do tell.

The author of that book isn't running for office.

 

[realbrown1]

Spite kills all deals.

I am sure the ART OF DEAL author can work through it.

I mean Trump has negotiated as many deals as anyone one the planet.

If spite does kill deals, he wouldnt be as successful as he turned out to be.