I did a debate in HS on definition of racist. This was during X gen. Told them they couldn’t be racist because they “technically” were without the power of enforcement. Its just semantics. Wrong is wrong.
Did you really tell a high school debate audience that nothing they do could be considered racist because they don't have "the power of enforcement", whatever that means?
And how can you actually believe "wrong is wrong" if you think something being racist is conditional?