Fascism

It will be fine

Well-Known Member
isnt mail in voting better? regular voting they make you wait a long time. ive never had that here and i live in a big city
I wouldn’t say it’s better. It depends on location. Rural states it makes more sense. Oregon is only mail in voting, has been for years. Where I live there’s weeks of early voting and I’ve never waited more than 1-2 people for voting day of. Republicans when they get control try to eliminate voting locations to make it a greater burden to vote. When turnout is high, they lose.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
I wouldn’t say it’s better. It depends on location. Rural states it makes more sense. Oregon is only mail in voting, has been for years. Where I live there’s weeks of early voting and I’ve never waited more than 1-2 people for voting day of. Republicans when they get control try to eliminate voting locations to make it a greater burden to vote. When turnout is high, they lose.
yea they dont want turn out, its the only way republicans can win.
 

DriveInDriveOut

Inordinately Right
1595703888496.jpg
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
i wonder if theres similarities with the nazi's anti jewish hysteria, and american right wing conspiracy theories which are far from truth.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
chomsky says trump is probably too crooked to be a fascist leader, he wouldnt get enough support. however if an honest fascist came along he thinks he could come to power.
 

DELACROIX

In the Spirit of Honore' Daumier
chomsky says trump is probably too crooked to be a fascist leader, he wouldnt get enough support. however if an honest fascist came along he thinks he could come to power.


"Honest Fascist" granted not too many of them around to choose from..

"Too crooked to be a fascist leader..." so you are saying that Hitler was a OK kind of guy...???
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
He's on RT all the time, homeslice.
yea he doesnt have a show.

ur logic is as bad as the anti election interference logic to begin with. its not to be taken seriously. they never mention allied countries that interfere, they never mention US interference abroad (no other country comes close). and they dont mention rich controlling elections and voter suppression. or hte electoral college. people shouldve been smart enough to clue in that the narrative was BS, but then again these are probably the same people who vote hillary or obama and cant figure out theyre corrupt.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
He's on RT all the time, homeslice.
actually your logic is the same what i just listed. you dont have a problem with allied govt state news like BBC or PBS, but you have a problem when theyre enemies. you are likewise okay with israeli interference in US elections because they are allied, but not enemies.
 

DriveInDriveOut

Inordinately Right

A responding officer says he saw four individuals walking towards a protest with baseball bats. One man was wearing a metal helmet with goggles and military-style gear with multiple pouches, and was carrying an Antifa flag. When the officer pulled his squad car in front of the group, they ran away. The officer caught Banta, who was carrying the flag, and says Banta "dropped into the fetal position and began crying."

lulz
 

oldngray

nowhere special

A responding officer says he saw four individuals walking towards a protest with baseball bats. One man was wearing a metal helmet with goggles and military-style gear with multiple pouches, and was carrying an Antifa flag. When the officer pulled his squad car in front of the group, they ran away. The officer caught Banta, who was carrying the flag, and says Banta "dropped into the fetal position and began crying."

lulz
get.gif
 

Old Man Jingles

Rat out of a cage
theres no infiltrators. the left is still very weak.

the centre has had a loss of support because they support neoliberal economics which is privatize everything and deregulate.

stalin was a right wing deviation. he can call himself a socialist or communist all he likes, but when your a dictator im sure thats right wing.

dems went right of centre i believe starting with reagan, and reagan went far right. this is just by american standards; by every other developed country standards, dems would be a right wing party with their no support of vacation, healthcare, maternity leave, etc.
Stalin was your typical Socialist!

Modern day Socialists be like, "I have a great idea! Let's try what was already tried in Angola, Austria, Armenia, Afghanistan, Albania, Azerbaijan,
Benin, Bessarabia, Bulgaria, Bukavia, Belarus, Burkina Fasso,
Cuba, Cambodia, Congo, China Czeklosavacia,
East Germany, Ethiopia, Estonia,
Finland,
Georgia, Grenada,
Hungary,
Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan,
Iran,
Kumpuchia,
Laos, Latavia, Lithuania,
Madagascar, Mongolia, Mahabad, Macedonia, Marquetalia, Mozambique, Moldovia,
Nicaragua, North Korea,
Poland,
Romania, Russia,
Somalia, Slovakia,
Tajikistan, Turkmenistan,
Ukraine, Uzbekastan,
Vietnam, Venezuela,
Yugoslavia, Yemen,
Zanzibar, Zimbabwe which didn't just fail but catastrophically failed.

With over a 100 million murdered in the last century alone!
But don't worry, that wasn't real Socialism and since we know what we're doing,
though we can't agree on what Socialism is exactly, let alone clearly define it.
Coupled with the fact that we get everything not just wrong but catastrophically wrong
shouldn't stop you from surrendering your rights and liberty
to an overreaching totalitarian central government for the common good.
Because capitalism is evil, immoral unlike we Socialists and our moral supremacy!
 
Top