Fascism

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
What makes someone "far right" to you? At what point do you agree with comrade Ricky that someone is a real deal Nazi and should be castrated against their will? If they believe men can't give birth? If they express interest in actually controlling their country's borders? In not ignoring crime? In keeping men out of women's sports and private spaces?
Far right to me is including a black man in a wheel chair as some sort of point of “ridiculousness” for voting for them. Not the ideology, but specifically pointing out the look
So there's nothing specifically that makes someone a far right Nazi worthy of castration to you? It's just the picture of a black man in a wheelchair that's the issue?
What kind of answer do you want? Are you denying far right is a thing?

I'm asking where you draw a line between right and far right.
 

DriveInDriѵeOut

Inordinately Right
I'm asking where you draw a line between right and far right.
He literally just said criticizing black people is inherently racist. Doesn't matter what they do, they're black and you can't criticize them

Leftism is a cult that functions on an intersectionality hierarchy. You are at the bottom, so you need to shut up and let the people higher up in the pyramid tell you what to think.
 

DriveInDriѵeOut

Inordinately Right
Screenshot_20250220-105049_Chrome.png
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
If they aren't liberals then what are they?
chomskys an anarchist which is to the left

wiki says hedges is socialist / anarchist which is left of liberal

dont know about greenwald. hes against mass surveilance, critical of msm, critical of american forgien policy, called manning a hero. i think hes left wing too based on what i got from chatgpt and his wikipedia. i would say good chance hes a libertarian / socialist
 

Doublestandards

Well-Known Member
He literally just said criticizing black people is inherently racist. Doesn't matter what they do, they're black and you can't criticize them
I know it’s hard for you, but try to not be so stupid all the time

The post was specifically about their looks

If criticizing black people was inherently racist, I wouldn’t say how much the man in your profile picture sucks
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
this is chatgpt with noam chomsky analyzing right wing vs far right wing.

"Yes, Noam Chomsky has discussed the differences between right-wing and far-right politics in various contexts, particularly in his critiques of political systems, ideologies, and the media.


In Chomsky's view, the right-wing typically refers to conservative ideologies that emphasize maintaining traditional social structures, limited government, market-driven economies, and individual freedoms within a framework that often upholds existing power structures. Right-wing politics can include a range of positions, from moderate conservatives to more reactionary elements, but generally, they support a capitalist framework, nationalism, and social hierarchies.


The far-right, on the other hand, is often characterized by more extreme, authoritarian, and anti-democratic tendencies. Far-right ideologies may include a strong embrace of ethno-nationalism, racism, xenophobia, and fascism. They are often marked by a rejection of liberal democracy and a tendency toward dictatorial or ultranationalist rule. The far-right might also involve a rejection of multiculturalism, a desire to curb immigration, and often a disdain for the rights of marginalized communities.


Chomsky contrasts these two categories by emphasizing that while the right-wing may seek to preserve the status quo or implement gradual conservative changes, the far-right seeks more radical, often violent, transformations of society. For example, the far-right may actively seek the dismantling of democratic institutions and the establishment of a more authoritarian or fascist system, whereas right-wing politics might work within the bounds of democratic institutions but still aim for conservative or capitalist reforms.


In his critique of U.S. politics and the global system, Chomsky often stresses that the rise of far-right ideologies represents a significant threat to democratic norms, citing movements that push authoritarianism, racism, and the erosion of civil liberties.


While Chomsky’s focus is usually on critiquing the structures of power (including capitalism and imperialism), he has indeed drawn clear distinctions between the right-wing and far-right, particularly in the context of social, economic, and political consequences."

 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
chomskys an anarchist which is to the left

wiki says hedges is socialist / anarchist which is left of liberal

dont know about greenwald. hes against mass surveilance, critical of msm, critical of american forgien policy, called manning a hero. i think hes left wing too based on what i got from chatgpt and his wikipedia. i would say good chance hes a libertarian / socialist
They are varying degrees of liberal.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Chomsky contrasts these two categories by emphasizing that while the right-wing may seek to preserve the status quo or implement gradual conservative changes, the far-right seeks more radical, often violent, transformations of society. For example, the far-right may actively seek the dismantling of democratic institutions and the establishment of a more authoritarian or fascist system, whereas right-wing politics might work within the bounds of democratic institutions but still aim for conservative or capitalist reforms.
Now take out far-right and insert far-left in the above paragraph.
 
Last edited:

vantexan

Well-Known Member
chomsky and hedges describe liberal class as guys who support reforms to capitalism. they call it political centre

them being socialists mean they cant also be a liberal LOL
There is such a thing as a classic liberal. Today's liberalism isn't that. If you support woke ideology then that's what most liberals today embrace.
 

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
this is chatgpt with noam chomsky analyzing right wing vs far right wing.

"Yes, Noam Chomsky has discussed the differences between right-wing and far-right politics in various contexts, particularly in his critiques of political systems, ideologies, and the media.


In Chomsky's view, the right-wing typically refers to conservative ideologies that emphasize maintaining traditional social structures, limited government, market-driven economies, and individual freedoms within a framework that often upholds existing power structures. Right-wing politics can include a range of positions, from moderate conservatives to more reactionary elements, but generally, they support a capitalist framework, nationalism, and social hierarchies.


The far-right, on the other hand, is often characterized by more extreme, authoritarian, and anti-democratic tendencies. Far-right ideologies may include a strong embrace of ethno-nationalism, racism, xenophobia, and fascism. They are often marked by a rejection of liberal democracy and a tendency toward dictatorial or ultranationalist rule. The far-right might also involve a rejection of multiculturalism, a desire to curb immigration, and often a disdain for the rights of marginalized communities.


Chomsky contrasts these two categories by emphasizing that while the right-wing may seek to preserve the status quo or implement gradual conservative changes, the far-right seeks more radical, often violent, transformations of society. For example, the far-right may actively seek the dismantling of democratic institutions and the establishment of a more authoritarian or fascist system, whereas right-wing politics might work within the bounds of democratic institutions but still aim for conservative or capitalist reforms.


In his critique of U.S. politics and the global system, Chomsky often stresses that the rise of far-right ideologies represents a significant threat to democratic norms, citing movements that push authoritarianism, racism, and the erosion of civil liberties.


While Chomsky’s focus is usually on critiquing the structures of power (including capitalism and imperialism), he has indeed drawn clear distinctions between the right-wing and far-right, particularly in the context of social, economic, and political consequences."


Leftists and comrades can't help but call anything they don't like "far-right" racist, xenophobic or facist. Which is one of the reasons they're not taken very seriously by normal people who are into common sense things.

rfrr.jpeg
 

Doublestandards

Well-Known Member
Leftists and comrades can't help but call anything they don't like "far-right" racist, xenophobic or facist. Which is one of the reasons they're not taken very seriously by normal people who are into common sense things.

View attachment 512450
Are you really going to pretend there’s not a link with far right political views and racism? Do you not read the things posted on this site by the self admitted far right?
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
Leftists and comrades can't help but call anything they don't like "far-right" racist, xenophobic or facist. Which is one of the reasons they're not taken very seriously by normal people who are into common sense things.

View attachment 512450
thats chat gpt describing chomsky's assessment of it

unless youre clueless about the definitions, it seems pretty reasonable that would be what hte far right is considering this is the google result i got of left wing
1740534863621.png


if youre in favor of greater social equality, then it goes to say thats the opposite of racism.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Are you really going to pretend there’s not a link with far right political views and racism? Do you not read the things posted on this site by the self admitted far right?
All you have to do is watch the reactions of Martha's Vineyard residents after DeSantis sent a plane load of illegal immigrants to know the Left talks a good game but when push comes to shove it's very quickly "not in my back yard." Multiple examples of this out there, like the uproar in Westchester County, NY, a very blue county, when subsidized housing for the poor was proposed.
 
Top