FBI Raids Mar-a-lago

[DriveInDriѵeOut]

I’ll say they did. Did they then riot?

 

[DELACROIX]

View attachment 401734View attachment 401733View attachment 401735

All that and more just to get Trump out of office...

 

[newfie]

How many were arrested at Trump's inauguration?

thats when the real Q antifa destroyed a lot of property in DC

 

[Jiangshi]

Today's hearing is going well for Team Trump.

 

[Jiangshi]

ah yes the fictitious bogeyman.

He posted this:

 

[newfie]

View attachment 401734View attachment 401733View attachment 401735

omg @bbsam look at that insurrection trying to prevent a duly elected president from being sworn in.

 

[newfie]

He posted this:

View attachment 401750

one of my favorite pics. the fight with the swamp is not over.

 

[Box Ox]

Today's hearing is going well for Team Trump.

Call up Trump’s lawyers and tell them what you’ve been saying about this all along, @newfie !

Special master to Trump’s lawyers: ‘You can't have your cake and eat it’

Judge Raymond Dearie pushed Trump’s lawyers repeatedly for not backing up the former president’s claim that he declassified the highly sensitive national security-related records discovered in his residence.

www.politico.com

“Judge Raymond Dearie repeatedly challenged Trump’s lawyers for refusing to back up the former president’s claim that he declassified the highly sensitive national security-related records discovered in his residence.“

“Dearie bristled at the effort by Trump’s lawyers to resist his request for proof that Trump actually attempted to declassify any of the 100 documents that the Justice Department recovered from his estate. Without evidence from Trump, Dearie said his only basis to judge the classification level of the records was the fact that they all bear markings designating them as highly sensitive national security secrets — including some that indicate they contain intelligence derived from human sources and foreign intercepts.“

 

[728ups]

Call up Trump’s lawyers and tell them what you’ve been saying about this all along, @newfie !

Special master to Trump’s lawyers: ‘You can't have your cake and eat it’

Judge Raymond Dearie pushed Trump’s lawyers repeatedly for not backing up the former president’s claim that he declassified the highly sensitive national security-related records discovered in his residence.

www.politico.com

“Judge Raymond Dearie repeatedly challenged Trump’s lawyers for refusing to back up the former president’s claim that he declassified the highly sensitive national security-related records discovered in his residence.“

“Dearie bristled at the effort by Trump’s lawyers to resist his request for proof that Trump actually attempted to declassify any of the 100 documents that the Justice Department recovered from his estate. Without evidence from Trump, Dearie said his only basis to judge the classification level of the records was the fact that they all bear markings designating them as highly sensitive national security secrets — including some that indicate they contain intelligence derived from human sources and foreign intercepts.“

They need to get @TearsInRain to testify that Trump had the defacto power to declassify any and all documents.I cant believe Trump's lawyers haven't thought of that!!!

 

[728ups]

I wonder why Trump's lawyers wont declare in the courtroom,under oath that Trump had indeed declassified all of these documents as he claimed he had?

 

[floridays]

I wonder why Trump's lawyers wont declare in the courtroom,under oath that Trump had indeed declassified all of these documents as he claimed he had?

Because they do not think it is an issue to offer a defense for at this stage. They think the burden should be on the government to show he has no right to the documents.

That is the reason.

 

[728ups]

Because they do not think it is an issue to offer a defense for at this stage. They think the burden should be on the government to show he has no right to the documents.

That is the reason.

You need to read the article. The Special Master is asking for specifics on the What,When,Where and How Trump declassified these documents. Trump's lawyers wont state under oath Trump actually declassified these documents. Here let me help:

Judge Raymond Dearie pushed Trump’s lawyers repeatedly for not backing up the former president’s claim that he declassified the highly sensitive national security-related records discovered in his residence.

Trump has argued that the 11,000 documents taken from Mar-a-Lago by the FBI pursuant to a search warrant last month were rightfully in his possession, including about 100 bearing classification markings that suggest they contain some of the nation’s most closely guarded intelligence.
But Dearie bristled at the effort by Trump’s lawyers to resist his request for proof that Trump actually attempted to declassify any of the 100 documents that the Justice Department recovered from his estate. Without evidence from Trump, Dearie said his only basis to judge the classification level of the records was the fact that they all bear markings designating them as highly sensitive national security secrets — including some that indicate they contain intelligence derived from human sources and foreign intercepts.
From the outset of the 40-minute hearing, Dearie signaled that he was determined that Trump’s “litigation strategy” would not interfere with the review Dearie has agreed to do. The judge appeared to be referring to vague assertions of declassification by Trump’s side, without so far any facts to back that up.
“I can’t allow litigation strategy to dictate the outcome of my recommendations to Judge Cannon,” Dearie said.
The judge, a veteran of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, expressed puzzlement about what his role would be if the government says certain documents are classified and Trump’s side disagrees but doesn’t offer proof to challenge that.

 

[DriveInDriѵeOut]

You need to read the article. The Special Master is asking for specifics on the What,When,Where and How Trump declassified these documents. Trump's lawyers wont state under oath Trump actually declassified these documents. Here let me help:

Judge Raymond Dearie pushed Trump’s lawyers repeatedly for not backing up the former president’s claim that he declassified the highly sensitive national security-related records discovered in his residence.

Trump has argued that the 11,000 documents taken from Mar-a-Lago by the FBI pursuant to a search warrant last month were rightfully in his possession, including about 100 bearing classification markings that suggest they contain some of the nation’s most closely guarded intelligence.
But Dearie bristled at the effort by Trump’s lawyers to resist his request for proof that Trump actually attempted to declassify any of the 100 documents that the Justice Department recovered from his estate. Without evidence from Trump, Dearie said his only basis to judge the classification level of the records was the fact that they all bear markings designating them as highly sensitive national security secrets — including some that indicate they contain intelligence derived from human sources and foreign intercepts.
From the outset of the 40-minute hearing, Dearie signaled that he was determined that Trump’s “litigation strategy” would not interfere with the review Dearie has agreed to do. The judge appeared to be referring to vague assertions of declassification by Trump’s side, without so far any facts to back that up.
“I can’t allow litigation strategy to dictate the outcome of my recommendations to Judge Cannon,” Dearie said.
The judge, a veteran of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, expressed puzzlement about what his role would be if the government says certain documents are classified and Trump’s side disagrees but doesn’t offer proof to challenge that.

Are you too embarrassed to link to politico where you copied that opinion from?

 

[728ups]

Are you too embarrassed to link to politico where you copied that opinion from?

its already been posted in this thread. I have confidence you can find it

 

[floridays]

You need to read the article. The Special Master is asking for specifics on the What,When,Where and How Trump declassified these documents. Trump's lawyers wont state under oath Trump actually declassified these documents. Here let me help:

Judge Raymond Dearie pushed Trump’s lawyers repeatedly for not backing up the former president’s claim that he declassified the highly sensitive national security-related records discovered in his residence.

Trump has argued that the 11,000 documents taken from Mar-a-Lago by the FBI pursuant to a search warrant last month were rightfully in his possession, including about 100 bearing classification markings that suggest they contain some of the nation’s most closely guarded intelligence.
But Dearie bristled at the effort by Trump’s lawyers to resist his request for proof that Trump actually attempted to declassify any of the 100 documents that the Justice Department recovered from his estate. Without evidence from Trump, Dearie said his only basis to judge the classification level of the records was the fact that they all bear markings designating them as highly sensitive national security secrets — including some that indicate they contain intelligence derived from human sources and foreign intercepts.
From the outset of the 40-minute hearing, Dearie signaled that he was determined that Trump’s “litigation strategy” would not interfere with the review Dearie has agreed to do. The judge appeared to be referring to vague assertions of declassification by Trump’s side, without so far any facts to back that up.
“I can’t allow litigation strategy to dictate the outcome of my recommendations to Judge Cannon,” Dearie said.
The judge, a veteran of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, expressed puzzlement about what his role would be if the government says certain documents are classified and Trump’s side disagrees but doesn’t offer proof to challenge that.

However, Trusty complained that the former president shouldn’t have to mount a defense now to criminal charges that have yet to be filed.

“It’s not about gamesmanship. It’s about not having seen the documents. ... We are not in a position, nor should we be in a position at this juncture, to fully disclose a substantive defense,” Trusty said. “We shouldn’t have to be in a position to have to disclose declarations and witness statements.”

 

[728ups]

However, Trusty complained that the former president shouldn’t have to mount a defense now to criminal charges that have yet to be filed.

“It’s not about gamesmanship. It’s about not having seen the documents. ... We are not in a position, nor should we be in a position at this juncture, to fully disclose a substantive defense,” Trusty said. “We shouldn’t have to be in a position to have to disclose declarations and witness statements.”

How is showing evidence that the documents had indeed been declassified as the Judge requested " mounting a defense'?
that's absolute nonsense

 

[floridays]

How is showing evidence that the documents had indeed been declassified as the Judge requested " mounting a defense'?
that's absolute nonsense

You are beyond hope.

 

[728ups]

You are beyond hope.

nice deflection and non answer. Trump has claimed from the start he declassified the documents...................why wont his lawyers testify under oath that he did just that?

 

[DriveInDriѵeOut]

its already been posted in this thread. I have confidence you can find it

I found the opinion piece on politico, the question is why you were too embarrassed to link to it.

It's a good start though, you should be embarrassed. Carry on.

 

[floridays]

nice deflection and non answer. Trump has claimed from the start he declassified the documents...................why wont his lawyers testify under oath that he did just that?

They answered the question for you.
I can't help if you are too ignorant to accept it.