FBI Raids Mar-a-lago

vantexan

Well-Known Member
The Special Master is asking Trump's lawyers to Back up claim,Under Oath that the FBI planted evidence. TRump sure spouts alot of stuff at his Rallies and with Hannity but he sure is quiet when he is asked to make these statements Under Oath

The special master assigned to review the documents taken during the August search of Mar-a-Lago is asking former President Trump to back up his claim that the FBI planted evidence on his Florida property.

Judge Raymond Dearie, the special master selected after being out forth by Trump, told his attorneys they would need to submit a sworn declaration that details “a list of any specific items set forth in the [FBI’s] detailed property inventory that plaintiff asserts were not seized from the premises.”

Trump made the insinuation just two days after his home was searched.

“Everyone was asked to leave the premises, they wanted to be alone,” he wrote in a post on his social media platform, “without any witnesses to see what they were doing, taking or, hopefully not, ‘planting.’”

Trump asserted as recently as Wednesday evening during an interview with Fox News’s Sean Hannity that the FBI may have planted evidence during the search.

“The problem that you have is they go into rooms — they won’t let anybody near — they wouldn’t even let them in the same building. Did they drop anything on those piles? Or did they do it later?” he said.

Neither Trump nor his attorneys have supplied any evidence to back such claims.

The plan from Dearie also asked for the attorneys to list a “description of contents or location within the premises where the item was found is incorrect” as well as to break down any property they say was taken during the search but not listed among the FBI’s inventory.

The request marks the second time Dearie has asked the Trump legal team to back its claims.

A Monday filing from Trump’s team indicated Dearie had asked the former president’s lawyers to explain whether he had in fact ever declassified the intelligence records found in his home.

Earlier legal filings from Trump insinuated he may have done so but stopped short of fully making the claim.

Seems like just the other day Dems were wringing their hands over a special master being appointed.
 

728ups

All Trash No Trailer
Seems like just the other day Dems were wringing their hands over a special master being appointed.
seems like you posted the other day the request for a special master may have been a stroke of genius, documents would be excluded from the investigation due to Lawyer/Client privilege...........................boy that sure didnt work out did it?
 

728ups

All Trash No Trailer
307771001_6149866048362961_2356888197272365895_n.jpg
 

728ups

All Trash No Trailer
LMFAO
View attachment 401971
Erm old Boy, noone here is questioning a President's power to declassify, you really need to try harder to keep up.

What is being questioned by the Special master is to why Trump's Lawyers wont testify under oath that Trump declassified these documents when he was President.

We are having quite the conversation in the thread, I do hope you can understand exactly what is being discussed
 

728ups

All Trash No Trailer
so why wont Trump's lawyers Testify under oath that Trump declassified these documents when he was president?

I also like how the 11th court of appeals told Trump to STFU about wild allegations of the FBI planting evidence if he couldn't prove it. That was freaking AWESOME
 

DriveInDriѵeOut

Inordinately Right
so why wont Trump's lawyers Testify under oath that Trump declassified these documents when he was president?
.
LMFAO
You said he didn't.
Then you said he couldn't.
Then you said he did it the wrong way.
Then you said it didn't even matter if he did.
Now you beg me to tell you why his lawyers won't say he did.

Are you tired of carrying around those goal posts yet?
 

floridays

Well-Known Member
I also like how the 11th court of appeals told Trump to STFU about wild allegations of the FBI planting evidence if he couldn't prove it. That was freaking AWESOME
I missed that part and I read the entire opinion, not relying on another party to tell me what they said.

I need you to provide that citation.

The word wild appears zero times, allegation appears twice, planting, zero times.
the word evidence appears eleven times, prove appears zero times.

None having anything remotely related to your statement.

Did you make this up or read or hear someone say it?

I could tell you why they don't appear in the contest you present but I won't.
I'll leave that for you to figure out.
 
Top