The obstruction is still what distinguishes Trump from Biden, because DOJ would most likely charge a Constitutional officer only with 18 USC 793(e), refusing to given classified documents back. Biden has made multiple efforts to give documents back: Trump has made multiple efforts to refuse to give documents back.
OkYou got nothin
obstruction
So did Hillary. What's good for the goose...donald defied a subpoena
Good, nullifying the courts is what we should be doing. Nothing will happen to him. Nothing happens to Democrats either. What’s your point? Presidents have a long history of ignoring court rulings.donald defied a subpoena
Can you provide proof of that statement?So did Hillary. What's good for the goose...
Can you explain why Jim Jordan was so incompetent investigating her?So did Hillary. What's good for the goose...
Because it’s all theater each side takes turnsCan you explain why Jim Jordan was so incompetent investigating her?
As will be the upcoming Hunter/Joe Biden investigations.Because it’s all theater each side takes turns
Can you provide proof it's not true?Can you provide proof of that statement?
So, you have nothing. Got it.Can you provide proof it's not true?
You aren't aware that Hillary was subpoenaed for the server and emails? That she and her aides deleted 33,000 of them? That's not speculation. She said they were personal in nature and no need for the Congressional committee to see them. Not her call to make. And she and her aides smashed the server and the cellphones and blackberries and laptops that she and her staff had sent emails through that server. She was asked by the press about how she wiped the server's hard drive with a program called Bleachbit to insure those 33,000 deleted emails couldn't be retrieved. And yet there were still top secret documents among the 30,000 she did turn over. Really, are you that unaware?So, you have nothing. Got it.
Hillary Clinton was not subpoenaed, her email archive was, and no wrongdoing was found. The documents that were deemed to be TS or Classified were part of email chains, and had no markings on them.You aren't aware that Hillary was subpoenaed for the server and emails? That she and her aides deleted 33,000 of them? That's not speculation. She said they were personal in nature and no need for the Congressional committee to see them. Not her call to make. And she and her aides smashed the server and the cellphones and blackberries and laptops that she and her staff had sent emails through that server. She was asked by the press about how she wiped the server's hard drive with a program called Bleachbit to insure those 33,000 deleted emails couldn't be retrieved. And yet there were still top secret documents among the 30,000 she did turn over. Really, are you that unaware?
I'm not worried about her coming back, I just find it reprehensible that she and Bill used her office and being the presumed next president to peddle influence and get filthy rich. Are you going to tell me that she and Bill weren't flying all over giving speeches for hundreds of thousands of dollars up to even $750k? You think there was no reason why she didn't turn over those 33,000 emails other than they were just personal and family related? It stretches corruption way beyond anything done before to my knowledge, and even the Bidens are amateurs in comparison. Comey clearly stated she violated statutes that for anyone else would've resulted in arrest and prison. It becomes understandable why people like her and Biden think they can be president when their supporters will cover for them no matter what they do.Hillary Clinton was not subpoenaed, her email archive was, and no wrongdoing was found. The documents that were deemed to be TS or Classified were part of email chains, and had no markings on them.
Get over Hillary Clinton. She's not coming back, it reeks of desperation.
![]()
FBI: No evidence Clinton ordered deletion of subpoenaed email archive
“We did not have evidence establish someone told him to do that.”thehill.com
![]()
The FBI Files on Clinton's Emails - FactCheck.org
The FBI's summary of its investigation of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton contradicted some of her past statements about her use of a private email system for government business.www.factcheck.org