From the Brookings Institute:
"The reaction represented by this revolution was prompted, in part,
by the failure of many social programs to achieve their goals. As the noted program evaluator Peter Rossi of the University of Massachusetts in Amherst would have it,
if predictions are based on what is known from scientific evaluations, the expected net impact of any new social intervention is zero. The problems with American social policy, however, run much deeper than the mere failure of a few programs. The American people appear to have rejected some of the most fundamental tenets of liberal social policy, if indeed they ever agreed with them. Consider the following dichotomy. On one side are social programs that provide benefits to people who are not expected by the American public to work. The Social Security programs, which provide cash for the elderly and disabled and their dependents and survivors, lead the list of these popular programs. On the other side are welfare programs for the able-bodied, such as the now defunct AFDC program. These programs are suspect because American taxpayers expect able-bodied adults to support themselves and their families."
https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/workoverwelfare_chapter.pdf
I doubt DIDO knows about, much less has taken advantage of, every single benefit program.
The means-tested welfare system consists of 80+ federal programs providing cash, food, housing, medical care, social services, training, and targeted education aid to poor and low-income Americans.
singlemotherguide.com