Passed by Republican law makers.Unions need to take notice.
If you keep supporting the extremist radical ideologies of the Democrat party, you will lose the support of voters, and there will be more laws like this passed.
Yes, there is back lash against the extremist radical ideologies of the Democrat party, and unions will be a casualty of that if they keep supporting it.Passed by Republican law makers.
I'm willing to hear you out my good friend.Unions are going to continue to fight for workers rights. Y'all can cry about wokeness, beer cans and Tucker. Teamsters are not going anywhere.
After what happened to this city I generally believe the idea that narratives become reality via social conditioning. There is no real way to combat it. Be careful what you wish for.Yes, there is back lash against the extremist radical ideologies of the Democrat party, and unions will be a casualty of that if they keep supporting it.
Not until Florida Man is removedBest state ever.
Understandable and I am nowhere near tribal on any aspect. A lot of this conversation was about card check. Naturally, it’s much more convenient especially for the member for the dues to come directly out of your check. And that’s usually negotiated item in a contract. The main idea here was that not having it destroys the ability for unions to exist, which I don’t really agree with. It makes it more inconvenient yes. Florida taking away card check from some of the contracts does not mean they will not be a union. And I think I stated I’m certain there will be lawsuits to decide if what they did was legal or not.
As to whether or not public unions should exist, my opinion, is everyone should have the right to have a voice and respect in the workplace.
It’s important to remember that when one side has too much power in negotiations, it gets away from the main point of representation, which is fairness, so that both sides can flourish in the life of a contract.
The public pension, issue is a good example of what happens when politicians kick the can down the road for the next group, leaving the taxpayers on the hook for promises made that can’t be kept. And the members retirement shaky. My main thesis is that public union contracts should be negotiated differently, and not with the group of politicians, who may only have political aspirations as their motives. It eventually destroys both sides.
ec 201716 pensions when states default
This Commentary discusses how a severe fiscal crisis at the state level could impact the interests of the state’s public pension holders. Drawing lessons from the relevant laws, historical precedents, and the case of Arkansas after its default in 1933, I argue that in spite of the protections...www.clevelandfed.org
How Politicians Hurt Your Public Pension Plan
www.gsb.stanford.edu
I'm willing to hear you out my good friend.
Please explain why you agree with the teacher's unions that pornography should be in elementary schools, and teachers should keep children's "gender identity" secret from their parents.
Use your words and explain why you think the teacher's union is right about those things.
Should the taxpayers be responsible for the administrative cost of union membership fee deductions though?
Understandable and I am nowhere near tribal on any aspect. A lot of this conversation was about card check. Naturally, it’s much more convenient especially for the member for the dues to come directly out of your check. And that’s usually negotiated item in a contract. The main idea here was that not having it destroys the ability for unions to exist, which I don’t really agree with. It makes it more inconvenient yes. Florida taking away card check from some of the contracts does not mean they will not be a union. And I think I stated I’m certain there will be lawsuits to decide if what they did was legal or not.
As to whether or not public unions should exist, my opinion, is everyone should have the right to have a voice and respect in the workplace.
It’s important to remember that when one side has too much power in negotiations, it gets away from the main point of representation, which is fairness, so that both sides can flourish in the life of a contract.
The public pension, issue is a good example of what happens when politicians kick the can down the road for the next group, leaving the taxpayers on the hook for promises made that can’t be kept. And the members retirement shaky. My main thesis is that public union contracts should be negotiated differently, and not with the group of politicians, who may only have political aspirations as their motives. It eventually destroys both sides.
ec 201716 pensions when states default
This Commentary discusses how a severe fiscal crisis at the state level could impact the interests of the state’s public pension holders. Drawing lessons from the relevant laws, historical precedents, and the case of Arkansas after its default in 1933, I argue that in spite of the protections...www.clevelandfed.org
How Politicians Hurt Your Public Pension Plan
www.gsb.stanford.edu
The unions can't back the right wing, it's impossible... limiting or ending collective bargaining is literally a core conservative belief!Unions need to take notice.
If you keep supporting the extremist radical ideologies of the Democrat party, you will lose the support of voters, and there will be more laws like this passed.
Respect for workers in the workplace always has a place. But when one side has too much power, it destroys the thing they’re trying to achieve which is equity and equality. The UAW almost destroyed their selves that way.
Well this is for public sector unions.
So I imagine the goal would be to shift the administrative cost of deductions to the union and its members, rather than being placed onto every taxpayer.
Any other questions?
They fund today's Democrats electionsNot even FDR wanted public unions. He saw the dangers of it.
You didn't answer the question.I think the florida taxpayers should be far more concerned with the cost of these Disney lawsuits. The possible admin costs to transfer union dues is peanuts compared to that debacle
SMH, that's literally what I already said:Anyway, I just ask you guys to step back from the politics for a minute and reason for yourselves why certain actions are being taken in Florida and elsewhere, if your honest with yourselves you will see that these attacks on unions and Disney are nothing more than political retribution towards gov. Desantis perceived "woke" enemies
Unions need to take notice.
If you keep supporting the extremist radical ideologies of the Democrat party, you will lose the support of voters, and there will be more laws like this passed.