I actually said this
Now would you like to put some other words in my mouth
Read the above and kiss my ass.
You are the only one lying here and it is documented above.
I do know the facts of the case and the convictions tend to support my view.Uh -huh. It helps if you actually know the basic facts of the case.
I do know the facts of the case and the convictions tend to support my view.
Look jackass, I don't need you to tell me what I said, I just copied it verbatimI don't have to put words in your mouth. You said it was passing counterfeit bills. Then you added that it would be theft if he left with items. This was in response to me saying it was theft because he purchased something with the bill, so the police had jurisdiction. It was theft, I was right, you were wrong. It doesn't matter what the clerk reported. He's not a law expert, he reported a crime, the police responded.
Look jackass, I don't need you to tell me what I said, I just copied it verbatim
Do I have to break down exactly what you said I sad and what I actually said.But you said you didn't say the things you said. I'm afraid you might be having a stroke. Seek help.
I actually said thisYou said he didn't receive any goods for his counterfeit bill, so it wasn't theft
No, its passing counterfeit bills. That was what the call was for, not theft. If the salesperson suspected the bill (20) was fake you don't take it and refuse the sale
He bought cigarettes, and the cashier accepted the bill because he thought Floyd was high.
That is precisely what I said.If the purchaser leaves with the item (cigarettes in this case) then you have a shoplifting or theft of goods call to make.
Because it took then a long time to get him in that position. He had been fighting them for like half an hour.He was handcuffed and on his stomach though. I can't see the need to continue kneeling on him once he passed out.
He was saying he couldn't breathe for half an hour, while physically fighting them trying to put him in the police car. He was lying.Seems they should've been looking to give him medical aid once he started saying he couldn't breathe.
They don't.I’m not a medical expert but clearly you are.
So Doctor, why do your fellow Doctors all agree that Floyd died of asphyxiation
He deserved to die because he killed himself by swallowing all of his drugs.And for those crimes he deserved to die right there. Right?
And he kept resisting arrestHe deserved to die because he killed himself by swallowing all of his drugs.
He had been arrested before and cried that he couldn't breathe that time too. It was on video, and the judge prohibited the jury from seeing it.And he kept resisting arrest
And could have been suffering from the effect of the fentanyl he ingested. Do you think that police department and others reviewed their policies on restraining suspects after this incident? Seems to me that cop haters want to put everything on the cops and people who let's say "strongly dislike" minority criminals want to put everything on George Floyd. I think suspects who refuse to comply with lawful orders put themselves in harm's way. And I think short of situations where they must use lethal force cops have a responsibility to insure those in their custody are given every consideration in regards to keeping them alive. Doesn't matter what you or I think though. It matters what a jury thinks after both sides present their arguments. And it would not have come to a jury trial if Chauvin hadn't continued to press down on Floyd for so long. If he and the others had stopped and given first aid then it could have been argued that the knee on the back restraint was standard department policy to subdue uncooperative suspects.He was saying he couldn't breathe for half an hour, while physically fighting them trying to put him in the police car. He was lying.
At what point did Chauvin go too far? At what point what was Floyd subdued enough that he could have gotten off his neck and arrrested him while alive?And could have been suffering from the effect of the fentanyl he ingested. Do you think that police department and others reviewed their policies on restraining suspects after this incident? Seems to me that cop haters want to put everything on the cops and people who let's say "strongly dislike" minority criminals want to put everything on George Floyd. I think suspects who refuse to comply with lawful orders put themselves in harm's way. And I think short of situations where they must use lethal force cops have a responsibility to insure those in their custody are given every consideration in regards to keeping them alive. Doesn't matter what you or I think though. It matters what a jury thinks after both sides present their arguments. And it would not have come to a jury trial if Chauvin hadn't continued to press down on Floyd for so long. If he and the others had stopped and given first aid then it could have been argued that the knee on the back restraint was standard department policy to subdue uncooperative suspects.
Good question. What's your opinion? I think he was already arrested but refused to comply with lawful orders. Thus the knee on the back. How can you put everything completely on Chauvin? I'm betting that's a technique no longer used though. It's sad that it came to that but how many suspects over the years ended up dead because they refused to comply with lawful orders? As I've already said I'm certain those cops wished they had handled that situation differently.At what point did Chauvin go too far? At what point what was Floyd subdued enough that he could have gotten off his neck and arrrested him while alive?
I actually said this
That is precisely what I said.
Obviously my post came before yours because you felt the need to say I said something I never did.