I don't know. I'm a dumb liberal so you tell me.
You mean the jury that lived in a city ravaged by BLM riots? The jury that wasn't sequestered during the trial? The jury that had to drive through protests everyday to get to the courthouse? That jury?
Yes.
They're not doctors. They knew how long it would take for paramedics to get there and administer proper care. But guess what.... the ambulance went to the wrong address.
You realize people overdosing wake up and immediately fight. I've explained this to you buddy.
That's the system we have. Didn't one of the jurors admit they were a BLM activist after the trial? Certainly Chauvin's lawyers are working on an appeal. But it does seem to me we have two camps here. Either Floyd was completely responsible for his own death or the cops were.
How many times must I agree that Chauvin took it too far? Seems to me if you keep bringing up the cops' culpability over and over you really only see them as responsible, not Floyd. Dishonest discourse.
We have sequestering for a reason.
Yes.
No, the federal government came after him for stupid hate crime nonsense, even though the prosecution in the trial made ZERO claims of racism.
So did Chauvin intentionally or negligently contribute to Floyd’s death in your opinion?
I think Chauvin had every right to do what his department trained him to do. He just went too far. There is such a thing as depraved indifference. Cops are trained in first aid and it seems to me if a suspect you have your knee on has passed out and is releasing urine you might want to take the knee off and check his vital signs. I still think all those people screaming at the cops contributed to Chauvin continuing to keep the knee on. He wasn't going to let civilians tell him what to do imo. And he paid for it.
And I'm saying you're in the camp that believes the cops were entirely responsible. For you to say "how many times can I...." is totally disingenuous imo.
Some combination of both.
Do you think about men sucking dick often?So don't question the police?
This is not a binary decision even if you demand it.
And I agree up to a point. It's the same for cops as it is for suspects. If you don't want to be criminally prosecuted make sure everything you do is with department policy and never, ever let your emotions get in the way.
That doesn't make any sense buddy.
If you say so. But you keep demanding that we convict the cops here. Doesn't appear you truly believe both sides were culpable. Out of curiosity, how do you feel about all the D.A.'s around the country who are refusing to prosecute suspects for various crimes? With crime spiking in their districts because of it? By the way, saw the other day those districts add up to about 70 million people so close to one in five Americans are negatively impacted.
Taking it too far isn't following policy. Do you think when he was trained in using that technique they didn't tell him to monitor the suspect closely for any negative health reaction? And it's my opinion only, but I think he took it too far because of everyone yelling at him to get off. He was showing who was the boss. Something I do think quite a few cops would have done. I do believe cops have a very difficult job but I think a lot of people have met cops with bad attitudes.
