George W. Bush
- Thread starter moreluck
- Start date
Upsmule
Well-Known Member
I swear. The utter BILE these parrots spew about "war criminals" is comical at best.
Their precious tolerant/gay/community organizer/hypocrite politician/ Marxist barry Soetoro
Is even more guilty of what they accuse Bush of....
Upsmule
Well-Known Member
So when do you "tolerant" Bush "Haters" begin the head hunting of these leaders as well....?
United Kingdom
(2004 – 2009)Australia
(2004 – 2009)Poland
(2004 – 2008)Ukraine
(2004 – 2008)Georgia
(2004 – 2008)Bulgaria
(2004 – 2008)Denmark
(2004 – 2007)Italy
(2004 – 2006)Spain
(2004 – 2004)
728ups
All Trash No Trailer
728ups
All Trash No Trailer
more bile coming from the resident Racist Homophobe.
728ups
All Trash No Trailer
The 'ineptness' part is made up,lets not play coy shall we?. The economy is ROARING back due to Obama's policies,his drone strikes are killing Al Queada and Taliban leaders ,anm=d he got us out of that stupid,uleless war in Iraq that FIVE THOUSAND american lives and BILLIONS of US Dollars. If you call that'inept' i'll have three servings please
Last edited:
728ups
All Trash No Trailer
Multiple studies link extreme conservatism to racism and low IQ.
just sayin
Multiple Scientific Studies Confirm: Extreme Conservatism Linked To Racism And Low I.Q. - Americans Against the Tea Party
Multiple Scientific Studies Confirm: Extreme Conservatism Linked To Racism And Low I.Q.
AATTP April 23, 2013
An article published at Psychology Today by Goal Auzeen Saedi, Ph.D. of Millennial Media writes about the correlation between far right-wing conservatism, low intelligence and racism.
Saedi writes,
Professor Parker, interviewed by Chris Matthews says,
Americans Against the Tea Party reported on this very subject when a white, racist TEApublican CPAC attendee suggested that slavery wasn’t so bad, and that blacks should be thankful they were given food and shelter while they were slaves.
Here’s the interview of Professor Parker by Chris Matthews
So the next time you’re criticized for pointing out that conservative TEAvangelicals, TEApublicans and Libertarian-types are unintelligent, racist sociopaths – you can say, “It’s a scientific fact.” Of course they don’t believe in science either.
And just for good measure:
just sayin
Multiple Scientific Studies Confirm: Extreme Conservatism Linked To Racism And Low I.Q. - Americans Against the Tea Party
Multiple Scientific Studies Confirm: Extreme Conservatism Linked To Racism And Low I.Q.
AATTP April 23, 2013
inShare4
An article published at Psychology Today by Goal Auzeen Saedi, Ph.D. of Millennial Media writes about the correlation between far right-wing conservatism, low intelligence and racism.
Saedi writes,
“Hodson and Busseri (2012) found in a correlational study that lower intelligence in childhood is predictive of greater racism in adulthood, with this effect being mediated (partially explained) through conservative ideology. They also found poor abstract reasoning skills were related to homophobic attitudes which was mediated through authoritarianism and low levels of intergroup contact.”
We checked the study Hodson and Busseri study, and the abstract certainly does say,
“Despite their important implications for interpersonal behaviors and relations, cognitive abilities have been largely ignored as explanations of prejudice. We proposed and tested mediation models in which lower cognitive ability predicts greater prejudice, an effect mediated through the endorsement of right-wing ideologies (social conservatism, right-wing authoritarianism) and low levels of contact with out-groups. In an analysis of two large-scale, nationally representative United Kingdom data sets (N = 15,874), we found that lower general intelligence (g) in childhood predicts greater racism in adulthood, and this effect was largely mediated via conservative ideology. A secondary analysis of a U.S. data set confirmed a predictive effect of poor abstract-reasoning skills on antihomosexual prejudice, a relation partially mediated by both authoritarianism and low levels of intergroup contact. All analyses controlled for education and socioeconomic status. Our results suggest that cognitive abilities play a critical, albeit underappreciated, role in prejudice. Consequently, we recommend a heightened focus on cognitive ability in research on prejudice and a better integration of cognitive ability into prejudice models.”
A January 2012 article in the Journal Live Science also cites the Hodsdon-Busseri study,
“There’s no gentle way to put it: People who give in to racism and prejudice may simply be dumb…Low-intelligence adults tend to gravitate toward socially conservative ideologies. Those ideologies, in turn, stress hierarchy and resistance to change, attitudes that can contribute to prejudice.”
Indeed, University of Washington Political Science Professor Christopher Parker, author of the new book ‘Change They Can’t Believe In: The Tea Party and Reactionary Politics in America’ agrees.
Professor Parker, interviewed by Chris Matthews says,
“What we’ve found out, we’ve come up with something that we called Reactionary Conservatism. What that means is, where as a regular conservative or a more mainstream conservative recognizes change is necessary to avoid revolutionary change, a reactionary conservative actually wants to go back in time. In the book we tie the Tea Party to the Know Nothing party of the 1850s, the Clan of the 1920s, the John Birch Society of the late 1950s and 1960s. It’s the same belief system, Chris, this idea that they’re scared of losing the America that they know and love to these other groups of people.”
Americans Against the Tea Party reported on this very subject when a white, racist TEApublican CPAC attendee suggested that slavery wasn’t so bad, and that blacks should be thankful they were given food and shelter while they were slaves.
Here’s the interview of Professor Parker by Chris Matthews
Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
So the next time you’re criticized for pointing out that conservative TEAvangelicals, TEApublicans and Libertarian-types are unintelligent, racist sociopaths – you can say, “It’s a scientific fact.” Of course they don’t believe in science either.
And just for good measure:
moreluck
golden ticket member
Have you looked at the stock market the past 2 days???? Roaring back? Yeah, below 15,000 !!! Food stamp usage highest in history! People laying back and letting the gov't take care of them instead of standing on their own 2 feet.
The economy is roaring back......why? Because HE says so......lol!!! Have you made a list of his business picks........he's a loser (Solynda, Fiskar and the likes)
728ups
All Trash No Trailer
ok,how many times during the Dubya presidency did the stock market even come CLOSE to 15,000?????? The past couple of days have been less than positive in the Market,but OVERALL since Obama's inaguaration the stock market has shown signifigant gains, You have posted many stupid things that make me laugh,but THIS post tops it!
I cant seem to remember the Market doing so well because of Dubya, howzabout the COMPLETE tanking of the economy due to good ole Dubya's policies? Here are a few facts you might like to ponder. I know you conservatives hate facts and science
Former United States Secretary of Labor Robert Reich said the fall in stock prices since Obama's inauguration was caused by the policies of former President George W. Bush, and that the housing and financial bubbles, as well as the decline in the stock market, all began under Bush's Presidency.[SUP][17][/SUP]
Justin Fox of Time magazine points at eight major economic mistakes George W. Bush made: 1) A return to deficit spending, 2) Iraq, 3) Tax cuts for the rich, 4) Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 5) Encouraging consumer spending, 6) The lack of an energy policy, 7) State of denial, and 8) A muddled first bailout by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson.[SUP][18][/SUP]
In 2005, Congressman Ron Paul (R-Texas) said section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (2002) which requires chief executive officers to certify the accuracy of financial statements caused capital flight away from the U.S. stock market.[SUP][19][/SUP] Later in 2008, Paul said that the government bailouts of badly run corporations was rewarding bad behavior and punishing good behavior, and that it prevented resources from being allocated away from inefficient uses to more productive uses, and that this lowered the overall amount of wealth across the entire economy.[SUP][20][/SUP]
In March 2009 White House budget director Peter Orszag said, "Job losses began in January 2008. The stock market started declining October 2007.... This has been, you know, eight years in the making, and again, it's going to take some time to work our way out of it." [SUP][21][/SUP]
island1fox
Well-Known Member
Five years later everything bad is still Bushe's fault. When stock market rises because Companies --like UPS cut costs and eliminate jobs --along with the government printing money --which will bring another disaster --Obama is a hero ???
moreluck
golden ticket member
Conditions are different month by month, so you can't compare...........
Bush WAS president and no longer is president.
This is 2013.......Bush is in the past. The present is Obama.......................yet you choose to dwell in the past...
728ups
All Trash No Trailer
I vastly prefer the present and future! : troops out of Iraq, The Economy doing well,The Afghani War winding down,The Housing Market rebounding .......ALL the credit goes to President Obama.
728ups
All Trash No Trailer
I'm confident in 5 or 6 years we will be PRAISING President Obama over saving the country from the Republicans
moreluck
golden ticket member
Yeah, I been waiting since 2008 for him to close Gitmo like he promised........instead he built them a lighted soccer field. Something about cutting the deficit in half too.........
FAIL !!!!
Obama & jobs.........facts please!
728ups
All Trash No Trailer
facts? here ya go:
New Data Show Net Job Growth Under Barack Obamahere is an excerpt from that link
In other words, 125,000 jobs have been created, in total, during Obama's first term, compared with a prior estimate of a loss of 261,000.
This is obviously a very small difference, but it takes away a weapon that former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, the Republican nominee for president, has used repeatedly to hit Obama: the claim that there has been a net job loss since he took office.
That claim was arguably unfair in any event, given the state of the economy whenObama took on the worst job in America: The economy was shedding about 750,000 jobs per month just before and after his inauguration. With the new benchmark revisions, it added about 194,000 jobs per month in the year up to March 2012, according to Wharton economics professor Justin Wolfers.
Similar threads
