realbrown1
Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
We shouldn't subsidize any company.Or subsidize them for continuing the ruination.
We shouldn't subsidize any company.Or subsidize them for continuing the ruination.
Agreed.We shouldn't subsidize any company.
Agreed.
Their behavior should be incented via Tax Credits but no subsidizing.
Subsidization occurs regardless of tax status.Difference?
Less $ to buy their products?How is taxing the American People going to stop India & China from continuing to let their polluting industries grow ?
These growing industries are for their domestic markets .Less $ to buy their products?
Without the American consumer, China and India would have no growing industries.Where is the public outcries about the still growing Nigerian oil spills ?
These growing industries are for their domestic markets .
Subsidization occurs regardless of tax status.
Tax credit only occurs when a company has profits.
That's what I have been saying and the liberal whackos went crazy.
I've been in Germany when it was over 100.From The Weather Channel Android App: http://www.weather.com/forecast/news/europe-heat-wave-record-highs-june-july-2015
Trickle down economics doesn't work but the conservatives keep tying it instead of changing their position.That's what I have been saying and the liberal whackos went crazy.
To them, this is settled.
You can't disagree.
They are sheep, just agreeing with what their liberal LEADERS tell them to agree to.
Have you ever seen one of the liberals on here EVER admit they were wrong on something?
You never will either.
That the difference, I believe, with the conservatives.
Conservatives will change their position, if proven wrong.
Liberals will just keep goose stepping to their leaders drumbeat.
The guy quit his job because he disagreed with their stance on climate change.
When's the last time conservatives have tried trickle down economics?Trickle down economics doesn't work but the conservatives keep tying it instead of changing their position.
See.The guy quit his job because he disagreed with their stance on climate change.
He then proceeded to take a job for the Heartland Institute, an organization who not only denies climate change, but also denies that tobacco causes adverse health effects. They are of course funded by tobacco and oil companies.
Why would I accept the opinion of someone who denies that smoking is bad for your health?See.
These libs will NEVER accept a different opinion unless it comes from their LEADERS.
Does he say that?Why would I accept the opinion of someone who denies that smoking is bad for your health?