Rebel said "It is much easier to file and get paid than to try and come up with a solution. It's not up to me to come up with the solution."
Faulty logic as you are assuming there is a problem with Basic. The fact that UPS has any Basic volume means it is NEW business to UPS and it translates in to NEW jobs. UPS never had these packages and never would have themif not for Basic.
If you do not want to see Basic packages in the UPS system as they currently are, that means you do not want new volume and therefor new Teamster jobs.
You can not win these types of packages from the competition without coming up with a unique solution that meets the needs of the customer at a price they are willing to pay. You need to face the reality of the marketplace. Fedex and DHL have lower operating costs which translates in to the ability to offer customers a lower price for their version of Basic. Keep in mind that no Fedex or DHL employees deliver their "basic" packages--they ALL go to the post office for "last mile" delivery--100% of them. No new delivery driver jobs at Fedex or DHL because of their "basic" service but money goes to their bottom line. UPS has added NEW Teamster jobs (full and part time) due to Basic.
If customers that ship Basic (or the competitors equivalent service) were willing to pay the rate of UPS ground residential, or Fedex ground residential or DHL ground residential, don't you think they would? If UPS or the competition could offer a deep enough discount to have those packages in their system AND make a profit, don't you think they would?
Face the reality of the market--residential deliveries cost more to deliver--for all carriers. Customers are looking for the most cost effective way to get their product delivered. Some are willing to pay more for UPS, Fedex and DHL guaranteed ground service. For those customers, UPS can ususally compete pretty well with the other carriers. For customers that want the lowest cost and are not as concerned about guaranteed delivery and time-in-tranist, Fedex and DHL came up with their version of "basic" service (called Smart Post and DHL@Home, respectively). Instead of simply ignoring a new business opportuntiy, UPS developed a solution to win new business and create new jobs.
If you would prefer UPS simply walk away from this potential business and let non-union carriers have this busisness and continue to grow at a faster rate than UPS, then you must not want UPS to grow and the Teamster membership to grow.
You can't have it both ways. If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.