newfie
Well-Known Member
long as he keeps releasing those emails i'm good .
Hilary Clinton
- Thread starter moreluck
- Start date
long as he keeps releasing those emails i'm good .
Babagounj
Strength through joy
Judicial Watch Submits Email Questions to Hillary Clinton – Written Answers, Under Oath, Due September 29 - Judicial Watch
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today announced it submitted questions to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton concerning her email practices. Clinton’s answers, under oath, are due on September 29. On August 19, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan granted Judicial Watch further discovery on the Clinton email matter and ordered Clinton to answer the questions “by no later than thirty days thereafter….” Under federal court rules, Judicial Watch is limited to twenty-five questions.
“These are simple questions about her email system that we hope will finally result in straight-forward answers, under oath, from Hillary Clinton,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.
In his opinion ordering Clinton to answer written questions under oath Judge Sullivan wrote:
The Court is persuaded that Secretary Clinton’s testimony is necessary to enable her to explain on the record the purpose for the creation and operation of the clintonemail.com system for State Department business.
In its July 2016 request to depose Hillary Clinton, Judicial Watch argued:
Secretary Clinton’s deposition is necessary to complete the record. Although certain information has become available through investigations by the Benghazi Select Committee, the FBI, and the State Department Inspector General, as well as through Plaintiff’s narrowly tailored discovery to date, significant gaps in the evidence remain. Only Secretary Clinton can fill these gaps, and she does not argue otherwise.
***
To [Judicial Watch’s] knowledge, Secretary Clinton has never testified under oath why she created and used the clintonemail.com system to conduct official government business. Her only public statements on the issue are unsworn.
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today announced it submitted questions to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton concerning her email practices. Clinton’s answers, under oath, are due on September 29. On August 19, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan granted Judicial Watch further discovery on the Clinton email matter and ordered Clinton to answer the questions “by no later than thirty days thereafter….” Under federal court rules, Judicial Watch is limited to twenty-five questions.
“These are simple questions about her email system that we hope will finally result in straight-forward answers, under oath, from Hillary Clinton,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.
In his opinion ordering Clinton to answer written questions under oath Judge Sullivan wrote:
The Court is persuaded that Secretary Clinton’s testimony is necessary to enable her to explain on the record the purpose for the creation and operation of the clintonemail.com system for State Department business.
In its July 2016 request to depose Hillary Clinton, Judicial Watch argued:
Secretary Clinton’s deposition is necessary to complete the record. Although certain information has become available through investigations by the Benghazi Select Committee, the FBI, and the State Department Inspector General, as well as through Plaintiff’s narrowly tailored discovery to date, significant gaps in the evidence remain. Only Secretary Clinton can fill these gaps, and she does not argue otherwise.
***
To [Judicial Watch’s] knowledge, Secretary Clinton has never testified under oath why she created and used the clintonemail.com system to conduct official government business. Her only public statements on the issue are unsworn.
What are you hoping to hear from this??
All you will see is a bunch of "i dont remembers" "i cant recalls"...
Then what?
Waste of money, but heck, its republican think tank money that people like you donate to that they are spending.. so go ahead, waste away!
Court hearings to nowhere.
TOS.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
Seems we have two candidates who aren't mentally competent for the job.
NO, its what all CLIENTS are told to say by their lawyers in every court case in this country.
All of a sudden you have a problem with the practice.
TOS.
So all CLIENTS of lawyers are guilty?
Amazing how YOU and the other victims of suggestion are so worried about the truth and lying, yet, gave all the GW BUSH officials a free pass when they LIED to the nation....
Where was your outrage then?
Hypocrite.
TOS.
Alberto Gonzales...
"I dont remember"....
"I Don't Recall Remembering" - The Alberto Gonzales Memoir
"I dont remember"....
"I Don't Recall Remembering" - The Alberto Gonzales Memoir
Babagounj
Strength through joy
And what source gave you this insight about every court case in this country ?
Babagounj
Strength through joy
You are probably not aware that this is a multi-part lawsuit against Hillary and her staff .
Most of the staff have already given their sworn testimony.
This time Hillary can only have 1 lawyer present which will be unlike what happened with the FBI, where she brought in a co-defendant as one of her many lawyers.
Babagounj
Strength through joy
I really enjoyed Hillary's two coughing fits yesterday, but since no major news stations covered them, you'll probably just call me a liar.
‘Epic’: Hillary suffers 2 violent coughing fits
‘Epic’: Hillary suffers 2 violent coughing fits
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
Ricola is Mexican right?
Build the wall.
Build the wall.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
Meanwhile, back in reality.... We have never vetted all incoming immigrants in the entire history of this country.
newfie
Well-Known Member
lawyers also tell their people to tell the truth something Hillary missed
moreluck
golden ticket member
They take a history test!!
Similar threads
