Hoffa hall

Catatonic

Nine Lives
In February 2016, the three-member Independent Review Board (IRB) charged Aloise, the most powerful Teamster official on the West Coast, with racketeering, taking gifts from employers, and negotiating a sham collective-bargaining agreement. One of the charges against Aloise includes accepting tickets (worth $9,600, to the Playboy Super Bowl party) from an employer who was negotiating with a Teamster local. It was noted by the IRB that Aloise’s official salaries and allowances in 2014 amounted to an eye-popping $346,722.
Aloise is one of James P. Hoffa’s close allies — Hoffa has been president of the Teamsters since 1998. He was selected that year in a special election after it was revealed that the 1996 balloting had been tainted by incumbent Ron Carey’s elaborate scheme to funnel $700,000 in outside money to his campaign.

Read more at: Teamsters Still Mired in Corruption
 

wide load

Starting wage is a waste of time.
What did they talk about on their conference call today?
I was told that Fred was nasty to Hoffa supporters on the call. In a way saying he was coming after us, he knows who we are. MFr I don't care. He knows who I am.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

5habits100

Well-Known Member
I was told that Fred was nasty to Hoffa supporters on the call. In a way saying he was coming after us, he knows who we are. MFr I don't care. He knows who I am.
He promised 10,000 of the 15,000 members in his local would vote for him. He fell 7,500 short of his goal. He should be looking at the officers and agents in his local for not supporting him.
 

Gimme Danger

Well-Known Member
He promised 10,000 of the 15,000 members in his local would vote for him. He fell 7,500 short of his goal. He should be looking at the officers and agents in his local for not supporting him.
4000 voted out of 15000. Sounds like a big difference, but look at the overall percentage of the election turnout. L89 had a good percentage turnout and they voted 3400-400 for Z. I'd say that is plenty of support.
Other big locals didn't come close to touching that.
The fact that over 48 percent voted against a 17 year incumbency speaks volumes. Particularly with 6 VPs winning and incumbent VPs losing the vote battle in their own locals.
Don't act like you have this massive mandate from the members. It was a close election, showing real issues.
We as a membership need to move our union forward and those in leadership need to lead, rather then push us backwards.
 
Top