floridays
Well-Known Member
You won't believe this, but I do agree with part of this statement.alot of ppl work full time and wont have anything or little for retirement through no fault of their own.
You won't believe this, but I do agree with part of this statement.alot of ppl work full time and wont have anything or little for retirement through no fault of their own.
Didn't listen to this, in reality I agree. Unions on the other hand have been granted person hood long ago. I don't like either.
You been peeping in my windows Willis?If they somehow manage to stay in beer, ice cream, cigarettes, cable tv, tatoos and whatnot then they have no one to blame but themselves.
I see a lot of obese people on the taxpayer dime, even on section 8. If we are truthful we can talk. If not, ok.alot of people have problems just feeding themselves and paying the rent.
yea america is off the charts on obesity i dont know why. real fruits and veggies are expensive relative to junk food, and they are also much lower calorie density.I see a lot of obese people on the taxpayer dime, even on section 8. If we are truthful we can talk. If not, ok.
yea im not sure about the unions partDidn't listen to this, in reality I agree. Unions on the other hand have been granted person hood long ago. I don't like either.
Over your head, not talking nutrition.yea america is off the charts on obesity i dont know why. real fruits and veggies are expensive relative to junk food, and they are also much lower calorie density.
yea but your saying ppl are fat and supposedly poor, and that sounds reasonable to me if they are eating fatty foods to save money.Over your head, not talking nutrition.
I didn't say that.yea but your saying ppl are fat and supposedly poor, and that sounds reasonable to me if they are eating fatty foods to save money.
Finally!!! Something you and I can agree on. Lol.prices are not decided by supply and demand. prices are set by the capitalists charging as much as they think they can:
The Progressive Economics Forum » Time to Nationalize Ticketmaster
What I do object to is, first a $1.50 venue fee added onto the $38.50, a figure that really should be part of the ticket price to begin with. Next comes a Ticketmaster service charge of $7 – seven dollars!! – which means Ticketmaster is making almost five times as much as the host venue. To add insult to injury, I was looking for five tickets, so that is $35 to Ticketmaster. I was purchasing on-line, so Ticketmaster’s marginal cost of selling me the tickets was close to zero (the cost of electricity to move a few electrons around plus some small amortized amount related to the purchase of hardware and development of ticket-selling software). And on-line this marginal cost is the same no matter how many tickets I bought.
In the face of such monopoly pricing, my rational utility-maximizer goes out the window to be replaced with an irrational ball of rage willing to go out of my way to deny Ticketmaster its greedy cut. But I am not sure if I can get tickets from the venue itself, so I may well not go at all. Ticketmaster is a horrible monopoly; others, including some rich bands like Pearl Jam, have tried to create an alternative ticket vendor, but failed. Because Ticketmaster is so entrenched (a lock-in effect), we need to find remedies to ensure fairer (and arguably, more efficient) outcomes.
we agree on alot. i dont go for the divide and conquer.Finally!!! Something you and I can agree on. Lol.
Umm. No. We agree on very little.we agree on alot. i dont go for the divide and conquer.
agree to disagreeUmm. No. We agree on very little.