If Trump lost the 2020 election and knew he lost the 2020 election fairly do you believe he would concede to Biden?

wilberforce15

Well-Known Member
They don't have a choice to certify. They were trying to disenfranchise voters in black communities that vote majority democratic. Ttku...
Choosing whether to certify is literally the entire job description.

Illegal votes with illegal counting methods don't get certified.

Even if minorities do it and whine about enforcement against minorities.

We don't care. You break the law - your votes don't get certified.
 

MAKAVELI

Well-Known Member
Choosing whether to certify is literally the entire job description.

Illegal votes with illegal counting methods don't get certified.

Even if minorities do it and whine about enforcement against minorities.

We don't care. You break the law - your votes don't get certified.
Choosing which votes are " illegal " is not their job description. Their no vote means nothing anyway as the 2-2 deadlock would simply move it to the state board. This just in! Drumpf still lost!
 

Ou812fu

Polishing toilet bowls since 1966.
Choosing which votes are " illegal " is not their job description. Their no vote means nothing anyway as the 2-2 deadlock would simply move it to the state board. This just in! Drumpf still lost!
Here is data that you can't ignore.
 

Attachments

  • 20201119_095252.jpg
    20201119_095252.jpg
    88.4 KB · Views: 106

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
Here is data that you can't ignore.
Anybody have a link to this? Have a NYT subscription and would be interested in seeing the article or post if it's out there. Anyone can say anything is from anywhere these days and context is also important.
 

wilberforce15

Well-Known Member
Choosing which votes are " illegal " is not their job description. Their no vote means nothing anyway as the 2-2 deadlock would simply move it to the state board. This just in! Drumpf still lost!
It actually is.

Certifying a vote only makes sense if not certifying it is an option.

The law was repeatedly broken. Therefore, don't certify. Simple.
 

fishtm2001

Well-Known Member
"I have said in private for some time that I believe Trump, if he is to actually leave office, may have to be impeached in the lame duck period. It's often been met with eye-rolls, but there are a number of reasons to believe he simply will not leave willingly, even if it's useful and necessary to call on him to resign. The first is that he may well face criminal jeopardy in multiple jurisdictions once he loses the immunity protections of the presidency. This guy has been crooked for a long time, and while a staggering number of the people around him have faced prison time, he has yet to see any real consequences. He does not intend to. He also owes a lot of people a lot of money, and it's not clear he could make good even if he wanted to. (He does not.) Beyond the practical, there is the specter of his towering ego and his crippling fear of humiliation. His impulsive and shameless behavior, often bordering on nihilism, is driven in no small part by a primal urge to avoid paying the piper. It's worked for him his whole life. This guy never pays his bills—to contractors or to the bank—and nothing ever comes of it. Why should that stop now?"

Jack Holmes
 

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
"I have said in private for some time that I believe Trump, if he is to actually leave office, may have to be impeached in the lame duck period. It's often been met with eye-rolls, but there are a number of reasons to believe he simply will not leave willingly, even if it's useful and necessary to call on him to resign
Trump definitely lost. But Republicans in Congress aren't going to vote to impeach a guy who just received nearly 74,000,000 votes from their constituents.
 

Re-Raise

Well-Known Member
“I think about the classic male hero in American culture when you and I were growing up: the John Waynes, the Gary Coopers, the Jimmy Stewarts, the Clint Eastwoods, for that matter. There was a code … the code of masculinity that I grew up with that harkens back to the ’30s and ’40s and before that. There’s a notion that a man is true to his word, that he takes responsibility, that he doesn’t complain, that he isn’t a bully—in fact he defends the vulnerable against bullies. And so even if you are someone who is annoyed by wokeness and political correctness and wants men to be men again and is tired about everyone complaining about the patriarchy, I thought that the model wouldn’t be Richie Rich—the complaining, lying, doesn’t-take-responsibility-for-anything type of figure.”

Obama
Amen! And all of the grown men baby MAGA clowns are too stupid to ever understand this!
 

Ou812fu

Polishing toilet bowls since 1966.
Here is another one with the same set of sequences happening. Completely different state.
 

Attachments

  • 20201119_204812.jpg
    20201119_204812.jpg
    201.4 KB · Views: 103

newfie

Well-Known Member
Here is another one with the same set of sequences happening. Completely different state.
Someone screwed up. they were supposed to feed them in gradually . The dems had to rush because the republicans were watching them so closely and got carried away leaving huge flares everywhere
 
Top