MrFedEx
Engorged Member
Trump didn't legally have to do it at all.
Emoluments Clause. He absolutely does have to do it.
Trump didn't legally have to do it at all.
No he doesn't.Emoluments Clause. He absolutely does have to do it.
Even if he's not legally compelled don't you believe he should? At this point it's obvious he's hiding something, aren't you curious what that is?No he doesn't.
No he doesn't.
No he doesn't.
So W appointed a liberal activist judge? Seems out of character for him.
That's where the lawsuit was heard. Last night on appeal a THREE judge panel upheld his decision and the appeal moves on to the full 9th circuit.
That's how the appellate system works. If the 3 judge panel disagreed they would have ruled in Trumps favor and the ban would be back in place. They upheld the judge's decision and it moves on to the full court.didn't uphold want to hear the full case on monday
That's how the appellate system works. If the 3 judge panel disagreed they would have ruled in Trumps favor and the ban would be back in place. They upheld the judge's decision and it moves on to the full court.
Using that standard neither was his daddy, or Reagan for that matter. Come to think of it the Republican party hasn't had a conservative president for... well, modern history. So the real question is, who's definition of "conservative" is wrong? Yours, or the Republican Party's? Maybe what you want to believe conservative means is actually something totally different.GW was not the conservative you libs like to make him out to be
GW was not the conservative you libs like to make him out to be
Right. So now that one of his appointees makes a decision you don't like, you throw Dubya under the bus for not being a conservative. Dumb.
At least he picked a smart judge.
Name a republican president who didn't.you guys forget he spent money like a liberal. lord knows you liked to remind us of it here.
Ah yes the original champion of Republican ideals like states rights and small government..... wait a second.....Lincoln
That's how the appellate system works. If the 3 judge panel disagreed they would have ruled in Trumps favor and the ban would be back in place. They upheld the judge's decision and it moves on to the full court.
Follow up ...Just heard on the local police dept radio .
I concern citizen reported that they were behind a Honda that was unable to stay within marked lanes . When the police stopped the Honda all the driver had to show for a driver's license was an id from Guatemala . The operator will be charged with a Chapter 90-10 ,with more charges to follow , which is a criminal charge for unlicensed operation of a Motor Vehicle .
The Honda is being towed and the towing company is being told not to release the vehicle without their ok .
Isn't America a great place .
Who do you think heard the government's argument to lift the stay and put the ban back in place? A 3 judge panel of the 9th circuit. They didn't go ask the original judge to change his mind.actually all of that is decided today. don't create your own argument outside of the facts.
Who do you think heard the government's argument to lift the stay and put the ban back in place? A 3 judge panel of the 9th circuit. They didn't go ask the original judge to change his mind.