UnionStrong
Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
Settle down, Lol. Can’t stop laughing!actually it is
Settle down, Lol. Can’t stop laughing!actually it is
ok Operational needsSettle down, Lol. Can’t stop laughing!
It's Libya. We invaded? When? Serbia? We invaded? When? I'll give you Iraq.recently serbia, iraq, lybia
I was thinking that's a female body part but I may be wrong.Never heard of Lybia.
NATO bombed Serbia, but did not invade.It's Libya. We invaded? When? Serbia? We invaded? When? I'll give you Iraq.
nato bombed libya in 2011 god knows what elseIt's Libya. We invaded? When? Serbia? We invaded? When? I'll give you Iraq.
No, no, you said we invaded. That's boots on the ground.nato bombed libya in 2011 god knows what else
Libya - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
wiki not to be mistaken for almighty chris hedges or noam chomsky
NATO stopped a genocide in Kosovo by bombing Serbia. @rickyb conveniently leaves that part out.NATO bombed Serbia, but did not invade.
are you sureNo, no, you said we invaded. That's boots on the ground.
?No, no, you said we invaded. That's boots on the ground.
As if I wasn't aware. Gaddafi was sponsoring terrorist acts and got bombed for it. Serbia was slaughtering civilians and got bombed for it. You mess with the bull you get the horns.are you sure
?
and even if you didnt invade, you bombed LOL
so what are you defending? you should be happy i told you about this.
did libya attack NATO lol?As if I wasn't aware. Gaddafi was sponsoring terrorist acts and got bombed for it. Serbia was slaughtering civilians and got bombed for it. You mess with the bull you get the horns.
Sponsored the killing of civilians with the Lockerbie airplane bomb amongst others. The UK is part of NATO and many of the passengers were Americans. Why do you defend terrorism?did libya attack NATO lol?
nato killed libyan civilians btwSponsored the killing of civilians with the Lockerbie airplane bomb amongst others. The UK is part of NATO and many of the passengers were Americans. Why do you defend terrorism?
Well Chomsky is wrong. Those civilians wouldn't have died if Gaddafi hadn't acted recklessly. After the bombing he backed off and became very cooperative. Sometimes you have to throw down to stop the madness. Or is it your position that it's ok to attack NATO countries but isn't ok for NATO to retaliate?nato killed libyan civilians btw
chomsky cites the nato bombing of libya as a recent example of its aggressive non defensive nature
according to jedi master chomsky, nato is the most violent aggressive alliance in teh worldWell Chomsky is wrong. Those civilians wouldn't have died if Gaddafi hadn't acted recklessly. After the bombing he backed off and became very cooperative. Sometimes you have to throw down to stop the madness. Or is it your position that it's ok to attack NATO countries but isn't ok for NATO to retaliate?
By the way with an alliance of almost a billion people you'd think NATO would be a lot more aggressive than the examples you cited. Why it's almost like NATO exists to deter authoritarian types who want to take from others.
Choke on it, liberals!Fareed is a CNN left winger. Watch or listen to his show every week.
Opinion: Democrats need to admit that they’re wrong on immigration
By Fareed Zakaria
“The Democrats are confronting a crisis that could cripple their chances at the polls at the national, state and local level. I’m talking about immigration. It’s happening not only because Republicans are taking advantage of the problem but also because Democrats are unwilling to accept that their policy ideas on the issue are wrong and grossly inadequate to the challenge at hand.
Apprehensions at the southern border are surging again. Texas border towns have long been inundated by the waves of arrivals, but now that migrants are being bused into cities such as New York, Chicago and D.C., local governments there are facing backbreaking expenses to house them. New York Mayor Eric Adams (D) was exaggerating only slightly when he said the problem would “destroy” the city.“