India 🇮🇳 vs Pakistan 🇵🇰 Can Trump stop it or make it worse ?

Next Day Err

Well-Known Member
And as usual, you twist what that agreement said. We actually strong. armed them and they fell for it.. We gave no assurances. They aren’t even smart enough to be their own country clearly and we never promised to do anything for them.
Because we didn’t
"Memorandum on Security Assurances in connection with Ukraine's accession to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons” is the full title of the document we signed along with the UK and Russia. Well, Russia backed out. Do we want to be as disgusting as Russia? I guess we have our guy for that, huh.

I’m done with you, pal.
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
No better at it than those on the other side.

Don't pretend you logged in today looking to find compromise and learn from those on the other side of the aisle.
No, he looked at calling people names. Called me, Maga and I’m pretty sure I’m not. I don’t hate Donald Trump, but I don’t think he’s god either.

Tried to point out to him and many like him that their attitudes caused Donald Trump to rise to power. They assume I’m attacking them .
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
"Memorandum on Security Assurances in connection with Ukraine's accession to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons” is the full title of the document we signed along with the UK and Russia. Well, Russia backed out. Do we want to be as disgusting as Russia? I guess we have our guy for that, huh.

I’m done with you, pal.
Hey pal, I’m well aware of what it’s called and then it goes on to explain. We are not required to do anything. Maybe if you had actually read the whole thing you would know that. That’s one hilariously bad agreement.

The very fact that Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Ukraine agreed to sign the Budapest Memorandum without any specific mechanisms to ensure their security speaks volumes about the international environment of the 1990s and how it was perceived by the signatory states.


I’m done with you

 

BadIdeaGuy

Moderator
Staff member
MAGA doesn’t engage in nuance and facts as a rule. Sorry.
I'm not sure why you're so upset, but you're doing pretty much the same thing you say others get away with that you can't.
You're calling names, and making personal attacks. Just saying.


You realize that those on the other side would say the exact same about the "rabid left wingers" or whatever term of endearment they're using these days? There is no difference.
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
"Memorandum on Security Assurances in connection with Ukraine's accession to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons” is the full title of the document we signed along with the UK and Russia. Well, Russia backed out. Do we want to be as disgusting as Russia? I guess we have our guy for that, huh.

I’m done with you, pal.
I’ll leave you a quote by one of the Sages of our time about worthless guarantees

Tommy Boy

“Because they know all they sold ya was a guaranteed piece of :censored2:. That's all it is, isn't it? Hey, if you want me to take a dump in a box and mark it guaranteed, I will. I got spare time.”
 

Next Day Err

Well-Known Member
I’ll leave you a quote by one of the Sages of our time about worthless guarantees
I never said it wasn't a worthless guarantee. You said we didn't give our assurance (our word) that we would act in Ukraine's interest in exchange for giving up their nukes. I said we DID, in fact, do that very thing. You got called out for it and then you changed the subject about how the assurances were a bad idea. That was not my argument. You changed the subject because you were WRONG.

Bye.
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
I never said it wasn't a worthless guarantee. You said we didn't give our assurance (our word) that we would act in Ukraine's interest in exchange for giving up their nukes. I said we DID, in fact, do that very thing. You got called out for it and then you changed the subject about how the assurances were a bad idea. That was not my argument. You changed the subject because you were WRONG.

Bye.
But you don’t have an argument we didn’t give assurances at all. I didn’t change any argument. It’s the same argument I’ve always had. We never promised to do anything for Ukraine in the Budapest memorandum.
They simply signed it because they thought they had no choice.
At least Indians got trinkets and beads
Stop shooting from the hip

Please tell me what action we promised we would do other than giving our assurance that they had sovereignty. Which does absolutely nothing.

They actually don’t have sovereignty because they can’t even take care of themselves.


When I was 18, I told my dad I was an adult. And he acknowledged my adulthood and sovereignty.

Then I asked him if I could borrow some money and he told me to go pound sand and get a job.
 
Last edited:

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Why are you stuck in lib land? Crazy. That is general info. Wake up seriously. If you have a “guy” don’t go 💯 for them because they are not 💯 for you. Lord…
“President Trump has shared an AI-generated video depicting his resort-like vision for the future of Gaza — featuring a gigantic golden statue of the president as well as images of him lounging topless poolside with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.”
And he has also posted himself as the Pope, and tweaked Canada about being the 51st State. He likes to troll libs. You act exasperated that I don't believe that's his intent in Gaza. I find it totally exasperating that you believe it's true. I wish for Pete's sake Trump would stop the trolling but after 8+ years of nonstop trying to derail him he's having the time of his life poking the eyes of gullible libs.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Well, I’m pretty sure Russia has held back quite a bit, but that’s beside the point. Ukraine is not. capable of securing their own borders without money and weapons for others. If they in fact, had some sort of usefulness to us, it would make sense for us to do that, but since they do not, I do not believe we should be giving them anything. Somehow, now they have become our dependent. With no benefit to us.

This is just reality. It’s nothing personal. It’s not a responsibility we should be and it’s clear by the way Zielinski has been acting. He feels entitled.
Russia has held back? The Russians went to North Korea for troops and ammo. The two sides have been pretty much at a stalemate on the ground for some time now.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
No, I think it’s pretty evident. He was correct about this. If Russia decides they want to take over Ukraine, nobody will stop them without an all out world war. Completely unnecessary and no reason to do that. Sorry you don’t understand that. The truth is the rest of the world understands that as well even if they’re uncomfortable admitting it which is why they have not been allowed to join NATO.
What world war? Who is going to back Russia? The only thing that keeps NATO troops out is Russian nukes.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Well, I’m pretty sure Russia has held back quite a bit, but that’s beside the point. Ukraine is not. capable of securing their own borders without money and weapons for others. If they in fact, had some sort of usefulness to us, it would make sense for us to do that, but since they do not, I do not believe we should be giving them anything. Somehow, now they have become our dependent. With no benefit to us.

This is just reality. It’s nothing personal. It’s not a responsibility we should be and it’s clear by the way Zielinski has been acting. He feels entitled.
Dude, it's Zelenskyy, or one y Zelensky.
 
Top