Donald Rumsfeld recently gave an interview with The Times of London (article behind paywall but covered here, here, here among others) in which it's reported he questioned the invasion of Iraq as it pertains to creating a democracy.
It seems now Rumsfeld is "advising and extending" his remarks per this piece in The Guardian.
And another view to consider can be found in Meet The Generals Who Spoke Out Against Rumfeld which from that perspective can be enlightening. Here are The Seven who dare to speak. In a few respects, it seems to echo the voice of Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, Colin Powell's Chief of Staff not just when he was Sec. of State but also when Powell was head of the Joint Chiefs.
As almost in wrestling caricature, we are presented with a new "Heel" for us to hate on and be very afraid of. Next is for the program MC aka Gordon Solie or Lance Russell, to bring out the heroic "Babyface" in order to remind us all is well and everything is under control so we can get back to keeping up with the more important things like what Caitlyn Jenner had for breakfast today.
Imparting some wisdom from Col. Wilkerson, did Blackwater in effect enable both sides of the conflict and then how does that on the general ledger bottom line benefit Blackwater among others? And yes, I know Blackwater no longer exists under that name.
ISIS Colonel Was Trained by Blackwater and U.S. State Department for 11 Years
That crushes the point that ISIS exists because Bush didn't give them jobs.
War isn't a game. That's the only correct thing that I've seen you post on this site. Congratulations.
Humor aside, are you accusing me of making that argument or is this to the broader discussion?
it isnt YOUR game bro. Hopefully that clarifies it. You know nothing about policy or decision making. You dont invest that far into military operations. You are a follower, a believer of fantasy when it comes to war.
You went "ALL IN" on Shock and Awe, only to be left with egg on your face 8 years later with 10,000 US military personnel dead and 2500 contractors killed, and an economy destroyed.
Today, you sing the same tune, because the idiots who led you down the road to two wars, want to lead you down that road again.
Hopefully, they do.
TOS.
You went "ALL IN" on Shock and Awe, only to be left with egg on your face 8 years later with 10,000 US military personnel dead and 2500 contractors killed, and an economy destroyed.
TOS.
Still just making things up as you go I see.
All you got to do is review all your posts. Pretty clear to see.
Speaking of terrorists being created by the USA... maybe you should try reading this little gem of a report..
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012...and-saudi-backing-of-al-qaeda-led-to-911.html
Maybe you will rethink your concept that both wars were legitimate and no terrorists were created out of them. I doubt you have the comprehension for it though.
TOS.
Why not take some time from flame throwing, and examine the record in Iraq, the whos who of players, the whys and why nots...
Maybe it will help you take off the blinders that BUSH and his cronies started two wars because they wanted to protect America?
https://www.thesleuthjournal.com/is...error-blackwater-commander-is-coming-for-you/
TOS.
There you go arguing with yourself over again. You claimed Bush created ISIS because he didn't give them jobs. Now you claim he created ISIS as their job. Bawhahahahhah
You are one comical dude.
What isnt surprising is your lack of knowledge on the subjects of war, consequences and occurences.
keep blabbering , if that makes you feel better.
TOS.
You're endless embarrassment.Typical radical leftist response when when you cannot make your point.
You're endless entertainment.
You are not well educated, are you?There you go arguing with yourself over again. You claimed Bush created ISIS because he didn't give them jobs. Now you claim he created ISIS as their job. Bawhahahahhah
You are one comical dude.
You're endless embarrassment.
You are not well educated, are you?