realbrown1
Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
There was no ISIS before a Democrat became president either.There would be no ISIS in Iraq had we left Saddam alone.
Where are you going with this?
There was no ISIS before a Democrat became president either.There would be no ISIS in Iraq had we left Saddam alone.
You should rethink that when you are so dedicate to hate something.What are you babbling about?
No where in my post did I mention Iraq, or going into Iraq.
Is there a point you are trying to make, or are you just being an arse?You should rethink that when you are so dedicated to hate something.
Is there a point you are trying to make, or are you just being an arse?
There was no ISIS before a Democrat became president either.
Where are you going with this?
You are a legend in your own mind.
How do you deal with it?
There would be no ISIS in Iraq had we left Saddam alone.
So who were we fighting before ISIS? Honestly, what's in a name?There wouldn't have been an ISIS in Iraq if Obama and Clinton hadn't waged war to topple the government in Libya either.
It is just a guess but it seems much more likely that since there wasn't ISIS in Iraq when Saddam was gone but there was an ISIS in Iraq after Obama/Clinton toppled they Libyan government that would be the cause.
So who were we fighting before ISIS? Honestly, what's in a name?
It's the Bushes' fault but it's not like it matters at this point. Now, the truth is that if we left the region, they would end of fighting themselves. ISIS is only held together by their common goal to kill the foreigners occupying their land.
Americans dying for nothing. Not to mention the thing that really matters most, the money.I disagree but what's the point?
ISIS is made up of and led by many the Iraqi military personnel that GW's Coalition Provisional Authority, Paul Bremer, fired. They had extensive combat experience and training and are now using those skills to dismantle Syria and Iraq. These guys left their good paying jobs carrying their weapons and no employment opportunities. Surprise!!! They're pissed and fighting back...There wouldn't have been an ISIS in Iraq if Obama and Clinton hadn't waged war to topple the government in Libya either.
It is just a guess but it seems much more likely that since there wasn't ISIS in Iraq when Saddam was gone but there was an ISIS in Iraq after Obama/Clinton toppled they Libyan government that would be the cause.
ISIS is made up of and led by many the Iraqi military personnel that GW's Coalition Provisional Authority, Paul Bremer, fired.
Some people need to be reminded because they didn't learn anything from the huge friend up the first time around.Always looking back and saying why.....how about looking forward and telling how?
Hindsight's 20/20....everybody knows that.
Gee - and here I thought the withdrawal from Iraq was started by Bush due to the fact that the SOFA agreement was not going to be renewed...Iraq was a socialist country so everyone essentially worked for the government in some capacity.
Very desperate on your part to try and blame Bush.
Always looking back and saying why.....how about looking forward and telling how?
Hindsight's 20/20....everybody knows that.
Gee - and here I thought the withdrawal from Iraq was started by Bush due to the fact that the SOFA agreement was not going to be renewed...
The lives wasted in Iraq were due to a completely unnecessary war that was started by lying to Congress by rewriting critical parts of the National Intelligence Estimate, then prosecuting a war that ignored almost all the advice of the generals and senior officers. A war, incidentally, that created a terrorist group - al Quada In Iraq that hadn't previously existed before the invasion, and one that spawned ISIL. Bush let 911 happen
Bush let OBL escape
Bush used 911 to go into Iraq
Bush caused the resulting deaths of nearly 5,000 Americans due to that war
Bush stuck the taxpayer with a 6 trillion dollar war bill from that war
Bush allowed ISIL into Iraq because of that war....Digest that av