J6 Hearing
- Thread starter Jiangshi
- Start date
I don’t know. Have they said they won’t allow it? I admit I haven’t really been keeping up with this. Kinda boring. Seems only people with TDS on both sides care (although everyone probably should).
But to me it seems like a trap set for the agents. Like they have their testimony that doesn’t add up and they want them back under oath and need a way to get them there. No better way than to have the agents sprinting up to the stand with his hand already in the air.
oldngray
nowhere special
They absolutely do not want those agents to be allowed to testify and contradict their lies.
Have they ruled it out?
oldngray
nowhere special
Have they said they would allow it? The ball is in their court.
Agreed. And if and when they do allow it, they will completely control the narrative. They will ask questions and the agents will answer.
At that time the original testimony will be contrasted with the new testimony to further accentuate the version of events that the committee is putting forth.
Trump’s right. McCarthy did him no favors when he boycotted a hearing that he couldn’t stop from happening. And at the beginning, Fox News tried to ignore it but the story hasn’t gone away.
oldngray
nowhere special
Not what happened.
It is. Pelosi shot down a couple of McCarthys choices because they would likely be called to testify. McCarthy then withdrew and refused to put any other republicans on the committee hoping it would destroy any credibility the committee has.
Maybe it worked, maybe it didn’t.
oldngray
nowhere special
Pelosi rejected McCarthy's choices because they might ask inconvenient questions. Them being potential witnesses was just her lame excuse. It has been nothing but a partisan show trying to produce a narrative but the evidence just isn't there. Plus the J6 members can and have lied many times but they are allowed to do so. And nobody is allowed to counter them.
Cmon now. Even Fox News doesn’t spew that line anymore.
oldngray
nowhere special
I didn't know you were a loyal Fox news watcher.
What they say or don't say now doesn't change the facts. Despite your revisionist history.
Will be interesting to see if this committee will allow anyone to refute anything they put forth about Trump.
Nope. Saw Jim Jordan say on FOX the questions he'd be asking while on the panel. Nancy Pelosi removed him and the other Republican the next day.
Turdferguson
Just a turd
REEEEEEEEEE
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
P
Everyone lies on camera and no one lies under oath? That's pretty naive.
Not when it fits his narrative. Of course hookers peed on Trump. Says so right there in the Steele dossier which has the Democratic seal of approval so you know it's gospel fact.
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
Another one of your BlueAnon conspiracy theories.
They were probably colluding with the Russians too!
Lol.
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
Not what happened.
Pelosi rejected Republicans on the committee because they wanted answers about her involvement.
Pelosi's office is the only one that is off limits to the investigation.
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
Thank you for summing up your presence in this thread so concisely. You should have started with that and saved everyone the time.
TearsInRain
IE boogeyman
46 more days liz
