It has you. Remember when TDU went to court over hiding their books and protecting the super secret illuminati that support your cause. Shouldn't you be busy strong arming, retaliating and conspiring?
Last edited by a moderator:
Ken H to debate Fred Z
- Thread starter UniteandWin
- Start date
But they are not. Pay attention. You must be a member in good standing.
Gimme Danger
Well-Known Member
If it went to court, then it went through the "legal" process and the result can't be "illegal." You answered the question, and contradicted yourself. And you want to be a BA?
I saw your pics of you with your friend who loves punishment of the opposition. Pathetic.
It was proven that the "opposition" showed retaliation against a female member. And that case seems to be growing. You think anyone will roll over you?
Gimme Danger
Well-Known Member
I had a coffee roll the other day, it was delicious. It rolled around my stomach for a few hours. That's the only thing rolling over little old me.
You guys are just angry your little gravy train ended (RIH print shop) and you don't have a chance to get back on the big gravy train (the Local), Mr. 485.
UniteandWin
Well-Known Member
Actually the consent decree started in 1989, not because of tdu, or any so called reformers. There were 3 IBT Presidents that were FBI informants( look it up) the corruption caused the government oversight headed by Rudy G, ( look that up too)
Sent using BrownCafe App
Sent using BrownCafe App
BigUnionGuy
Got the T-Shirt
Ahhhh, that theory died when the receipts were produced no weren't they. Seems as thought that theory kinda blew up in your faces. Which election protest was that again. Time and time again your only claim is that everyone else lies, coming from the biggest liar of them all. Your a failure.
ezmoney5150
Well-Known Member
If I was the GP or the GST I wouldn't debate him at all. If I had to guess Zuck is going to talk mostly about UPS anyway and I'm sure that Ken wants to wipe the floor with him. Especially when Zuck held our contract up for issues that could have been handled through the grievance procedure.
They know how far they are ahead. They know that TDU doesn't have a chance. Like I said. Ken want to pour salt on Zuck's wound.
Who know's. Maybe Mary wanted to debate Strickland and Kasich said no.
Just because you don't like the answer doesn't mean I didn't answer it.
Last edited:
ezmoney5150
Well-Known Member
Oh Snap. Zuck just got caught in a lie.
ezmoney5150
Well-Known Member
Fred pull the Central States card. Saying Hoffa took UPS out of the fund. Hall said: you were on negotiating committe and when you were there you didn't speak up and you recommended the contract to your members.
Cspan
ezmoney5150
Well-Known Member
Zuckerman just had his words used against him. He commented about new plan (supposedly) to fix the fund with different kinds of investments from corporations. Hall said a minute ago you just said that the IBT doesn't communicate with you and you're in the dog house. If thats the case how do you know that?
UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)
Well-Known Member
No matter how he feels about the man, Fred should refer to H as Mr. H out of respect for what he has done and how long he has served the Union.
ezmoney5150
Well-Known Member
Zuck kept saying how UPS healthcare was so bad. KH asked him whats wrong with it and Zuck never responds. Hmmmmmmmm.
ezmoney5150
Well-Known Member
I wish I had that TDU flyer with Zuck on the milk carton. That's priceless. Because he was missing from all the negotiations with UPS in 2007.
ezmoney5150
Well-Known Member
I love it. Ken said they don't call you "flip flop Freddy" for nothing.
