LGBTQ

[El Correcto]

I love how you're playing in the background while me and @zubenelgenubi are back and forthing about your religious views.

The Jews of back then were wicked homophobes who called for the death of all gays.
They sent jesus to spread homophobia into the gentiles and Jewish disinformation about reality has plagued man ever since. Muslims, Christians, all bow to Jewish disinformation about human beings and our universe, Muslims less so but are worse in some ways.

 

[zubenelgenubi]

I'm not into that liberal sounding mumbo jumbo. Judging my posts based solely on their content would be fine with me.

Liberal? Lol. You just misjudged my post. How dare you?

 

[Box Ox]

Liberal? Lol. You just misjudged my post. How dare you?

Sure. I'll demonstrate what I mean by replacing a few words from your quote.

Your original quote:

How can one judge what a post is without the proper context of who the person is who wrote it?

A liberal-sounding quote on criminals and criminality:

"How can one judge what a crime is without the proper context of who the criminal is who committed it?"

 

[bottomups]

How was the universe made? And by what? Who? At some point, something had to have come from nothing

What did your god come from?

 

[zubenelgenubi]

Sure. I'll demonstrate what I mean by replacing a few words from your quote.

Your original quote:


A liberal-sounding quote on criminals and criminality:

"How can one judge what a crime is without the proper context of who the criminal is who committed it?"

So, you're saying a post can have different meanings in different contexts? Well, in your case you have to change the words too.

If I were to judge this post for what it is, I'd have to say it's all kinds of confused.

Man, I'm having trouble untangling that mess. If you are going to call someone a criminal, and what they did a crime, you've already made your judgment. Now, if I were to say how can we know that an action is criminal until we understand the intent of the person who committed the action? That makes perfect sense, and is a reasonable question to ask.

Sometimes an action is objectively criminal, and intent is irrelevant. Sometimes it's not so easy. Say I shot someone. Is that a crime? Generally yes. But what if I was a soldier in a war and shot an enemy soldier, is that a crime? Generally no. But what if the soldier surrendered before I shot him? Then yes. Except that he surrendered so he could suicide bomb our squad, so I shot him before he could get too close.

Context is necessary to judge a thing. Often times, on the internet particularly, we judge a post without the necessary context, leading to misunderstanding.

 

[El Correcto]

What did your god come from?

Jewish disinformation.

 

[Box Ox]

Context is necessary to judge a thing. Often times, on the internet particularly, we judge a post without the necessary context, leading to misunderstanding.

We all judge things on the internet for which context is impossible to gather. And when it is impossible, such as on an anonymous forum like Brown Cafe, we have to learn and evaluate each others' viewpoints based soely upon the content of our posts.

Until I can get a camera crew and/or a reporter over to @El Correcto 's place I'm just gonna have to go by what he's posted about his views on God, heaven and religion in general.

 

[El Correcto]

We all judge things on the internet for which context is impossible to gather. And when it is impossible, such as on an anonymous forum like Brown Cafe, we have to learn and evaluate each others' viewpoints based soely upon the content of our posts.

Until I can get a camera crew and/or a reporter over to @El Correcto 's place I'm just gonna have to go by what he's posted about his views on God, heaven and religion in general.

Call a jew worshipper a jew worshipper and watch as he recoils.

 

[zubenelgenubi]

We all judge things on the internet for which context is impossible to gather. And when it is impossible, such as on an anonymous forum like Brown Cafe, we have to learn and evaluate each others' viewpoints based soely upon the content of our posts.

Until I can get a camera crew and/or a reporter over to @El Correcto 's place I'm just gonna have to go by what he's posted about his views on God, heaven and religion in general.

Which are apparently contradictory. Do you go off a weighted average to make your judgment? I personally assume he doesn't mean most of what he says about religion. He says it to get people riled. You can tell by his inflammatory word choice and how he tweaks it ever so slightly over time, probably based on previous post interactions, to optimize the pot stirring. He's calling it Jewish disinformation to resonate with the conservatives who are feelings persecuted by people using that particular word. He's doing it hoping to get people to go off the deep end defending their sacred cows.

 

[zubenelgenubi]

Call a jew worshipper a jew worshipper and watch as he recoils.

@Box Ox, see, I was right. He does it to get a reaction.

 

[El Correcto]

Keep in mind these hateful pricks laugh about gays beinbr killed by fundamentalist nutjobs and make excuses for chrisitians who call for them to be shot in the head.

But once I start joking around about them worshipping a jew and listening to Jewish disinformation about reality, we gotta ban him and shut him up, time to get him out of the lgbt thread.

Bunch of snowflakes. Don’t dish it if you can’t take it. Never hit the report button in my life, my fellow non-jew worshippers.

 

[Box Ox]

Keep in mind these hateful pricks laugh about gays beinbr killed by fundamentalist nutjobs and make excuses for chrisitians who call for them to be shot in the head.

But once I start joking around about them worshipping a jew and listening to Jewish disinformation about reality, we gotta ban him and shut him up, time to get him out of the lgbt thread.

Bunch of snowflakes. Don’t dish it if you can’t take it. Never hit the report button in my life, my fellow non-jew worshippers.

Sounds like you really might not believe in God or heaven. Do you wish to provide any context?

 

[vantexan]

Keep in mind these hateful pricks laugh about gays beinbr killed by fundamentalist nutjobs and make excuses for chrisitians who call for them to be shot in the head.

But once I start joking around about them worshipping a jew and listening to Jewish disinformation about reality, we gotta ban him and shut him up, time to get him out of the lgbt thread.

Bunch of snowflakes. Don’t dish it if you can’t take it. Never hit the report button in my life, my fellow non-jew worshippers.

I'm not Jewish nor do I support Israel because of religious beliefs. But I do find the animosity towards Jews troubling. Puts people who hate them in the same group as Hitler.

 

[El Correcto]

I can turn the party of anti-SJW anti-snowflake anti-gay into the party of wah wah racism with this one neat trick.

 

[El Correcto]

Sounds like you really might not believe in God or heaven. Do you wish to provide any context?

I’ve provided about 300 pages of context over the years, not my fault is you didn’t listen.

 

[Box Ox]

I’ve provided about 300 pages of context over the years, not my fault is you didn’t listen.

Indeed. Glad we agree that your views on God, heaven and religion still stand.

 

[zubenelgenubi]

Indeed. Glad we agree that your views on God, heaven and religion still stand.

The real question at hand @El Correcto, is why you would hope that Tony and Cheryl are together in a place you don't believe in?

BTW the suffix -el is a reference to the Jewish God. Everyone's name that ends in -el is a designation of a relationship to God. The Spanish "El" masculine designation likely has its roots in this Jewish reference to God, as in El Shaddai.

 

[Box Ox]

Speaking of growing up and being an adult, you hoping Cheryl and Tony are in heaven with god's love? Are you are liar or a hypocrite?

Post #87. Was wondering about that too.

The real question at hand @El Correcto, is why you would hope that Tony and Cheryl are together in a place you don't believe in?

I see we've come full circle here.

 

[zubenelgenubi]

I see we've come full circle here.

That was the heart of the matter, and I assume we still won't get an answer. As far as I'm concerned his reluctance to answer the question says a lot.

 

[Non liberal]

Thank you. Good luck living a life of delusion based on Jewish disinformation.
The only thing Rome did wrong was not getting to the source of this disinformation sooner before it spread to the gentiles and corrupted our bisexual paradise.

Lol, so you post of happenings from the Bible but totally ignore gods word. Exactly what the Bible means when it says we know what we do is wrong but we do it anyway. Thank you.