LGBTQ

[El Correcto]

I'll take that as you see the point but wont admit it.
Figures.

Gosh darn me for making the point that murder and gay sex are not comparable.

Honestly I expected you to name off the rules of “natural laws and design”.

You just kept writing these murder and gay sex rants like it is some earth shattering reality check to anyone who is gay.

 

[El Correcto]

It is rather amusing.
You see someone paint themselves into a corner and fighting like a cornered cat.

I like the saying, "You can't save face and your ass at the same time."

He just needs to stop posting in this thread and forget about it!

Honestly it’s impressive. You think damn that was some crazy and he just think I need to double down on this and reiterate the point they can’t grasp my ground breaking new theory of gay sex and murder.

 

[BrownFlush]

It is rather amusing.
You see someone paint themselves into a corner and fighting like a cornered cat.

I like the saying, "You can't save face and your ass at the same time."

He just needs to stop posting in this thread and forget about it!

Gosh darn me for making the point that murder and gay sex are not comparable.

Honestly I expected you to name off the rules of “natural laws and design”.

You just kept writing these murder and gay sex rants like it is some earth shattering reality check to anyone who is gay.

Honestly it’s impressive. You think damn that was some crazy and he just think I need to double down on this and reiterate the point they can’t grasp my ground breaking new theory of gay sex and murder.

It was something. No doubt about it.
When it comes to intelligence I cant hold candle to the likes of you two.
A corner? You never answered this

If the natural murderer murders ,even though it felt so right to him, it was still wrong.
If the natural thief steals, even though it felt so right to him, it was still wrong.
If the homosexual has gay sex, and it just feels so right and natural to him, that doesn't make it right.
Your argument of " its just so natural so that makes it right " doesn't hold water.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

It was something. No doubt about it.
When it comes to intelligence I cant hold candle to the likes of you two.
A corner? You never answered this

I'm really just trying to figure out your end game and basically ... WHY?

But by all means continue ... very amusing.

 

[Jones]

Honestly it’s impressive. You think damn that was some crazy and he just think I need to double down on this and reiterate the point they can’t grasp my ground breaking new theory of gay sex and murder.

It's pretty obvious at this point that he's not trying to make a coherent argument, he just really likes talking about this stuff and he's trying to keep the coversation going.

 

[BrownFlush]

It's pretty obvious at this point that he's not trying to make a coherent argument, he just really likes talking about this stuff and he's trying to keep the coversation going.

Nahhhhh .. I'm done.. Nothing about keeping the conversation going and I really could care less about talking about "this stuff".. just tried way too hard to get Wrong to address facts , not as you claim incoherent arguments ,instead of the haha BS when someone doesn't want to be honest.
The evidence or facts that prove homosexuality is 1) a choice 2)because its a choice, you can make the wrong one 3) The laws of Nature prove and teach homosexuality it is not natural. 4) The law of design prove it is wrong 4) and his argument that if its natural to you it must be alright, again , refused to address the comparison but chose to poke fun at "ground breaking gay sex and murder"
Whats obvious to me is many homosexuals have sucked themselves stupid.

 

[DriveInDriѵeOut]

The evidence or facts that prove homosexuality is 1) a choice 2)because its a choice, you can make the wrong one 3) The laws of Nature prove and teach homosexuality it is not natural. 4) The law of design prove it is wrong 4) and his argument that if its natural to you it must be alright, again , refused to address the comparison but chose to poke fun at "ground breaking gay sex and murder"

None of that is fact.
At best it's your opinion, albeit, an ignorant one.

Whats obvious to me is many homosexuals have sucked themselves stupid.

Wow, talk about projection.
Your closet must be depressing.

 

[BrownFlush]

None of that is fact.
At best it's your opinion, albeit, an ignorant one.

Wow, talk about projection.
Your closet must be depressing.

Wow.. you made some kind of stand..albeit an ignorant one.
Your whole life denial? Sad.

 

[El Correcto]

Nahhhhh .. I'm done.. Nothing about keeping the conversation going and I really could care less about talking about "this stuff".. just tried way too hard to get Wrong to address facts , not as you claim incoherent arguments ,instead of the haha BS when someone doesn't want to be honest.
The evidence or facts that prove homosexuality is 1) a choice 2)because its a choice, you can make the wrong one 3) The laws of Nature prove and teach homosexuality it is not natural. 4) The law of design prove it is wrong 4) and his argument that if its natural to you it must be alright, again , refused to address the comparison but chose to poke fun at "ground breaking gay sex and murder"
Whats obvious to me is many homosexuals have sucked themselves stupid.

My argument was never if something is human nature it is okay. I was trying to establish of pattern of gay sex through out history stretching back to the first recorded civilizations that developed this behavior free of each other’s influences to establish it as a human behavior and natural. That argument was only used against people claiming gay sex isn’t nature because of reproduction. My argument was seeking sex for pleasure is a very natural human thing and sometimes takes the form of seeking a same sex partner.

You are just a good example of what happens when Christians put the Bible down and try to argue against gays using facts and not bigotry.

 

[El Correcto]

At this point you’re setting up a giant straw man and arguing it in the most ignorant fashion someone can muster, gay sex is not comparable to murder.

 

[El Correcto]

I’ve honestly argued all your points to exhaustion and you still don’t accept it.

1.the choice is to engage in the behavior not to want to in the first place.

2.That is based in religion, not all choices are right and wrong. Because I choose to eat a chicken sandwich over a hamburger doesn’t mean one was the wrong choice.

3. Bigoted religion and human laws are only thing that has ever preached homosexuality as wrong.

4. We are “designed” to experience pleasure from sex, not just reproduction.


5. See above.

I’m done with you, if you don’t like gays it’s fine.

 

[BrownFlush]

My argument was never if something is human nature it is okay. I was trying to establish of pattern of gay sex through out history stretching back to the first recorded civilizations that developed this behavior free of each other’s influences to establish it as a human behavior and natural.

Nothing here to prove right or wrong with Homosexuality .

My argument was seeking sex for pleasure is a very natural human thing and sometimes takes the form of seeking a same sex partner.

Nothing here but a definition of homosexuality.

You are just a good example of what happens when Christians put the Bible down and try to argue against gays using facts and not bigotry.

Nothing here but an attack on the moral argument which you kept trying to inject and parallel, like you are doing now. Nothing to do with the Laws of Nature or the Law of Design. Both of which you refuse to even acknowledge much less accept.

At this point you’re setting up a giant straw man and arguing it in the most ignorant fashion someone can muster, gay sex is not comparable to murder.

No straw man. The comparison is not gay sex and murder. The comparison is the natural mindset and attitude of something that comes natural , without shame or guilt, so with that your conclusion is homosexuality must be right. Based on that , why wouldn't it be right to steal or lie if you are a natural at it. No matter the result..homo sex act or stole a loaf of bread..must be ok cause it never bothered me to do it.

 

[BrownFlush]

I’ve honestly argued all your points to exhaustion and you still don’t accept it.

1.the choice is to engage in the behavior not to want to in the first place.

2.That is based in religion, not all choices are right and wrong. Because I choose to eat a chicken sandwich over a hamburger doesn’t mean one was the wrong choice.

3. Bigoted religion and human laws are only thing that has ever preached homosexuality as wrong.

4. We are “designed” to experience pleasure from sex, not just reproduction.


5. See above.

I’m done with you, if you don’t like gays it’s fine.

1. never discussed this.
2. never denied this.
3.Never discussed this. Facts of nature and design are laws.
4. never discussed reproduction , agreed sex was to experience pleasure .

Don't like gays? You go there again? I'm not about that. Got a "cool story Bro" to tell you later when I sit down at the magic box again this evening... You have tried( as most do to make it personal ) when you read things you don't like.

 

[Indecisi0n]

Is all this gay sex talk getting anyone else worked up?

 

[Jones]

Is all this gay sex talk getting anyone else worked up?

It sure seems like someone can't get enough of it

 

[newfie]

I'm really just trying to figure out your end game and basically ... WHY?

But by all means continue ... very amusing.

I am also lost in end games here

 

[newfie]

I’ve honestly argued all your points to exhaustion and you still don’t accept it.

1.the choice is to engage in the behavior not to want to in the first place.

2.That is based in religion, not all choices are right and wrong. Because I choose to eat a chicken sandwich over a hamburger doesn’t mean one was the wrong choice.

3. Bigoted religion and human laws are only thing that has ever preached homosexuality as wrong.

4. We are “designed” to experience pleasure from sex, not just reproduction.


5. See above.

I’m done with you, if you don’t like gays it’s fine.

I think if you're going to argue the religious issue with homosexuality you also have to look at that there's sort of an evolution of sorts in the Bible. initially I think when humans didn't live too long I think there was an argument for being fruitful and multiplying and against homosexuality because the human race could probably perish if they were cities like Sodom and Gomorrah where homosexuality was the predominant choice if that's the correct word. in that analogy the survival of the species possibly was what God was teaching us through others. if you continue to read through the Bible I think you seen an evolution of thought away from from condemning homosexuality and more towards the teachings of Christ that we love and respect everyone regardless of their sins and faults

 

[El Correcto]

I think if you're going to argue the religious issue with homosexuality you also have to look at that there's sort of an evolution of sorts in the Bible. initially I think when humans didn't live too long I think there was an argument for being fruitful and multiplying and against homosexuality because the human race could probably perish if they were cities like Sodom and Gomorrah where homosexuality was the predominant choice if that's the correct word. in that analogy the survival of the species possibly was what God was teaching us through others. if you continue to read through the Bible I think you seen an evolution of thought away from from condemning homosexuality and more towards the teachings of Christ that we love and respect everyone regardless of their sins and faults

It’s stupid to pick and choose which Old Testament bigotry you are going to keep and push on society.
There’s a lot more wrong with it than just bashing gays.

 

[El Correcto]

I think if you're going to argue the religious issue with homosexuality you also have to look at that there's sort of an evolution of sorts in the Bible. initially I think when humans didn't live too long I think there was an argument for being fruitful and multiplying and against homosexuality because the human race could probably perish if they were cities like Sodom and Gomorrah where homosexuality was the predominant choice if that's the correct word. in that analogy the survival of the species possibly was what God was teaching us through others. if you continue to read through the Bible I think you seen an evolution of thought away from from condemning homosexuality and more towards the teachings of Christ that we love and respect everyone regardless of their sins and faults

Actually never mind, calling gays shameful and stuff is in the New Testament as well. Jesus sounds like a .

 

[Indecisi0n]

Actually never mind, calling gays shameful and stuff is in the New Testament as well. Jesus sounds like a .

He did have nice hair though.