LGBTQ

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
Don't overthink it.

The problem for me is that while I'm a reliable Democratic voter, if I don't buy into the whole ideological package of the far left, I don't pass the ideological purity test. And there's really no room left for me in the Party. I'm a bigot because I don't believe men can have babies, or that one can choose their gender. I stick to science. Those things are not science-based.

As Democrats run increasingly farther to the left in their reaction against Donald Trump (who is indeed a massive :censored2:stick), they're leaving more and more moderates behind. And unaffiliated voters in my state are 1/3 of the registered voting population. It certainly won't help Democrats in my state if they're routinely alienated in the lead up to the 2020 elections.
 

DriveInDriѵeOut

Inordinately Right
The problem for me is that while I'm a reliable Democratic voter, if I don't buy into the whole ideological package of the far left, I don't pass the ideological purity test. And there's really no room left for me in the Party. I'm a bigot because I don't believe men can have babies, or that one can choose their gender. I stick to science. Those things are not science-based.

As Democrats run increasingly farther to the left in their reaction against Donald Trump (who is indeed a massive :censored2:stick), they're leaving more and more moderates behind. And unaffiliated voters in my state are 1/3 of the registered voting population. It certainly won't help Democrats in my state if they're routinely alienated in the lead up to the 2020 elections.
No really, don't overthink it.

Look up the definition of gender, sex, and sexuality. They're all different things by definition, not because a liberal says so.
 

El Correcto

god is dead
The problem for me is that while I'm a reliable Democratic voter, if I don't buy into the whole ideological package of the far left, I don't pass the ideological purity test. And there's really no room left for me in the Party. I'm a bigot because I don't believe men can have babies, or that one can choose their gender. I stick to science. Those things are not science-based.

As Democrats run increasingly farther to the left in their reaction against Donald Trump (who is indeed a massive :censored2:stick), they're leaving more and more moderates behind. And unaffiliated voters in my state are 1/3 of the registered voting population. It certainly won't help Democrats in my state if they're routinely alienated in the lead up to the 2020 elections.
Democrats have never been a moderate party.
Name one time they haven’t gone full simple jack on America and our system.
 

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
Democrats have never been a moderate party.
Name one time they haven’t gone full simple jack on America and our system.

Conservative Democrat - Wikipedia

"Conservative Democrats as described by others[edit]
Public officials[edit]
Presidents[edit]
Vice Presidents[edit]
Senators[edit]
House of Representatives[edit]
Governors[edit]
Current public officials[edit]
Governors[edit]
U.S. Senators[edit]
U.S. House of Representatives[edit]
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
No really, don't overthink it.

Look up the definition of gender, sex, and sexuality. They're all different things by definition, not because a liberal says so.
Who made up the definitions? At the end of the day it still takes a woman to birth a baby. A woman can claim to be a man all she wants to but that "man" will never have a baby without female reproductive organs.
 

BrownFlush

Woke Racist Reigning Ban King
If being 100% fine with gays, lesbians and gay marriage - but not with the idea that gender is “assigned” at birth and men can have babies makes me a bigot, then so be it.
See left logic and thinking?
You drew the line passed where I do. But, with the left there are no lines. That's the point.

I'm 100%"fine"with gays, lesbians,and gay marriage. I'm even "fine" with men having babies and a person getting up and deciding to identify with whatever public restroom they want to use.

But if not agreeing with and approving of any and all of it makes me a bigot, then so be it.
 

El Correcto

god is dead
Lol, Doug Jones, Carter(don’t blame that on conservatives), Woodrow Wilson...

Cmon, these people I know off the top of my head are not conservatives.

Andrew Jackson was more of a populist, similar to Trump’s campaign. He was the equivalent of spitting at the Washington bourgeoise who were crushing the southern economy. He is probably the most conservative and best politician on that list.

Look at JFK’s Vice President if you want to see one of the most destructive regressives to take the oval since FDR.

That’s just off the top of my head looking at the list.
 

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
That’s an oxymoron.

Only because they're largely no longer electable within the Democratic party. But they have still existed historically. I'd call myself a Blue Dog Democrat, but that hasn't really been a useful self-ID since most of the last of my kind have been voted out of office within the last 10 years.
 

El Correcto

god is dead
Only because they're largely no longer electable within the Democratic party. But they have still existed historically. I'd call myself a Blue Dog Democrat, but that hasn't really been a useful self-ID since most of the last of my kind have been voted out of office within the last 10 years.
It’s an extremist party pushing a red agenda.

I heard this guy on Joe Rogan call himself center left and a huge Bernie supporter.

I couldn’t stop laughing at the delusion these people have over being even close to the center of the political spectrum. They are truly in an ideological bubble that will burst the second they meet someone who doesn’t browse twitter and reddit daily.
 
Top