This article was fair and balanced. I'm glad you read it other side.Thus, yes the republicans blew it, but as the article points out Obama has many holes(lies) in his tax plan...So, I hope your not believing Bama's tax system is gonna walk on water...The system really hurts new jobs created by small business...And 80% of new jobs are created by small business....Where is the trillion $ going to come from?..
It didn't seem very balanced to me. I'm betting TOS went straight for republican part. I pretty sure it was a push not to vote Democrat this year.
I do agree with Republican part too. If republican politicians stuck with their core beliefs we wouldn't be in as big of mess as we are now. Our Government has almost become a separate entity from the people. It's too big and too divided in itself. We need change alright, but first this country needs to wake up and see that is not a Democrat or Republican problem, but our Government as a whole (of course I'm the one who's dreaming if I ever expect that to actually happen).
I'd say, with either candidate, in the long run were all ed. But in this day an age an all Liberal Government will cause the worst ass raping this country has ever seen.
This is my favorite part:
One interesting point: If Barack Obama was applying for a security clearance as a government employee, these associations would disqualify him. We are, my friends, about to have a president who doesn't qualify for a security clearance. Pretty pathetic. If Barack Obama becomes president, he would not even qualify to be his own bodyguard.
Here's another winner:
I'm a lawyer, and I've always had this strange idea that the U.S. Supreme Court should base its decisions on the supreme law of our land, our Constitution. Many people think differently these days. A recent and rather shocking survey showed that around 80% of people who support Barack Obama believe that the Supreme Court should base its decisions not on the Constitution, but on what's "fair." Egad! On the other hand, the strong majority of McCain voters believe that the Supremes should look to our Constitution as the final authority.
Let's just make this short and sweet, because I know you want to get out of here. If Barack Obama gets those two nominations, and if the Democrat Senate rubber-stamps them, then we are going to have a Supreme Court making decisions based on their liberal definition of "fairness" with some consideration to foreign court decisions tossed in. This is perhaps Obama's greatest opportunity to do permanent damage to our Republic; permanent and irreparable damage. It's one thing when Barack Obama talks about wealth seizure and redistribution in terms of "fairness." It's quite another when that talk is legitimized by a Supreme Court decision.
Last edited: