Media Bias

refineryworker05

Well-Known Member
Show me these Republicans who are thoroughly in the media! As for BLM, it was started on a lie that a young Black man was executed while on his knees saying "Stop! Don't shoot!" And pushes the narrative that Blacks are being killed in droves across the country by racist White cops. Simply not true, and their rhetoric got a number of cops killed by Blacks who believed them. Are there bad cops doing bad things? Sometimes yes. But the vast majority, more than 90%, of Black murders are committed by other Blacks. And until the rhetoric matches the reality people like BLM and White liberals who fan the flames are hurting, not healing, the racial divide.

I don’t care what you falsely believe about BLM. All, I’m asking is what would it take for you to believe an organization like BLM for example if they claimed that the media was out to get them. What proof would you require?

And have republicans supplied that level of proof when they make the insane claim that the media is out to get them?
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Off the top of my head, here’s who I can name.

Paul Gigot, Peggy Noonan, David Brooks, George Will, Stephen Hayes, Ross Douhart, Robert Costa, Dave Wiegal, Mike Barone, Carline Baum, Charles Krauthammer, Megyn Kelly, Bill Kristol, and there are many many more.
Yes there are conservative columnists. Now show me the newspapers and networks who endorsed Republican candidates, especially at the presidential level, in the last 25 years.
 

refineryworker05

Well-Known Member
They came up with plenty. Deny all you want, but all those conservative PAC's weren't approved in what should've been a routine matter.
Ok if they came up with plenty why do they need one person? You see how that makes no sense? Something that would have required multiple people to carry out, republicans in Congress investigate this other government entities investigate it as well and they find nothing. And you focus on one person pleading the fifth as stopping the investigation.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
I don’t care what you falsely believe about BLM. All, I’m asking is what would it take for you to believe an organization like BLM for example if they claimed that the media was out to get them. What proof would you require?

And have republicans supplied that level of proof when they make the insane claim that the media is out to get them?
BLM isn't a conservative political party so it's not a fair comparison. And falsely believe? Their lies got idiots worked up to the point they killed policemen. They're on video calling for cops to be killed. And it's an FBI stat that the perpetrators of Black murders are more than 90% of the time other Blacks.
 

refineryworker05

Well-Known Member
Yes there are conservative columnists. Now show me the newspapers and networks who endorsed Republican candidates, especially at the presidential level, in the last 25 years.
Man is this? I’m not going through that kind of research.

Bottomline is these republicans and many more write at those newspaper, are on tv talking about politics, they are everywhere. Not to mention all the republican elected officials who get interviewed.

Objectively and factually there isn’t any section of the political media in which republicans are not represented and speaking from their own perspective.

Again a media that was out to get republicans would not allow this to be the case.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Ok if they came up with plenty why do they need one person? You see how that makes no sense? Something that would have required multiple people to carry out, republicans in Congress investigate this other government entities investigate it as well and they find nothing. And you focus on one person pleading the fifth as stopping the investigation.
They don't have the smoking gun such as an email from the White House telling her to do such. As long as she doesn't implicate herself there's not much they can do. It's called evidence.
 

refineryworker05

Well-Known Member
BLM isn't a conservative political party so it's not a fair comparison. And falsely believe? Their lies got idiots worked up to the point they killed policemen. They're on video calling for cops to be killed. And it's an FBI stat that the perpetrators of Black murders are more than 90% of the time other Blacks.


So only the conservative political party can say the media is out to get them?

What proof would you require from an political organization you don’t like, if they made the insane claim the media was out to get them?

And have republicans supplied that same level of proof for their insane claim that the media is out to get them?
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
So only the conservative political party can say the media is out to get them?

What proof would you require from an political organization you don’t like, if they made the insane claim the media was out to get them?

And have republicans supplied that same level of proof for their insane claim that the media is out to get them?
So in your estimation the media has been totally fair and objective? Try counting the favorable articles written about Trump and other Republicans and compare that number to what was written about Hillary and Democrats.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Man is this? I’m not going through that kind of research.

Bottomline is these republicans and many more write at those newspaper, are on tv talking about politics, they are everywhere. Not to mention all the republican elected officials who get interviewed.

Objectively and factually there isn’t any section of the political media in which republicans are not represented and speaking from their own perspective.

Again a media that was out to get republicans would not allow this to be the case.
Show me the endorsements, the glowing support.
 

refineryworker05

Well-Known Member
They don't have the smoking gun such as an email from the White House telling her to do such. As long as she doesn't implicate herself there's not much they can do. It's called evidence.

So the only way to prove a crime was committed was through an email saying that we are gonna break the law. Lol. Seriously See the logic you are using?

So they couldn’t get any of the other numerous people that had to be involved to corroborate anything?

How does the criminal justice system convict anyone if they don’t admit it on email. Think about all the political crimes that were broken before they existence of email. How’d they do it?

So now they could find nothing because one person pleaded the fifth and because of emails. Lol. Tell me more?
 

refineryworker05

Well-Known Member
So in your estimation the media has been totally fair and objective? Try counting the favorable articles written about Trump and other Republicans and compare that number to what was written about Hillary and Democrats.


That’s all opinion, who cares. I don’t.

I’m asking you again, if an organization that you don’t like made the insane claim that the media was out to get them, what proof would you require to believe them?

Have republicans supplied that level of proof to support their insane claim that the media is out to get them?
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
So the only way to prove a crime was committed was through an email saying that we are gonna break the law. Lol. Seriously See the logic you are using?

So they couldn’t get any of the other numerous people that had to be involved to corroborate anything?

How does the criminal justice system convict anyone if they don’t admit it on email. Think about all the political crimes that were broken before they existence of email. How’d they do it?

So now they could find nothing because one person pleaded the fifth and because of emails. Lol. Tell me more?
Did I say that was the only way? They know it was done. Was it a crime? Unless she admits that she conspired with the administration to deny citizens their constitutional rights then she can just claim they didn't meet certain standards, no matter how it looks. But we'll never know because she refused to answer questions.
 

refineryworker05

Well-Known Member
Show me the endorsements, the glowing support.
You look it up yourself. I have no idea how many newspapers that exist in each state and local papers you are talking thousands of newspapers. I have no idea who they endorsed nor have I ever heard of most of them.

So an investigation by me would be thoroughly incomplete because I don’t have that kind of time. Nor again do I even know the names of all the various state and local newspapers around the nation. So it is a silly question for those reasons.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
That’s all opinion, who cares. I don’t.

I’m asking you again, if an organization that you don’t like made the insane claim that the media was out to get them, what proof would you require to believe them?

Have republicans supplied that level of proof to support their insane claim that the media is out to get them?
Yeah you don't care because you want to paint Republicans a certain way. Which falls in line with the smears leveled against Republicans on a constant basis for decades now. Yeah, you care, but Republicans don't. Republicans believe in insane fantasies according to you. Exactly the kind of stuff Republicans are pointing out that goes on all the time. Smear merchants. Guess what chum, Republican policies are going to set the economy right and then people will realize all Democrats have are smears. And judging by election results looks like most people already realize it.
 
Top