refineryworker05
Well-Known Member
Again, your belief that the only way to convict someone of a crime is if they admit to the crime makes no logical sense. It is not true at all. And yet you keep posting it. Lol
Media Bias
- Thread starter wkmac
- Start date
Again, your belief that the only way to convict someone of a crime is if they admit to the crime makes no logical sense. It is not true at all. And yet you keep posting it. Lol
This is common knowledge, where have you been?
All it takes is for them to say they didn't meet a certain standard. And doesn't change the fact that it did happen. The crime isn't that the applications were denied. The crime would be in the intent. And if they don't admit to the intent then what do the prosecutors do? Say they know what the IRS was thinking? To convict on conspiracy you need tangible evidence that a conspiracy took place. If no emails, memos, recordings, etc where the intent to deny rights is demonstrated then it's conjecture.
refineryworker05
Well-Known Member
I work for refinery. I’m in management. The number of emails that get transmitted over corrdinating simple info is mind boggling.
Let alone the emails it would take to coordinate people to purposefully break the law. Would require a massive amount of repeated communication and correction.
Come on this isn’t difficult.
To imagine that no one would have said I’m not breaking the law. To imagine that there would be no evidence, no ability to get witnesses, no way to charge anyone with a crime all because of one person pleading the fifth and not admitting to breaking the law in email makes no sense.
refineryworker05
Well-Known Member
Sure is, doesnt dispute my point about state and city and local papers that are ndependent of that and there are thousands of those papers.
No, there aren't. Look them up.
refineryworker05
Well-Known Member
So we are back to belief, which is my point republicans believe a lot of insane things. Like the irs being out to get them. They can’t prove it, but they know. Lol they know that those irs workers were out to get them.
Doesn't change the fact that almost all those conservative PAC's were denied while all the liberal ones were approved. Doesn't change the fact that the head of that office was subpoenaed and under oath refused to answer why it happened. Refused to say anything. You can laugh and scoff all you want, these are irrefutable facts.
Not to mention Hillary Clinton deleted 33,000 emails and used the bleachbit program to "wipe" her server clean while under subpoena. Where's the prosecution? These are known facts.
refineryworker05
Well-Known Member
Doesn’t change the fact that it was all investigated and lead to nothing. I know. I know unless one person admits to breaking the law nothing can ever be proven. But you knkw, you knkw despite the lack of evidence that anyone broke the law or were out to get conservatives that’s what it was and it was all coordinated from the White House and no witnesses, no paper trail, no evidence, nothing. Lol
All because of one person not admitting they broke the law in an email. republicans in Congress or the justice department or the treasury inspector general can’t prove that the irs was out to get republicans. Lol.
refineryworker05
Well-Known Member
Lol
moreluck
golden ticket member
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
You're delusional.
Republicans are complete hypocrites. They spin that kind of crap to small minded poor people stupid enough to believe them. Truth is, they've been in power plenty of times, and they've never done it..... because they don't want to.
They're doing it now. Things evolve.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
hold your breath
Can't. I'm already holding my nose over your idiocy.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
Really? Most men have two.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
Child brides? Nah just you.
True, I have a harem. And until the other one drops you have....
