That's called a Ponzi scheme.
All benefits should be paid from a money that was already put in on that members behalf.
I agree but it would appear now this is not the case. I often hear that the CS troubles are a result of so many trucking companies going out of business in the 80's and at some point is true as a factor (not root cause) but that era is now 30 years ago and seems to me the number of orphan retirees from that era would be also purged out by now.
I would think the bigger effect these days would be the economic downturn in 2008' as it relates to assets and how that factors in. And yes I know the situation at Yellow doesn't help either. I was hoping that in 08' when we left CS, the lump sum payment would somehow be set aside for UPSers only in case the worst would occur but that appears to have been wishful thinking and I kinda knew that then as well.
Now here's the really hard question and it's one a lot of UPSers likely don't want to hear and this question is for the Fters who say have 20 plus years in. Would you give up a pay raise or 2 that makes sure UPS retirees (especially the pre-2008 retirees) aren't harmed by what could be about to happen at CS? Are we willing to do what it takes to take care of our own? Are we willing to lead this and set an example?
I would and wouldn't bat an eye about it either. If we are willing to pay a little now to restore retirement integrity (I hope I don't regret using that word LOL!) not only might we save it for our brother/sister UPSer retirees but for ourselves and put the future retirement for our younger union/UPS brothers/sisters who are early in their career. Unionism use to stand for fraternity and mutual aid/interest and it's way past time we turned back to those roots. You want the younger folk to join the union? Then show them something worth joining. And what would the message be to America about unions were we to make such a sacrifice? Even to Corp. America?
Think about it!