Nancy Pelosi's husband attacked in family home

[rod]

Gotta kick the hornets nest once in a while.
View attachment 406340
Sometimes they see him in their breakfast to.

Is that Elvis?

 

[728ups]

Seems the Conspiracy Theory of both being in their under drawers wasnt correct,Big Surprise!

Fact check: Paul Pelosi and alleged attacker were both clothed when police arrived

KTVU Fox 2 mistakenly reported that David DePape was in his underwear at the time of his attack on Paul Pelosi; they've since retracted the report.

news.yahoo.com

Fact check: Paul Pelosi and alleged attacker were both clothed when police arrived​

The claim: Paul Pelosi and his attacker were in their underwear when police showed up​

David DePape, accused of attacking Paul Pelosi on Oct. 28, has been charged with attempted murder, assault with a deadly weapon and burglary, among other counts.

Following the attack, social media users have shared a variety of false claims regarding the incident. One of these claims is that Pelosi and DePape were in their underwear when police arrived at the scene.

"Paul Pelosi & his attacker were half naked when the police showed up," says an Oct. 28 Instagram post. "They were both in their underwear."

Follow us on Facebook! Like our page to get updates throughout the day on our latest debunks

The post garnered more than 60,000 likes in the first four days. Similar iterations have been shared on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter.

The claims are false. A news outlet mistakenly reported that DePape was in his underwear at the time of the attack, but has since published a correction. DePape was wearing shorts while Pelosi was wearing a pajama shirt and boxer shorts, police said.

USA TODAY reached out to the social media user who shared the post for comment.

No evidence that Pelosi and DePape were in their underwear​

KTVU Fox 2 in the Bay Area initially reported that DePape was in his underwear when apprehended, according to Politico. The news outlet has since corrected the mistake, adding an editor's note to the bottom of its Oct. 28 article.

"CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story misstated what clothing the suspect was wearing when officers found him," reads the note.

The district court's criminal complaint says DePape was wearing shorts at the time of the attack.

"Officers removed a cell phone, cash, clipper cards and an unidentified card from DEPAPE’s right shorts pocket," reads the complaint.

Fact check: False claim that security cameras malfunctioned during break-in at Pelosi residence

Pelosi was wearing a pajama shirt and boxers at the time.


1.5k

• 
  
  
  

• Paul Pelosi

Fact check: Paul Pelosi and alleged attacker were both clothed when police arrived​

Hannah Hudnall, USA TODAY
Wed, November 2, 2022 at 6:49 PM·3 min read


In this article:

• 
  
  
  

• Paul Pelosi
  American businessman (born 1940)

The claim: Paul Pelosi and his attacker were in their underwear when police showed up​

David DePape, accused of attacking Paul Pelosi on Oct. 28, has been charged with attempted murder, assault with a deadly weapon and burglary, among other counts.
Following the attack, social media users have shared a variety of false claims regarding the incident. One of these claims is that Pelosi and DePape were in their underwear when police arrived at the scene.
"Paul Pelosi & his attacker were half naked when the police showed up," says an Oct. 28 Instagram post. "They were both in their underwear."
Follow us on Facebook! Like our page to get updates throughout the day on our latest debunks
The post garnered more than 60,000 likes in the first four days. Similar iterations have been shared on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter.
The claims are false. A news outlet mistakenly reported that DePape was in his underwear at the time of the attack, but has since published a correction. DePape was wearing shorts while Pelosi was wearing a pajama shirt and boxer shorts, police said.
USA TODAY reached out to the social media user who shared the post for comment.

No evidence that Pelosi and DePape were in their underwear​

KTVU Fox 2 in the Bay Area initially reported that DePape was in his underwear when apprehended, according to Politico. The news outlet has since corrected the mistake, adding an editor's note to the bottom of its Oct. 28 article.
"CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story misstated what clothing the suspect was wearing when officers found him," reads the note.
The district court's criminal complaint says DePape was wearing shorts at the time of the attack.
"Officers removed a cell phone, cash, clipper cards and an unidentified card from DEPAPE’s right shorts pocket," reads the complaint.
Fact check: False claim that security cameras malfunctioned during break-in at Pelosi residence
Pelosi was wearing a pajama shirt and boxers at the time.
"Mr. Pelosi, who was sleeping, was wearing a loose-fitting pajama shirt and boxer shorts," District Attorney Brooke Jenkins said at an Oct. 31 press conference.
DePape has pleaded not guilty and remains in jail.
USA TODAY reached out to the San Francisco Police Department for comment.
This claim has been debunked by PolitiFact, AP News and FactCheck.org.

Our rating: False​

Based on our research, we rate FALSE the claim that Pelosi and his attacker were in their underwear when police showed up. A news outlet mistakenly reported that DePape was in his underwear at the time of the attack but has since corrected itself. DePape was wearing shorts, and Pelosi was wearing a pajama shirt and boxer shorts.

Our fact-check sources:​

• Politico, Oct. 31, Prominent conservatives share online disinformation about Paul Pelosi assault
• KTVU Fox 2, Oct. 28, Alleged Pelosi intruder has manifesto of conspiracy theories: sources
• U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, Oct. 31, Criminal Complaint
• San Francisco District Attorney's Office, Oct. 31, Facebook post
• PolitiFact, Oct. 31, Misinformation fuels false narratives about attack on Paul Pelosi
• AP News, Nov. 1, False, unfounded claims distort attack on Paul Pelosi
• FactCheck.org, Nov. 1, Conservative Figures Spread Baseless Claims About Attack on Paul Pelosi
• USA TODAY, Nov. 1, Alleged Paul Pelosi attacker pleads not guilty at court appearance; will remain jailed
• USA TODAY, Nov. 2, Fact check: False claim that security cameras malfunctioned during break-in at Pelosi residence

 

[sailfish]

@bottomups,

Who told you this?

Or did you think it up on your own?

Someone dressed like a priest butt raped him as a child or something so now he seizes every opportunity to bitch about Christianity all over the place on here. Nothing more to think into it about.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

I love how the entire mainstream media put out the facts about this story, then completely changed the facts, and are now calling people conspiracy theorists for believing them in the first place.

Clown world.

 

[newolddude]

I love how the entire mainstream media put out the facts about this story, then completely changed the facts, and are now calling people conspiracy theorists for believing them in the first place.

Clown world.

What facts are you talking about?

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

What facts are you talking about?

Why are you gaslighting?

 

[Fred's Myth]

Someone dressed like a priest butt raped him as a child or something so now he seizes every opportunity to bitch about Christianity all over the place on here. Nothing more to think into it about.

He liked it so much he named himself @bottomups !

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Politico says police were let in by an unknown person and then found Pelosi and Depape.

Politico edits their article, then says you're a conspiracy theorist if you suggest there was a third person.

Clown world....

 

[wilberforce15]

Seems the Conspiracy Theory of both being in their under drawers wasnt correct,Big Surprise!

Fact check: Paul Pelosi and alleged attacker were both clothed when police arrived

KTVU Fox 2 mistakenly reported that David DePape was in his underwear at the time of his attack on Paul Pelosi; they've since retracted the report.

news.yahoo.com

Fact check: Paul Pelosi and alleged attacker were both clothed when police arrived​

The claim: Paul Pelosi and his attacker were in their underwear when police showed up​

David DePape, accused of attacking Paul Pelosi on Oct. 28, has been charged with attempted murder, assault with a deadly weapon and burglary, among other counts.

Following the attack, social media users have shared a variety of false claims regarding the incident. One of these claims is that Pelosi and DePape were in their underwear when police arrived at the scene.

"Paul Pelosi & his attacker were half naked when the police showed up," says an Oct. 28 Instagram post. "They were both in their underwear."

Follow us on Facebook! Like our page to get updates throughout the day on our latest debunks

The post garnered more than 60,000 likes in the first four days. Similar iterations have been shared on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter.

The claims are false. A news outlet mistakenly reported that DePape was in his underwear at the time of the attack, but has since published a correction. DePape was wearing shorts while Pelosi was wearing a pajama shirt and boxer shorts, police said.

USA TODAY reached out to the social media user who shared the post for comment.

No evidence that Pelosi and DePape were in their underwear​

KTVU Fox 2 in the Bay Area initially reported that DePape was in his underwear when apprehended, according to Politico. The news outlet has since corrected the mistake, adding an editor's note to the bottom of its Oct. 28 article.

"CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story misstated what clothing the suspect was wearing when officers found him," reads the note.

The district court's criminal complaint says DePape was wearing shorts at the time of the attack.

"Officers removed a cell phone, cash, clipper cards and an unidentified card from DEPAPE’s right shorts pocket," reads the complaint.

Fact check: False claim that security cameras malfunctioned during break-in at Pelosi residence

Pelosi was wearing a pajama shirt and boxers at the time.


1.5k

• 
  
  
  
• Paul Pelosi

Fact check: Paul Pelosi and alleged attacker were both clothed when police arrived​

Hannah Hudnall, USA TODAY
Wed, November 2, 2022 at 6:49 PM·3 min read


In this article:

• 
  
  
  
• Paul Pelosi
  American businessman (born 1940)

The claim: Paul Pelosi and his attacker were in their underwear when police showed up​

David DePape, accused of attacking Paul Pelosi on Oct. 28, has been charged with attempted murder, assault with a deadly weapon and burglary, among other counts.
Following the attack, social media users have shared a variety of false claims regarding the incident. One of these claims is that Pelosi and DePape were in their underwear when police arrived at the scene.
"Paul Pelosi & his attacker were half naked when the police showed up," says an Oct. 28 Instagram post. "They were both in their underwear."
Follow us on Facebook! Like our page to get updates throughout the day on our latest debunks
The post garnered more than 60,000 likes in the first four days. Similar iterations have been shared on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter.
The claims are false. A news outlet mistakenly reported that DePape was in his underwear at the time of the attack, but has since published a correction. DePape was wearing shorts while Pelosi was wearing a pajama shirt and boxer shorts, police said.
USA TODAY reached out to the social media user who shared the post for comment.

No evidence that Pelosi and DePape were in their underwear​

KTVU Fox 2 in the Bay Area initially reported that DePape was in his underwear when apprehended, according to Politico. The news outlet has since corrected the mistake, adding an editor's note to the bottom of its Oct. 28 article.
"CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story misstated what clothing the suspect was wearing when officers found him," reads the note.
The district court's criminal complaint says DePape was wearing shorts at the time of the attack.
"Officers removed a cell phone, cash, clipper cards and an unidentified card from DEPAPE’s right shorts pocket," reads the complaint.
Fact check: False claim that security cameras malfunctioned during break-in at Pelosi residence
Pelosi was wearing a pajama shirt and boxers at the time.
"Mr. Pelosi, who was sleeping, was wearing a loose-fitting pajama shirt and boxer shorts," District Attorney Brooke Jenkins said at an Oct. 31 press conference.
DePape has pleaded not guilty and remains in jail.
USA TODAY reached out to the San Francisco Police Department for comment.
This claim has been debunked by PolitiFact, AP News and FactCheck.org.

Our rating: False​

Based on our research, we rate FALSE the claim that Pelosi and his attacker were in their underwear when police showed up. A news outlet mistakenly reported that DePape was in his underwear at the time of the attack but has since corrected itself. DePape was wearing shorts, and Pelosi was wearing a pajama shirt and boxer shorts.

Our fact-check sources:​

• Politico, Oct. 31, Prominent conservatives share online disinformation about Paul Pelosi assault
• KTVU Fox 2, Oct. 28, Alleged Pelosi intruder has manifesto of conspiracy theories: sources
• U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, Oct. 31, Criminal Complaint
• San Francisco District Attorney's Office, Oct. 31, Facebook post
• PolitiFact, Oct. 31, Misinformation fuels false narratives about attack on Paul Pelosi
• AP News, Nov. 1, False, unfounded claims distort attack on Paul Pelosi
• FactCheck.org, Nov. 1, Conservative Figures Spread Baseless Claims About Attack on Paul Pelosi
• USA TODAY, Nov. 1, Alleged Paul Pelosi attacker pleads not guilty at court appearance; will remain jailed
• USA TODAY, Nov. 2, Fact check: False claim that security cameras malfunctioned during break-in at Pelosi residence

Yes, a few days pass and a few threats are made, and magically the original reports change.

 

[wilberforce15]

Cop-cam.

Door video.

They can solve this. They choose not to do so.
Instead, they choose to intimidate and make people change stories.

 

[Gotta Go]

 

[BrownFlush]

This is good news.
I wasn't sure if we still had immigration officials.

 

[Ou812fu]

Cop-cam.

Door video.

They can solve this. They choose not to do so.
Instead, they choose to intimidate and make people change stories.

At this point they have had plenty of time to edit the video. Prepare video coming shortly..

 

[wilberforce15]

At this point they have had plenty of time to edit the video. Prepare video coming shortly..

Yep. Which is why the early release is so important. They quite easily can re-film the whole thing a dozen times over by now.

 

[Wally]

Desperate Obama and Biden using what the illegal alien did to work up the folk.

 

[Darmark7]

Sometimes you have to get rid of evidence that first comes out so your lie can take hold of sheep that believe whatever they are told no matter how many times it changes.

Once you open the link Scroll down to the video.

PrincessDeb on Gab: '9/11 INSIDE JOB PENTAGON SHORT 2.6 TRILLION DOLLA…'

 

[El Correcto]

These people didn't care when Rand Paul and his wife were attacked by a leftist mob. They didn't care when a nut tried to kill a supreme court justice. They cheered and laughed when the secret service had to secure the President in the white house while a BLM mob tried to breach the grounds.

These people don't care about Paul Pelosi.
Paul Pelosi is just a tool for them to attack Republicans for a few days.

It will be some other stupid thing in no time.

1. Surrounded by protestors and yelled at after they chose to walk there
2. Some nut sat outside by one of their houses on a 9/11 call for attention, assassins don’t call the police on themselves.
3. Peaceful protest, no one killed.
4. I care deeply for Paul Pelosi’s plight. No one deserves to have their home broken into and struck in the head with a hammer fracturing his skull.
5. None of this is stupid, that’s just your narcissistic cynicism talking, you need to cut that out I’m worried about you fren.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

They cheered and laughed when the secret service had to secure the President in the white house while a BLM mob tried to breach the grounds.

Peaceful protest

Peacefully throwing bricks and bottles, lighting cars on fire, and trying to burn down a church.

You're better than this.

 

[Ou812fu]

1. Surrounded by protestors and yelled at after they chose to walk there
2. Some nut sat outside by one of their houses on a 9/11 call for attention, assassins don’t call the police on themselves.
3. Peaceful protest, no one killed.
4. I care deeply for Paul Pelosi’s plight. No one deserves to have their home broken into and struck in the head with a hammer fracturing his skull.
5. None of this is stupid, that’s just your narcissistic cynicism talking, you need to cut that out I’m worried about you fren.

Is the devil real?

 

[Ou812fu]

This should say an awful lot about how much B's the pelosi thing is...



JUST IN - Police respond to a trespassing call at Trump's Mar-a-Lago.