blue efficacy
Well-Known Member
What I see here are a lot of self centered people who have great insurance already, and are not part of the population who desperately needs it.
Government health care is bad? Ask old people about Medicare. Most like it very well. Government run!
"I don't want the gov't telling my doctor what they can do!" News for ya. Insurance companies are already doing just that. And since they get to skim off the top, they have a greater motive to deny care that a patient might really need.
What we have right now, is waste, waste, waste. Billions are made by the insurance industry. Dealing with the insurance companies is an extremely large expense for health care providers, which of course must be passed on to the consumers of health care. A single payer system, for instance, would allow all of this waste to be spent on health care directly, rather than be given to an insurance company executive.
As the system is right now, the insurers are plundering billions of dollars that could be used to save lives. This is, plain and simply, blood money.
And there would be the benefit of providing health care to millions who need it and aren't getting it now. But to view that as a benefit, you'd have to care about other people.
Alas, many Americans are complacent, willing to accept this god awful system. If any of you get cancer, diabetes, or any other chronic condition, you will look at things a whole lot differently. It's easy to say the insurance system is fine if you only use it for an occasional strep throat or something along those lines.
If you ever really need it, you would in fact see just how malicious these corporations are. They don't make such exorbitant profits by providing care to everyone who needs it, that's for sure!
There is a lot of misinformation that is being spread around by so-called "grassroots" organizations funded by insurance companies. Misinformation is being too kind, actually, as it is mostly downright lies.
I would gladly suffer increased wait time for non-essential care if it meant everybody got care. This is where your typical "me-me-me!" conservative would disagree.
Despite the economic reasons in favor of it, that is not the main reason I support it.
I support it because it is the right thing to do. What's right isn't always popular, and what's popular isn't always right. If it was, you'd still see a host of lynchings in the deep south to this very day, I reckon.
Government health care is bad? Ask old people about Medicare. Most like it very well. Government run!
"I don't want the gov't telling my doctor what they can do!" News for ya. Insurance companies are already doing just that. And since they get to skim off the top, they have a greater motive to deny care that a patient might really need.
What we have right now, is waste, waste, waste. Billions are made by the insurance industry. Dealing with the insurance companies is an extremely large expense for health care providers, which of course must be passed on to the consumers of health care. A single payer system, for instance, would allow all of this waste to be spent on health care directly, rather than be given to an insurance company executive.
As the system is right now, the insurers are plundering billions of dollars that could be used to save lives. This is, plain and simply, blood money.
And there would be the benefit of providing health care to millions who need it and aren't getting it now. But to view that as a benefit, you'd have to care about other people.
Alas, many Americans are complacent, willing to accept this god awful system. If any of you get cancer, diabetes, or any other chronic condition, you will look at things a whole lot differently. It's easy to say the insurance system is fine if you only use it for an occasional strep throat or something along those lines.
If you ever really need it, you would in fact see just how malicious these corporations are. They don't make such exorbitant profits by providing care to everyone who needs it, that's for sure!
There is a lot of misinformation that is being spread around by so-called "grassroots" organizations funded by insurance companies. Misinformation is being too kind, actually, as it is mostly downright lies.
I would gladly suffer increased wait time for non-essential care if it meant everybody got care. This is where your typical "me-me-me!" conservative would disagree.
Despite the economic reasons in favor of it, that is not the main reason I support it.
I support it because it is the right thing to do. What's right isn't always popular, and what's popular isn't always right. If it was, you'd still see a host of lynchings in the deep south to this very day, I reckon.