Actually the 9.5 language was headed in the right place. It is good enforceable language. BUT the problem is it divides the drivers with less than 4 years seniority that management play musical routes
It is.... in the right place.
It is NOT...in the right place and I'll tell you why.
The system in place is designed to play out over multiple grievances in a 5 month period.
It makes no sense to allow the company "a bite of the apple" twice a year.
Why not opt-in until you opt-out?
The way I read it, this system isn't designed to be a vehicle to enable an employee to make extra money, rather an avenue to control unwanted OT.
While I can see why the powers that be would want to protect against employees flip flopping back and forth from on the list to off the list, but why not have it where once you're on the list you stay on for 5 months and beyond until you opt-out?
I have nine total 9.5 grievances dating back to the inception of this language in the Central Region and spans over two 5 month periods.
Not one of them has been paid or even heard at a panel, let alone went before the subsequent committees or Vice Presidents or Union's Co-Chairs as provided for to solve the excessive OT problem.
There is no way for this language to mesh with snails pace local grievance machinery and panel system in place in my state.