New vote no page ADMIN

[Bubblehead]

Almost 50%

I remembered it as less but what does that tell you about how much of a priority it was for your members.

...and 50% is well above the national average.
Not bad for a bunch of part-timers.

 

[Instigator]

I see you have no facts. Other that you are a part timer that's supposedly on the negotiating committee and you like to throw insults. Your u should fit right in here. I understand you can't hang with the big boys. So I'll take you with a grain of salt.

Have all the facts about the Louisville Air Supplement you can handle. It amazes me that people like you want to debate those issues without the slightest bit of knowledge about it. The only reason I felt compelled to respond to the crap you and others were spewing on here is to present the facts and keep you fellas from having a stroke.

 

[IVE GOTTA PACKAGE 4U]

...and 50% is well above the national average.
Not bad for a bunch of part-timers.

38% on the national??

 

[Lead Belly]

Have all the facts about the Louisville Air Supplement you can handle. It amazes me that people like you want to debate those issues without the slightest bit of knowledge about it. The only reason I felt compelled to respond to the crap you and others were spewing on here is to present the facts and keep you fellas from having a stroke.

No offense but there are a lot of people on here that know all kind of facts. You just don't want to here them.

 

[Lead Belly]

...and 50% is well above the national average.
Not bad for a bunch of part-timers.

It was more like 43% and for everyone to walk over this issue you'd expect it to be more like a 85% turnout. Ya think.

 

[Turdferguson]

Crazy talk! We can't be doing that here

 

[realbrown1]

What was the percentage of members that actually voted on your supplements. The second time in particular. What was this ratio?

This does not matter.

You never consider the wants of those who won't even be bothered to vote.

 

[Instigator]

You didn't answer the question about Florida genius.

I did answer the question about Florida genius. It's post #165. I know you're having a hard time keeping up.

 

[IVE GOTTA PACKAGE 4U]

 

[5habits100]

I did answer the question about Florida genius. It's post #165. I know you're having a hard time keeping up.

If that the case you are a troll because they weren't. That son is a fact go troll somewhere else.

 

[Bubblehead]

Amazon was getting very impatient that the contract wasn't done in the spring of 2013. They put pressure on UPS to get it done. When they're shipping 1 out of 10 packages you tend to listen. If Amazon pulled their business how many layoffs would there be? I remember how many customers we lost in 1997 when we had a bigger market share. How many layoffs would there be if we lost Amazon?

Common Sense.

Now I am ever more disappointed.

Not sure if this was the case, but if it was, wouldn't that be an additional bargaining chip for the Teamsters?

We aren't talking about a company teetering on the brink of insolvency like Hostess or YRC, this is UPS, a company at the top of their game.
Like you said 1 out of 10 packages, you tend to listen.
I don't think UPS would be willing to throw the baby out with the bathwater.

If Amazon was truly putting the pinch on UPS to get us under contract, that put us in a position of strength, not a position to impose concessions.

What you call common sense, I call weakness and inefficient bargaining.

 

[Instigator]

No offense but there are a lot of people on here that know all kind of facts. You just don't want to here them.

Its "hear" not "here". I was right about you being mentally challenged.

 

[5habits100]

Now I am ever more disappointed.

Not sure if this was the case, but if it was, wouldn't that be an additional bargaining chip for the Teamsters?

We aren't talking about a company teetering on the brink of insolvency like Hostess or YRC, this is UPS, a company at the top of their game.
Like you said 1 out of 10 packages, you tend to listen.
I don't think UPS would be willing to throw the baby out with the bathwater.

If Amazon was truly putting the pinch on UPS to get us under contract, that put us in a position of strength, not a position to impose concessions.

What you call common sense, I call weakness and inefficient bargaining.

Or maybe you don't know what you are talking about. That is not meant to be a derogatory comment so don't get cranky. Some day I will explain it to you.

 

[Lead Belly]

Yes, the entire negotiating committee was there

What hotel did you stay at. What was your Perdiem

 

[Instigator]

If that the case you are a troll because they weren't. That son is a fact go troll somewhere else.

We were all in Sarasota for negotiations. Obviously you don't know what you're talking about.

 

[Bubblehead]

It was more like 43% and for everyone to walk over this issue you'd expect it to be more like a 85% turnout. Ya think.

No, I wouldn't.
85% would be unprecedented.

That was a great turnout for a prodimently part time bargaining unit.

 

[Instigator]

What hotel did you stay at. What was your Perdiem

It was the Hilton in Sarasota. My per diem is none of your business.

 

[5habits100]

We were all in Sarasota for negotiations. Obviously you don't know what you're talking about.

Sure thing.

 

[5habits100]

It was the Hilton in Sarasota. My per diem is none of your business.

Ok then

 

[Bubblehead]

Or maybe you don't know what you are talking about. That is not meant to be a derogatory comment so don't get cranky. Some day I will explain it to you.

Why not now?