Oil as a renewing resource? References, please. Is there some new theory of how oil came to be? I thought it was carbon-based life compressed over millions of years....if it is being created continuously, is the creation process faster than our usage rate?
It turns out Techgrrl that the answer to your good question on a new theory is yes and no. Yes it's new in the west or at least new in the since that we the people are beginning to hear of it but the other answer No is because in Russia this understanding that oil is renewable has been known for over half a century. In post 18 of this thread I linked
this article (linked again for you) concerning peak oil and this Russian geologic theory that challenges western thought on the subject matter. To even prove the theory the Russians have in fact been finding oil in areas deemed unproductive under western geologic teachings.
Now to take it one step further, Cornell Professor emeritus Thomas Gold in 1999' published his eye opening work,
"The Deep Hot Biosphere, The Myth of Fossile Fuels" which of course challenges the biogenic theory for the origins of oil. Google books has a review of this book and ironically it stops at page 38 where the chapter "The Origin of Petroleum, The Two Conflicting Theories" begins and the lone unfinished paragraph however IMO tells the tail of the bigger issue why we don't know the truth and that collution between industry and academia may be at play. Go to the book review link above, scroll down to page 38 and read it for yourself and draw your own conclusions.
Here is Gold's original paper published with the National Academy of Science in 1992' (influence for the later book) that discusses in more detail to your question on a new theory. In Gold's paper he discusses what is called "basement rock" formation and in googling that term in relation to oil, I'm surprised to learn of the many new oil finds in this type deep structure. As Professor Gold talks about deep life beyond the reach of sunlight and photosynthsis which are key to carbon creation and thus biogeneic process to oil, I watched a program last night on TV where they drained the oceans to explain what was at play and during the program they showed where in deep oceans beyond sunlight, they were finding coral and in various colors too. This coral defied the belief that in order to live and grow, coral needed sunlight so if coral can adapt in a new species to a purely chemical process beyond the need of photosynthesis, what does this further tell us about the Russian and now Professor Gold's suggestion that micro-chemical life might well be possible in deep earth depths and thus a source of renewable oil? It is an interesting question with an earthshaking possible answer.
Is there any evidence to support renewed oil in existing oilfields? Yes, right here in the good ole' USA off the coast of Louisiana on Eugene Island. In 1999' Christopher Copper, Staff Writer for the Wall Street Journal broke
a story about this very thing taking place there. Trying to understand the deeper meaning of this in a biogeneic construct might prove problematic but if you consider a "deep earth" explanation then the solution seems more readily at hand but now you have a severe challenge to the whole idea of peak oil.
Hope that provides some starting basis or at least an introducton to the concept Techgrrrl.
If we are at peak oil, how do we explain the many recent finds of oil in say Haiti, Venezuela or the Caspain as I linked in an earlier post? What about the many oil finds in the South China Sea or in Vietnam? Start googling and at first you may have to dig a bit but like wildcatting, you will strike oil and it will open your eyes. What you see above is only a very small tip of the iceberg so I hope this at least on a very basic level answers your question or at least gives basis for challenging the biogenic origin of oil in that oil is or might be renewable.
Here's a broader question to consider. If your currency is measured and linked to a commodity and that commodity is of limited supply, your currency will tend to hold a higher value. Pure supply and demand thing. If the commodity is say gold, the more gold, the less value the currency, the less gold the more value. In 71' when Bretton Woods collasped and Nixon closed the gold window for good, the US dollar becamed linked to the new commodity of the day, black gold or oil thus the term petro dollar. Now again using supply and demand, in whose interest is it to limit the global supply of oil and in whose interest is it to inflate that supply of oil? And who is being squeezed in the process?
Come On People THINK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!