DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
You are a liberal texican.You wouldn't know a liberal if you bit yourself in the ass.
You are a liberal texican.You wouldn't know a liberal if you bit yourself in the ass.
the conversation was about government socialism" and my point was republicans love certain big govt "socialist" programsNo, but to hear you tell it it's only Republicans. Democrats have gotten us into the 4 biggest wars of the last century. And they're sounding very hawkish about Russia.
Providing for defense is baked into the Constitution. It's not socialist. Using your military to control your own population is very socialist.the conversation was about government socialism" and my point was republicans love certain big govt "socialist" programs
Our current military is in large part a jobs program. That’s socialist.Providing for defense is baked into the Constitution. It's not socialist. Using your military to control your own population is very socialist.
americas military is used to controls its own and global populations.Providing for defense is baked into the Constitution. It's not socialist. Using your military to control your own population is very socialist.
Taxing the population and then using that tax money to pay for programs (like the military) the serve the common good is socialist. The fact that it's baked into the constitution just means that the founding fathers had no problem with socialism. Using the the military to control your own population is authoritarianism, not socialism. The two are not the same.Providing for defense is baked into the Constitution. It's not socialist. Using your military to control your own population is very socialist.
americas military is used to controls its own and global populations.
and government programs dont have to be about control to be "socialist"
And yet authoritarian regimes are usually socialist. And every system has taxes.Taxing the population and then using that tax money to pay for programs (like the military) the serve the common good is socialist. The fact that it's baked into the constitution just means that the founding fathers had no problem with socialism. Using the the military to control your own population is authoritarianism, not socialism. The two are not the same.
Then you should be all for it.Our current military is in large part a jobs program. That’s socialist.
They certainly can be, but often in name only. They can also be stable democracies like our European allies and, to a lesser extent, the USA.And yet authoritarian regimes are usually socialist.
So is it now a Democrat talking point that we've been socialist all along?They certainly can be, but often in name only. They can also be stable democracies like our European allies and, to a lesser extent, the USA.
We've always had elements of socialism in the USA. It's not a talking point.So is it now a Democrat talking point that we've been socialist all along?
thats just your twisted view. capitalism is authoritarian.And yet authoritarian regimes are usually socialist. And every system has taxes.
Who this thread is about supports full blown socialism. In other words a dumdum...Socialism isn't an either/or, it's a broad range of socio/economic policies that exist to some degree in just about every nation state.
capitalism has ruined america. deindustralization. corrupt government. pollution.
Dumdum. Try contributing to a society before you determine what others should contribute to you.capitalism has ruined america. deindustralization. corrupt government. pollution.
you were never free.
Not sure what you mean by "full blown socialism". I think the person in question definitely supports a greater degree of socialism than we currently have.Who this thread is about supports full blown socialism. In other words a dumdum...