I’m not sure I understand what you’re saying. If you think FedEx “showed him who’s who” or something of that nature, I’m not sure I’d agree. He had a contract not far from here that still remains open and covered by contingency. When you boil it all down, the contracts (for Patton) were the part of the business that were losing money.Look into Patton and tell me what you think. He seems "too big to fail". You'll understand. Most will not.
So if you mean “to big to fail” as in there’s always money to be made and can afford to jettison the unprofitable business, I 100% agree.