poophappens
Well-Known Member
According to the FAA they can't fly their drones. Looks like job security to me!
According to the FAA they can't fly their drones. Looks like job security to me!
Good. Drones should be illegal IMO. Too many stupid people out there. The harm to actual aircraft is too high to allow those things.According to the FAA they can't fly their drones.
That was a big threat.According to the FAA they can't fly their drones. Looks like job security to me!
We don't make crap on their packages so I'm not too worried about it anyway.Now if you can just convince them to stop sending their shiiiite through FedEx and the USPS we'd be golden.
It should all be limited to Class G airspace. Not that it matters though. A lot of the people buying the drones don't know the difference.Proposes a microUAS option that would allow operations in Class G airspace
We don't make crap on their packages so I'm not too worried about it anyway.
Growth at zero profit means nothing for a company as old as ups. Just look at the 4th quarter.Why would you not care? Maybe YOU aren't worried about Amazon and maybe YOU aren't happy with the profits on Amazon packages but plenty of other people are. The additional work would provide jobs for plenty of UPSers (and those not yet employed at UPS) around the country and keep work out of the hands of our competition. But I guess only those of us that care about the success and growth of the very company we work for "worry" about silly little details like that.
Growth at zero profit means nothing for a company as old as ups. Just look at the 4th quarter.
Doesn't really matter we are never going to see 100% of Amazon packages and we couldn't handle the volume anyway.
We don't make crap on their packages so I'm not too worried about it anyway.
From what I've seen, an 'Amazon Sort' is a pretty sweet gig for inside workers-PT or 22.3. Lots of smalls so the manager usually gets good #s, overall pkgs are pretty light for unloaders, sorters, & loaders.Why would you not care? Maybe YOU aren't worried about Amazon and maybe YOU aren't happy with the profits on Amazon packages but plenty of other people are. The additional work would provide jobs for plenty of UPSers (and those not yet employed at UPS) around the country and keep work out of the hands of our competition. But I guess only those of us that care about the success and growth of the very company we work for "worry" about silly little details like that.
I don't believe it was a failure I don't think upper management does but Wall Street did and that's all that matters.So you are saying it wouldn't be a good thing to get more volume from Amazon, which we could handle actually with some expanding we need need anyway, and provide more jobs for people just because you could care care less? Man, I'm glad you aren't in sales. Or maybe your are. They seem to be lacking lately.
And our fourth quarter wasn't the epic train wreck many in upper management would have you believe. It just wasn't.
I don't believe it was a failure I don't think upper management does but Wall Street did and that's all that matters.
Sure Amazon could add a lot of jobs for what 2-3 years. I mean they aren't signing a 20 year contract they could switch very easily then We would be screwed. That's why I am not worried about Amazon volume. I'd love volume from tons of other companies but not Amazon.
You said we would be golden with more Amazon. Low profit volume would not turn out well for us in the long run.
We need to grow all current business and add more.It does concern me that 40% or so of my daily stops are Amazon. How long can this last? I don't want that much dependence on a single company that can easily change the way they ship in a relatively short period of time.
Packages = Union jobsWe don't make crap on their packages so I'm not too worried about it anyway.
And supervision.Packages = Union jobs
Packages = Union jobs