Poor Ground guys…

vantexan

Well-Known Member
And with good reason. A school board meeting is an official public meeting and the people on that school board while volunteers are at that moment conducting for the record official government business and these people are being harassed and threatened.

As I mentioned earlier last night I had dinner with an individual who will announce his candidacy for statewide office later this week. He told me how amazed he is how some people are completely happy voting against their own interests for no other reason than the comfort of believing that they're hurting somebody they don't even know when in reality they are actually hurting themselves.

As we all know you're going to do to the same as your father did and take full advantage of state and social programs due to your failure to make enough money over the course of your lifetime to make the need for benefits unnecessary . Once again, the basic ideology of conservatism is simply this,.... if you're not rich.... it's YOUR fault.
My father made good money over his lifetime and still needs the social security check. Where did you get the idea that all conservatives are millionaires?

And people coming to school board meetings to complain about critical race theory aren't domestic terrorists nor is it within the jurisdiction of the FBI. As it so happens Garland's son-in-law is a vice-president of the company that distributes material to the 25% of school districts that are teaching critical race theory. Pure conflict of interest.
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
My father made good money over his lifetime and still needs the social security check. Where did you get the idea that all conservatives are millionaires?

And people coming to school board meetings to complain about critical race theory aren't domestic terrorists nor is it within the jurisdiction of the FBI. As it so happens Garland's son-in-law is a vice-president of the company that distributes material to the 25% of school districts that are teaching critical race theory. Pure conflict of interest.
If you're a person who wants to speak at a school board meeting you simply call and place your name on the evening agenda so that your comments can be placed on the record. A number of people refuse to comply with that requirement and instead choose to verbally confront and threaten board members and administrators outside the meeting room and given that public schools receive and are dependent upon federal dollars it's definitely a federal matter.

So tell me have you ever addressed a school board regarding a proposed matter or other relevant issue? I have.
 

yadig

Well-Known Member
If you're a person who wants to speak at a school board meeting you simply call and place your name on the evening agenda so that your comments can be placed on the record. A number of people refuse to comply with that requirement and instead choose to verbally confront and threaten board members and administrators outside the meeting room and given that public schools receive and are dependent upon federal dollars it's definitely a federal matter.

So tell me have you ever addressed a school board regarding a proposed matter or other relevant issue? I have.
U like certain rules don’t ya? Not when it comes too voting though! Quit being played
 

yadig

Well-Known Member
Certainly. Jesus was not highly regarded by the movers and shakers of the time. If the “Sermon on the Mount” exemplifies anything, this is it. Such preaching taken in by the populace could only mean one thing:

Quit twisting a couple bible verses, it’s showing you’re intelligence. How bout “a lazy man shouldn’t eat”.
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
U like certain rules don’t ya? Not when it comes too voting though! Quit being played
The are in fact rules of civil behavior when it comes to public forums and backed by rule of law. Some people think that the law doesn't apply to them as in the 1-6 riot. Last count I saw 700 to this point have been charged. In addition a number of them are all too anxious to rat out the others in order to cop a plea. It's amazing how that radical right ideology suddenly disappears when faced with having a serious record of criminal offenses complete with jail time. BTW be sure to tell us about your experiences during your time running for public office.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
If you're a person who wants to speak at a school board meeting you simply call and place your name on the evening agenda so that your comments can be placed on the record. A number of people refuse to comply with that requirement and instead choose to verbally confront and threaten board members and administrators outside the meeting room and given that public schools receive and are dependent upon federal dollars it's definitely a federal matter.

So tell me have you ever addressed a school board regarding a proposed matter or other relevant issue? I have.
Local school districts are funded by county taxes. Any assistance that the Federal government gives does not give it the right to threat people speaking at a school board meeting. One man in particular who was tackled by deputies was held up as the face of these angry parents against CRT. What was the real story? His daughter was sexually assaulted by a guy in a skirt who was allowed to to use girls restrooms and lockers because he identified as a girl and the school board wanted to push that agenda. The father was told to keep his cool, not raise a stink by the local DA and let the authorities handle it and he'd get justice for his daughter. This was last May at the end of the school year. He found out that the school board moved that kid to another school where he recently assaulted another girl in a restroom. This is your liberal school boards at work. Sacrificing someone's child to push their agenda. Where's the Federal government investigating their duplicity or does the Federal government only support the school boards, not the parents?
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
Quit twisting a couple bible verses, it’s showing you’re intelligence. How bout “a lazy man shouldn’t eat”.
Which bible are you talking about? All religions have hundreds if not thousands of different versions of their bible. All of which has and will continue to be used to support whatever point of view the individual wants it to support.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Which bible are you talking about? All religions have hundreds if not thousands of different versions of their bible. All of which has and will continue to be used to support whatever point of view the individual wants it to support.
Hundreds if not thousands? Exaggerate much? You might have hundreds of different denominations interpreting SOME passages differently.
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
Local school districts are funded by county taxes. Any assistance that the Federal government gives does not give it the right to threat people speaking at a school board meeting. One man in particular who was tackled by deputies was held up as the face of these angry parents against CRT. What was the real story? His daughter was sexually assaulted by a guy in a skirt who was allowed to to use girls restrooms and lockers because he identified as a girl and the school board wanted to push that agenda. The father was told to keep his cool, not raise a stink by the local DA and let the authorities handle it and he'd get justice for his daughter. This was last May at the end of the school year. He found out that the school board moved that kid to another school where he recently assaulted another girl in a restroom. This is your liberal school boards at work. Sacrificing someone's child to push their agenda. Where's the Federal government investigating their duplicity or does the Federal government only support the school boards, not the parents?
If the offense rises to a level of a federal crime it becomes a federal matter. While speaking to a school board you do not threaten or attempt to intimidate or coerce the board members or administrators and get away with it. Why? Because what you say there is for the record and in many cases video taped. Therefore you will be be held accountable for EVERYTHING YOU DO OR SAY. And BTW in many states a sizeable amount of local school funding comes from state governments. And given your nomadic tendencies in addition to paying zero federal income taxes for many years you've haven't paid any school real estate taxes either
 

dmac1

Well-Known Member
The Attorney General of the United States just made an overt threat to treat parents protesting at school board meetings as domestic terrorists who will be looked at by the FBI. If you think that an authoritarian regime can't take over the country you are naive.
If they are threatening board members, they are terrorists- attempting to use fear to coerce a political action they want.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
If the offense rises to a level of a federal crime it becomes a federal matter. While speaking to a school board you do not threaten or attempt to intimidate or coerce the board members or administrators and get away with it. Why? Because what you say there is for the record and in many cases video taped. Therefore you will be be held accountable for EVERYTHING YOU DO OR SAY. And BTW in many states a sizeable amount of local school funding comes from state governments. And given your nomadic tendencies in addition to paying zero federal income taxes for many years you've haven't paid any school real estate taxes either
Federal crime would be kidnapping across state lines. What else? You're nothing but an authoritarian communist.
 

yadig

Well-Known Member
The are in fact rules of civil behavior when it comes to public forums and backed by rule of law. Some people think that the law doesn't apply to them as in the 1-6 riot. Last count I saw 700 to this point have been charged. In addition a number of them are all too anxious to rat out the others in order to cop a plea. It's amazing how that radical right ideology suddenly disappears when faced with having a serious record of criminal offenses complete with jail time. BTW be sure to tell us about your experiences during your time running for public office.
The so called “armed insurrection”, Lmaof! What about the police precincts, police cars, government buildings being torched, was that breaking the law?
 
Top