Why would you not believe that? If the history of Great Britain in the late 1700’s sawI googled "what the 1619 project gets wrong" and at the top is an article on Politico written by a history professor at Northwestern. He fact checked the 1619 project and just a quick glance at what he wrote points outs firstly that the 1619 project states that the colonists went to war in the Revolution to protect slavery. He has other prominent historians agreeing with him. Don't get lost in the weeds, that was just the first of historic inaccuracies he points out. The thing is the the authors of the 1619 Project want to paint a narrative that indoctrinates kids and get them to believe we must totally remake society. And I imagine in the current climate guys like this professor who point out inaccuracies will be slammed, if not already, as racist.
Did you Google the other side? Find out why historians would say that the Revolutionary war was in part to protect slavery? That abolitionist forces in Great Britain were threatening the continued practice of slavery in the colonies?I googled "what the 1619 project gets wrong" and at the top is an article on Politico written by a history professor at Northwestern. He fact checked the 1619 project and just a quick glance at what he wrote points outs firstly that the 1619 project states that the colonists went to war in the Revolution to protect slavery. He has other prominent historians agreeing with him. Don't get lost in the weeds, that was just the first of historic inaccuracies he points out. The thing is the the authors of the 1619 Project want to paint a narrative that indoctrinates kids and get them to believe we must totally remake society. And I imagine in the current climate guys like this professor who point out inaccuracies will be slammed, if not already, as racist.