Old Man Jingles
Rat out of a cage
Does that mean that "Paid" is not paid?
President Trump
- Thread starter wkmac
- Start date
She does have a methodology, however, and her conclusions do have some common sense logic to them.
Labels are meaningless and for those too lazy to think.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
Yes, her rationalizations for her opinions make sense.
My point remains.
It is just some random lady's opinion.
Old Man Jingles
Rat out of a cage
The Mediabiaschart she developed has been recognized by many political pundits as a good reliable tool.
In fact, the developer of this chart Vanessa Otero, has received a grant for $32,000 to refine her chart.
Even if you disagree with the exact placement of a news source on the chart, it still gives one a reasonable place to understand where a news source is coming from and any slant they add to a news story.
BTW, Vanessa states she is a liberal, so you should be OK with it.
Old Man Jingles
Rat out of a cage
Labels are meaningless for those too lazy to think.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
Oh well gee, if the talking heads that sheep like you watch approve of it.......
Then that's all the more reason to not take it seriously.
The creator of the chart is a liberal so I guess that explains why you like it.
Carry on Cuxster.
Benben
Working on a new degree, Masters in BS Detecting!
Pretty much how I saw it. I think the Benghazi crap and Comey's stunt just turned voters away. The voter turn out was at a 20 year low. Voter turnout at 20-year low in 2016 - CNNPolitics.
I also saw a study that had over 2 million voters leaving the presidential pick blank. Those voters were less turned off by the down ballet races.
Clinton received 3 million more votes than did Trump but Trump won some very close and ultimately game changing markets!
Media and polls predicting Trump didn’t stand a chance of winning probably didn’t help Democratic voter turnout either.
LarryBird
Well-Known Member
Not interested in going back to review your novellas.
LarryBird
Well-Known Member
It's 2 sentences and directly above.
And now it's directly below these words...
LarryBird said: ↑
There's not much chance that Trump wins in 2020 imo. The democrats will not be so apathetic about voting this time around, regardless of if they're in love with the candidate or not. A perfect storm of lackluster candidate, polling that said it dems had it in the bag, russian propaganda, and Comey's news drop preceding the election formed to push Trump over the top.
Zzzzzzzzzzz
LarryBird
Well-Known Member
Yes, you were clearly asleep.
That's why you're making posts that were already covered on this page.
Try to keep up with the thread if you're going to post in it.
News for ya: Everything you’ve been saying since you landed here recently has been covered earlier in this thread and on this forum. You’re not breaking new ground either.
LarryBird
Well-Known Member
I'm sure a lot of it has. It's nearly 1200
pages long.I don't think anyone here has encyclopedic knowledge of this thread dating back years, and nobody's expecting them to. But to have read the current page of the thread you're gonna post in, is pretty much the least you could do. It's basically a requirement in my opinion.
Yours might differ, and that's ok too. We're arguing like 2 people who don't agree with each other on a whole slew of things, which I've noticed, we in fact, do.
Old Man Jingles
Rat out of a cage
One big difference between Box Ox and you, is that Box Ox is not an ignorant jerk.I'm sure a lot of it has. It's nearly 1200
I don't think anyone here has encyclopedic knowledge of this thread dating back years, and nobody's expecting them to. But to have read the current page of the thread you're gonna post in, is pretty much the least you could do. It's basically a requirement in my opinion.
Yours might differ, and that's ok too. We're arguing like 2 people who don't agree with each other on a whole slew of things, which I've noticed, we in fact, do.
