LarryBird
Well-Known Member
I'm making a special exception in this particular case.I thought you didn't degrade people?
I'm making a special exception in this particular case.I thought you didn't degrade people?
And as Church Lady says...."aren't YOU special!"I'm making a special exception in this particular case.
Who's talking about child sex trafficking? Sheesh. I'm talking girls in their late teens on into their 20's marrying older men.It's not "perfectly normal". Child sex trafficking is actually against the law in the Philippines, your attempts to rationalize it notwithstanding:
Section 4. Acts of Trafficking in Persons.— It shall be unlawful for any person, natural or juridical, to commit any of the following acts:
(a) To recruit, transport, transfer; harbor, provide, or receive a person by any means, including those done under the pretext of domestic or overseas employment or training or apprenticeship, for the purpose of prostitution, pornography, sexual exploitation, forced labor, slavery, involuntary servitude or debt bondage;
(b) To introduce or match for money, profit, or material, economic or other consideration, any person or, as provided for under Republic Act No. 6955, any Filipino woman to a foreign national, for marriage for the purpose of acquiring, buying, offering, selling or trading him/her to engage in prostitution, pornography, sexual exploitation, forced labor, slavery, involuntary servitude or debt bondage;
(c) To offer or contract marriage, real or simulated, for the purpose of acquiring, buying, offering, selling, or trading them to engage in prostitution, pornography, sexual exploitation, forced labor or slavery, involuntary servitude or debt bondage;
R.A. No. 9208: Anti-Trafficking in Persons Act of 2003
Calling him a rapist isn't a fact.Absolutely not. Just stating fact.
But that's what he's been told by CNN so it must be true!Calling him a rapist isn't a fact.
It's not just children, sex trafficking is illegal period:Who's talking about child sex trafficking? Sheesh. I'm talking girls in their late teens on into their 20's marrying older men.
Calling him a rapist isn't a fact.
It's not just children, sex trafficking is illegal period:
To introduce or match for money, profit, or material, economic or other consideration, any person or, as provided for under Republic Act No. 6955, any Filipino woman to a foreign national, for marriage for the purpose of acquiring, buying, offering, selling or trading him/her to engage in prostitution, pornography, sexual exploitation, forced labor, slavery, involuntary servitude or debt bondage;
I don't know where you ever got the idea that it was legal for a rich American to the fly to the Philippines and basically buy himself a living sex doll, but that's just not the case.
How uninformed are you? Thousands of American men live in the Philippines with younger wives. Nothing illegal about it. Plenty more have brought young wives from the Philippines to the States. Nothing illegal about it. As a matter of fact because of all the American retirees and their wives and children the largest Social Security office in the world outside of the U.S. is attached to our embassy in Manila. Certainly if the sole purpose of the marriage was to enslave the girl and force her into a life of sex bondage that of course is illegal and reprehensible. But you're assuming that's what it's all about and couldn't be further from the truth.It's not just children, sex trafficking is illegal period:
To introduce or match for money, profit, or material, economic or other consideration, any person or, as provided for under Republic Act No. 6955, any Filipino woman to a foreign national, for marriage for the purpose of acquiring, buying, offering, selling or trading him/her to engage in prostitution, pornography, sexual exploitation, forced labor, slavery, involuntary servitude or debt bondage;
I don't know where you ever got the idea that it was legal for a rich American to the fly to the Philippines and basically buy himself a living sex doll, but that's just not the case.
The question is how uninformed are you?How uninformed are you? Thousands of American men live in the Philippines with younger wives. Nothing illegal about it. Plenty more have brought young wives from the Philippines to the States. Nothing illegal about it. As a matter of fact because of all the American retirees and their wives and children the largest Social Security office in the world outside of the U.S. is attached to our embassy in Manila. Certainly if the sole purpose of the marriage was to enslave the girl and force her into a life of sex bondage that of course is illegal and reprehensible. But you're assuming that's what it's all about and couldn't be further from the truth.
So you don't think all of those marriages are legit? I've delivered to maybe a dozen Fil/Am couples over the years. There are huge groups on Yahoo and Facebook about living in the Philippines and marrying young ADULT Filipinas is a major topic. I was planning to go over after retiring at FedEx and finding a wife there but a woman I dated in college contacted me and we're now married.The question is how uninformed are you?
I linked to the law and quoted the relevant sections, you're just waving your hands around and and making things up.
I'm not talking about what other people may or may not have done, I'm talking about what you planned on doing. It's illegal:So you don't think all of those marriages are legit? I've delivered to maybe a dozen Fil/Am couples over the years. There are huge groups on Yahoo and Facebook about living in the Philippines and marrying young ADULT Filipinas is a major topic. I was planning to go over after retiring at FedEx and finding a wife there but a woman I dated in college contacted me and we're now married.
I like how a serial woman abuser reality tv star from New York has done a better job of governing than the last 4 presidents combined.
It drives the dems nuts even with every hit piece the drive by media manufacture about him and every investigation democrats can launch he is still in office. I’m looking forward to a victory in 2020, the 2016 videos are getting old.
That's your opinion. What I have been trying to convey is that if you think he's a POS it doesn't make him a POS. And back to your own deflection, the alternative solution would've been worse. That's my opinion.I said Trump bragged about forcing himself on women without consent.
You deflected to Clinton.
I pointed out your deflection.
You continue to deflect.
I'm not sure why you can't admit trump is a POS. It's not that complicated.
The constant barrage of ludicrous accusations has desensitized anyone who is okay with the status quo. Reference the Boy Who Cried Wolf, you might learn something.I'm not sure why you can't admit trump is a POS. It's not that complicated.
There are no perfect people walking around so let's dig into every presidential candidate's past with a microscope before they get elected and weed out the sinful ones? There won't be anyone left.
.
So you think every republican during Obama's 8 years was a POS.... okay then.A POS is one who does nothing and blocks anyone's efforts to solve problems......