Sportello
Well-Known Member
Works both ways.Too young for my daughter.
She is 44
Works both ways.Too young for my daughter.
She is 44
its funny you guys still chasing trump comments when there are so many liberals that actually put into application what Trump only talked about doing.
the exact verbiage which does not fit the liberal narrative was trump bragging that women would let him do anything he wants. Spacey and Moore aside with their underage rompings many of these cases going back to Cosby and more show that many of these women were willing to prostitute their selves to gain a possible career or financial advantage.
This witch hunt into harassment is a good thing that will hopefully result in women no longer being put in these uncomfortable situations or at least a reduction. At some point though there will be so many of these with more to come that may have to be sorted out into various classifications of what is mildly wrong and what is unforgivable.
Why do you think there is an onslaught of accusations lately?It would really help their cause if they didn't wait 20-30 years to tell the world about it.
It would really help their cause if they didn't wait 20-30 years to tell the world about it.
That would make you.....(doing math in my head).....really old.
Mine turns 33 next month.
You think the wapo was doing research on a former disgraced Alabama Supreme Court judge 2 years ago? Maybe they started looking into him after he won the primary and it took a month to gather all the corroborating evidence. That makes more sense to me than a massive years long conspiracy.yep. you wait 40 years to say something and then say something a month before an election.
part of the discussion then becomes how Wapo suddenly discovered this issue a month before. the former 14 year old claims she would not let them run the story unless they found other victims. clearly the Wapo does not have to abide by any such agreement. who tipped them off to come find her or did they go on a witch hunt for any dirt they could find on this pivotal seat. any democrat who has been chasing the Russian collusion fantasy should be able to recognize that something stinks in how this suddenly came out.
and again for the liberal crazies here if Moore is guilty then Moore should be punished.
but to summarize when the timing is this suspect I have to wonder how long wapo knew they had something ? Did they know this story was out there one or two years ago and wait until a month before to release it?
Instead of looking for the answers to those questions you call it fake news like a true trumpflake. Willful ignorance.but to summarize when the timing is this suspect I have to wonder how long wapo knew they had something ? Did they know this story was out there one or two years ago and wait until a month before to release it?
You think the wapo was doing research on a former disgraced Alabama Supreme Court judge 2 years ago?.
That conclusion is pure insanity. It's obvious once Moore won the primary and was on the national stage he received more scrutiny that turned up this misconduct.I think you just made my argument for me. a disgraced judge who has no relevance is not news worthy. One who wins the primary and leads and has the possible swing vote in congress Is very relevant. I think Wapo had this story and sat on it when he had no relevance. Which would make them an enabler.
That conclusion is pure insanity. It's obvious once Moore won the primary and was on the national stage he received more scrutiny that turned up this misconduct.
insanity versus Naivety the ultimate battle.
Decent reporting for NY Times.Happy Thanksgiving to all the Drumpf supporters.
A Split From Trump Indicates That Flynn Is Moving to Cooperate With Mueller
Why would you expect any less?Decent reporting for NY Times.
Have to disagree with your analysis. Only 1 new statement was made, the rest of the piece was conjecture and personal opinion.Decent reporting for NY Times.
What was new aside from mentioning an end to contact between legal teams?Why would you expect any less?
Have to disagree with your analysis. Only 1 new statement was made, the rest of the piece was conjecture and personal opinion.
Everyone is allowed to make their own determination, mine is they had to fill space on a page, and a three line statement wasn't enough, hence the filler.
Whatever, what is new? I await an answer.Lulz.