Todays history books have been so watered down to make everything so politically correct it stinks.
Your post begs a question. One we should all ask ourselves. Why do we believe something that we haven't bothered to research?
I mean have you really read enough history books to make some kind of quality or accuracy comparison of those books, have you read studies that try to measure the historical accuracy of history books?
And if you haven't done those things, you should ask yourself why do you believe what you believe about history books.
So my point still stands. There are history books that exist. So pretending that taking down statues erases history is 100% phony.