For me, like most democrats, I was dissapointed with the presidents performance. Not because he was weak on substance, but weak in presentation.
One of the things that I dont like about President Obama is his insistence on being a nice guy. He wants to be everyones friend AND HE JUST CANT.
He needed to come out with some fire in his voice and he fell flat. While he was great with this facts, he was weak in responding.
My real problem was with Jim Lehrers performance, he might as well have not have been there. He lost control of the debate right from the start.
Despite clear rules on speaking, he couldnt control either man and each ran over the time limits.
As for Romney, in the short run, he clearly wins the short run after the debate, but in the long run, what he said will cost him. His positions on taxes was completely false, and his explanation was nothing more than a play on words.
The president was absolutely correct in saying that a 20% cut in rate for the top 1% would punch a 5 trillon dollar hole in the revenue stream and IF NOT made up elsewhere, would add to the deficit. Romney wanted to talk about a hypothetical explanation that he would not add to the deficit, but what he WOULD NOT ADMIT was the actual breakdown of his tax plan that would end up hurting middle class americans.
He WILL NOT admit the deductions he will eliminate that will ultimately hurt middle class americans like the mortgage deduction, child tax credits, daycare deductions, uncovered health care costs, state sales taxes, rental property deductions, college tuition credits and workplace deductions like shoes, clothing, union dues, telephone, miles and such.
Instead, he just says he wont add to the deficit. Why wont he just admit these deductions will be eliminated?
And, if he did, would you still vote for him? Seriously? If you knew that all of these deductions will be eliminated, and it hurt you financially, would you still vote for ROMNEY?
Id love to know.
peace
TOS